Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Anyone who doubts the prowess of the Belcea Quartet will
surely have their view altered by these impressive performances.
Having
attended several of their recitals and owning their recordings
I am confident that the Belcea can rightly take its place
amongst the very finest ensembles on the world stage. I
remain enthusiastic over the Belcea’s 2006 release of the
Mozart String Quartets: K.465 Dissonance and K.499 Hoffmeister on EMI
Classics (3444552 - see review). I have
also reviewed the superb Belcea set of the Britten String
Quartets also on EMI (5579682 - see review); one
of my ‘2005 Records of the
Year’.
I believe that these six quartets, written between 1908-39, are the
most important of the twentieth century and amongst the most
significant in the repertoire. They could be said to illustrate
the development of Bartók’s musical career. During the 1950s
and 1960s they were regarded as amongst the most austere
and challenging imaginable; frequently incomprehensible to
the mainstream listener. Now a sea-change in attitude means
that they are generally seen as more approachable, essential
listening and more often programmed in recital.
The String Quartet No.1 completed in 1909 is the most romantic
of the series. Bartók composed the score it seems in the
wake of his infatuation with a student whilst a piano teacher
at the Budapest Academy of Music. Cast in three movements
it shows the remaining influence of Mahler and Strauss and
bears the melodies of the folk music he was collecting. In
the Lento the playing of the Belceas evoked
for me a landscape of cold, bleak Arctic tundra. Notable
in the central movement is the appearance of the ‘thunder-clap’ cello pizzicato at
7:38 and 7:59. The strings saw and gnaw away in the rhythmic
opening section of the final movement, giving way to a calmer
state that soon develops a significant agitation. Throughout
I was struck by how much quieter the Belceas are with slower tempi compared
to say the Takács on Decca.
The three movement String Quartet No.2 was composed between
1915 and 1917 in Rákoskeresztúr, Budapest during the unfolding
horrors of the Great War. At this time Bartók was working
on his ballet The Wooden Prince. Musicologist David
Ewen writes that the String Quartet No.2, “sheds
derivative influences in favor of strength, brusqueness,
primitivism …” In the Moderato the Belceas are
robust, communicating an eerie sense of the primeval. The
driving, spiky rhythms of the central movement are notable
and the Lento has a shadowy character redolent of
a desolate wilderness.
From Budapest in 1927 the acerbic String Quartet No.3 is atonal
and shows Bartók toying with the serial techniques. It is
sometimes thought that he was inspired to compose the score
by Alban Berg’s Lyric Suite from 1926. The densely
packed score is in two parts. The Belceas are convincingly
characterful and not overly threatening in the Prima parte: Moderato.
Their performance in the Seconda parte: Allegro is
clean and precise, attacking with genuine spirit. In the
closing movement, elaborately marked Recapitulazione della
prima parte: Moderato - Coda: Allegro
molto,the players communicate strongly, contrasting
an amorous yearning with a degree of brusqueness.
Bartók composed his String Quartet No.4 in Budapest at the
time of writing his two Rhapsodies in their original
versions for violin and piano. The five movement score contains
progressive and abstract music. Cast in an ‘arch structure’ the
opening movement is related thematically to the final movement
and the second movement to the fourth, with the third movement Non
troppo lento providing the central core. The Allegro abounds
in perplexing and frenzied activity and in the Prestissimo, con
sordino I could visualise insects scurrying around in
the sweltering humidity of the tropical rainforest. At the
heart of the quartet, the Non troppo lento movement,
the Belceas convey a sense of slow motion and the Allegretto
pizzicato is razor sharp and highly rhythmic. The players
communicate a mechanical quality to the Finale, Allegro
molto with the slow central section providing only a
short respite.
The String Quartet No.5 from 1934 preceded the famous Music
for Strings, Percussion and Celesta of 1936. Following
a similar design to the preceding quartet the score utilises
the ‘arch structure’ around a central Scherzo: alla
bulgarese. Here Bartók has settled on a generally unifying
tonality. In the opening movement Allegro the Belceas
offer shattering, at times, grotesque syncopations. With
expanses of considerable breadth in the Adagio molto the
playing has an apt sense of nocturnal mystery. Bright and
sharp-edged Bulgarian rhythms strongly feature in the Scherzo marked alla
bulgarese and the Andante has a wealth of expressive
intensity. I enjoyed the dance-influenced Finale: Allegro
vivace with its urgent and wild disposition.
Cast in four movements the String Quartet No.6 was composed
in Budapest in 1939 just after the outbreak of the Second
World War. It was written around the time of the Divertimento
for String Orchestra which was the last score that Bartók
composed prior to his flight to America to escape the war
in Europe. Once again, as with the preceding quartet, Bartók
decided to employ a constant tonality. The opening movement Mesto: Vivace is
given a confident performance here with concentrated and
restless power. A sense of dark menace prevails in the Mesto: Marcia,although
melody strives to rise to the surface in this emotional roller-coaster.
An atmosphere of dark menace is maintained in the Mesto: Burletta with
a thorny burst of aggression and contrasting suggestions
of happier times. In the final movement Mesto the
Belceas sustain a heart-wrenching sadness in music that sinks
into a pit of bitter depression.
Recordings of the Bartók String Quartets are well served in the catalogues
and there are several sets that I am pleased to have in my
collection. These accounts from the Belceas are splendidly
performed but when compared to the versions from the outstanding
Takács Quartet a wide gulf is starkly noticeable. The Takács,
my first choice performers in these quartets,
provide thrilling and raw-edged performances of great intensity
and power. Recorded in 1996 in Germany the Takács are recorded
to demonstration standard and their double set is available
on Decca 445 297-2.
Other splendid versions include the Alban Berg Quartet on EMI who
play with energy, fire and significant skill. That set was
recorded in 1987 on EMI Double Forte 7 47720-8 and re-issued
on EMI Gemini 3609472. The Emerson perform with passion and
excitement, displaying great virtuosity. Recorded in 1988
this set won a Grammy and a Gramophone Record of the Year
award. It was on Deutsche Grammophon 423 657-2 and was reissued
in 2007 on 477 6322. For Naxos the Vermeer Quartet play with
skill and vigour, although taking a less raw-edged approach
than many rivals. The Vermeers were recorded in Ontario,
Canada between 2001 and 2004 on Naxos 8.557543-44. The Zehetmair
on ECM has recorded the Bartók String Quartet No. 5.
This is an insightful version of technical precision and
impressive security of ensemble. Recorded in 2006 at Götzis, Austria, the Zehetmair disc is on ECM
New Series 1874 (c/w Hindemith String Quartet No. 4,
Op.22).
The Bartók String Quartets are decently recorded and splendidly performed
by the Belcea Quartet. However by some distance the set from
the Takács on Decca is the one to have.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.