I’m not normally 
                    a fan of ‘crossover’ music – though 
                    many of the medieval and renaissance 
                    works that I review are the crossover 
                    music of their day, with secular 
                    chansons re-worked as settings 
                    of the mass – so I was rather sniffy 
                    when I saw this recording advertised, 
                    even when it received general acclaim, 
                    not least from Rob Barnett here 
                    on Musicweb – see review. 
                    There are some reviewers who always 
                    seem to be spot-on: over the years 
                    I found that Edward Greenfield’s 
                    reviews in Gramophone and 
                    The Guardian nearly always 
                    led me in the right direction, apart 
                    from the Naxos Shostakovich Leningrad 
                    and Eighth Symphonies where his 
                    recommendation led me to purchase 
                    Slovak’s seriously under-powered 
                    performances, long since replaced 
                    in my collection. 
                  
 
                  
I’m coming to realise 
                    that Rob Barnett’s reviews are equally 
                    likely to lead in the right direction. 
                    He may be less happy with Andrew 
                    Davis’s first version of Elgar’s 
                    Enigma Variations, recently 
                    reissued on Lyrita, than I was 
                    (SRCD.301 – compare his review 
                    with mine: 
                    at least we both very much liked 
                    the Falstaff) but his advice 
                    led me to what I now consider my 
                    ideal versions of Bax’s first two 
                    symphonies (SRCD.232 and 233 – see 
                    review) 
                    and his review of Josef Holbrooke’s 
                    The Birds of Rhiannon persuaded 
                    me to give a second chance to a 
                    work and recording that I had written 
                    off thirty years ago (SRCD.269 – 
                    see my recent recantation). 
                    Thus it was that I came to Jon Lord’s 
                    Durham Concerto, a work which 
                    I am sure I shall return to frequently. 
                    It took me thirty years to put the 
                    Holbrooke work in its proper place, 
                    so a six month delay for Jon Lord 
                    is comparatively short. 
                  
 
                  
Like the music 
                    of Respighi, the Durham Concerto 
                    is reminiscent of the best film 
                    music, though without the rather 
                    brash edge of Feste Romane. 
                    I don’t mean the comparison in any 
                    derogatory sense: I mean film music 
                    of the quality of John Williams, 
                    Erich Korngold and Franz Waxman. 
                    If I were a film director, I’d feel 
                    seriously challenged to produce 
                    the visual equivalent of this music; 
                    it would need to be several cuts 
                    above the usual run of travelogue 
                    to be a worthy companion to the 
                    music. 
                  
 
                  
Admittedly, aspects 
                    of the Durham Concerto are 
                    derivative – Debussy’s La Mer, 
                    Vaughan Williams’s London Symphony, 
                    Holst’s Hammersmith, Coates’s 
                    Piccadilly – but the influences 
                    are absorbed, as Fauré’s 
                    influence is absorbed by Duruflé. 
                    I didn’t find myself checking them 
                    off, as I do whenever I hear the 
                    Lloyd-Webber Requiem. Nor 
                    did I find the use of the Hammond 
                    organ or the local colour provided 
                    by the Northumberland pipes at all 
                    corny, especially when the pipes 
                    are played by their greatest exponent, 
                    Kathryn Tickell. 
                  
 
                  
The one thing which 
                    I thought was something of a mistake 
                    was the interpolation of the Gaudeamus 
                    igitur theme to represent Durham 
                    University – more of a glance in 
                    the direction of the Brahms Academic 
                    Festival Overture than part 
                    of the British academic tradition. 
                    I’m sure that my contemporaries 
                    at Durham would no more associate 
                    Gaudeamus igitur with that 
                    university than I would with Oxford. 
                  
 
                  
Some of Avie’s 
                    publicity material is on the pretentious 
                    side and not strictly accurate – 
                    the ‘Venerable’ Bede was canonised 
                    long ago and should be accorded 
                    his proper title, as St Cuthbert 
                    is. 
                  
 
                  
The Liverpool Phil 
                    and Mischa Damev clearly take the 
                    music seriously; the performance 
                    is all that could be desired and 
                    the recording engineers have also 
                    done well by the music. If you want 
                    to sample before deciding, RB’s 
                    review and the Avie website offer 
                    several soundclips. 
                  
 
                  
This is one of 
                    many Avie recordings which are also 
                    available from eMusic (emusic.com) 
                    as good quality downloads. The bit 
                    rate never falls below the magic 
                    192kbps and two tracks weigh in 
                    at 224kbps – why the variation, 
                    I wonder, which I have noted on 
                    other eMusic downloads? I certainly 
                    found nothing to complain of in 
                    terms of sound quality. It’s also 
                    available at 320kbps from Chandos’s 
                    theclassicalshop.net. 
                  
 
                  
You do miss the 
                    notes, of course, but RB’s detailed 
                    Musicweb review to which I have 
                    referred above will repair much 
                    of that loss; it also includes as 
                    an appendix a considerable amount 
                    of the Avie publicity material which 
                    accompanied the recording. Whichever 
                    form you go for, you really should 
                    give this work a try. 
                  
Brian Wilson