This coupling is certainly not unique. Rachel Barton conjoined 
                them in her Cedille disc (CDR90000068). Of other performances 
                we can – regrettably – overlook the Vox recording made by Aaron 
                Rosand, fine though it is on its own terms, because some snipping 
                has been done, as was sometimes the case with Rosand’s ventures 
                into then unchartered concerto waters.
                  
Christian Tetzlaff’s 
                    performances are very different from Pine’s though he shares 
                    something of her aversion to grandiloquence in the Brahms. 
                    Rather like the recent Capuçon brothers recording of the Double 
                    Concerto Tetzlaff’s Brahms is mellifluous, warmly moulded 
                    and essentially conciliatory in tone. Solo and orchestral 
                    passages taper rather than seek aggressive space. This is, 
                    then, a broadly integrationist approach, essentially lyric. 
                    It values fining down of tone, meticulous weighting of the 
                    solo line with the orchestral fabric (some outstanding work 
                    on that score) and a rather chamber sized sense of projection. 
                    Tetzlaff certainly rouses himself in his approach to the first 
                    movement cadenza, dispatched finely. The central movement 
                    is similarly selfless and promotes articulate wind lines that 
                    curl and coil with great finesse. The giocoso is stressed 
                    in the finale, which goes pretty well, the aural balances 
                    once more strongly attended to and the Hungarian melos suitably 
                    brought to the fore.
                  
I much prefer 
                    the tempo decisions Tetzlaff and Dausgaard make to those of 
                    Pine and Kalmar on Cedille – the latter very slow – but I 
                    still feel that, as with the Capuçon brothers and the Double, 
                    this Tetzlaff is too partial a view of the work, a little 
                    too reined in.
                  
Tetzlaff is considerably 
                    faster than Pine in the Joachim Concerto as well, to its advantage 
                    I think. This is a work that long fell into oblivion after 
                    initial promise. Composed between 1857 and 1860 it reflects 
                    to some extent the influence of Mendelssohn though its strongly 
                    rhapsodic profile is intriguing and successful. The extensive 
                    orchestral introduction has rather a formidable cut to it, 
                    though Joachim spices his score with vigorous hunting horn 
                    motifs and a fair amount of paprika – all very well integrated 
                    into the writing without become a fetish in themselves.  Joachim’s 
                    view of the gypsy lassu is perhaps a little cosmopolitan 
                    here but the slow movement has a reflective intimacy that 
                    is genuinely attractive. The finale is exciting, based on 
                    the Verbunkos dance and played with considerable dash 
                    by Tetzlaff and the Danish forces.
                  
It’s something 
                    of a luxury to have this programme available in two such different 
                    a set of performances. My choice goes to Tetzlaff despite 
                    some reservations concerning the tenor of his Brahms.
                  
Jonathan 
                    Woolf