Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
Bohuslav
MARTINŮ (1890-1959) Complete works for violin and orchestra - Volume 3
Suite concertante (first version) H276 (1939) [24:02]
Suite concertante (second version) H276A (1944) [22:42]
Rhapsody-Concerto H337 (1952) [21:53]
Bohuslav Matoušek (violin)
Czech Philharmonic Orchestra/Christopher Hogwood
rec. Dvořák Hall, Rudolfinum, Prague, May 2001 (H276), April 2004 (H276A),
December 2005 (H337) HYPERION CDA67673 [68:49]
Like
the different versions of Sibelius’s Violin Concerto, there
is no real perversity in presenting the two versions of
Martinů’s Suite concertante on one disc. Commissioned
by the Polish-born, American violinist Samuel Dushkin,
Martinů’s original intentions for the work had been
to write a set of ‘Czech Dances for violin and orchestra’,
but unaccustomed difficulties with the work’s gestation
led the composer to scrap his original sketches and start
anew. Plans for the first performance of the work were
interrupted by impending war, and it was fifty years before
the first version of the work would see the light of day
in May 2000 at the Prague Spring Festival. The excellent
booklet notes for this release describe the air of mystery
surrounding the work’s neglect, the piece having been offered
to Koussevitzky more than once, and eventually first played
in the early 1940s with the orchestral part in piano reduction.
The Suite
concertante has a great deal of violin-virtuoso writing
in the solo part, with some spectacular birdsong-like
stylings in the Intermezzo third movement. The Meditation second
movement forms a central elegy, and owes its character
at least in part to Martinů’s desperate love for
Vítěslava Kaprálová, a woman half the composer’s
age. Martinů’s trademark orchestration with piano,
and his harmonic fingerprints such as the so-called ‘Juliette
chord’ are all richly present, rounded off with a more
than usually rambunctious Allegro vivo finale.
The
second version differs from the first in a number of significant
ways – so much so that there are probably more differences
than similarities. The material of the opening Prelude is
used, but altered considerably, and the second movement,
now an Aria, has even more of that searching harmonic
spice on which the open and free melodic shapes surf in
a kind of slow motion ballet of musical development. Listing
all of the changes and transformations is an interesting
exercise, but also significantly Martinů uses similar
ideas from the final Rondo in his Violin Concerto
No. 1. The coupling of this version of the Suite
concertante with that first violin concerto appeared
with exactly the same forces, right down to the producer
and engineer, and made in the same location as this disc
on a Supraphon release: SU3653-2031. I would expect the
timings to be similar, but the timings for not only the
whole work but that of each movement are identical in both
releases. The Supraphon version was made in May 2001, and
December 2005 is given as the recording date on the Hyperion
disc. The simple effort of putting the two together on
a mixer programme however shows that they are in fact one
and the same recording.
Martinů’s Rhapsody-Concerto for
viola and orchestra has been one of my desert-island works
for a long time now, and, like my much loved reference
recording (Supraphon 110374-2) of Josef Suk with Vaclav
Neumann, shows soloist Bohuslav Matoušek equally at home
with the larger viola in his hands as the violin. Written
in New York in 1952, the work can be seen both as the start
of Martinů’s late neo-Romantic style, and as emotively
expressive of the composer’s nostalgia for the land of
his youth. This is essential Martinů, and equally
essential for any lover of good music in my humble opinion.
I wouldn’t want to be without Suk, but the Matoušek/Hogwood
combination shows an equally warm and affectionate view
of the music. If anything, they are a little more spacious,
an aspect reflected in slightly longer playing times, in
the first of the two movements in particular. The music
refuses to drag however, and Hogwood builds the opening
of the second movement with great power. A little more
urgency in the poco allegro might not have come
amiss, but I am so pre-programmed with Suk that I am reluctant
to make this a point of criticism. This is life-enhancing
stuff which, should you not already know it I can only
urge you to try – it may convert you to Martinů for
life, and I sincerely hope it does. If it doesn’t, at least
you will have one of his most beautiful works, and one
of the best for that neglected solo string instrument,
the viola.
In
conclusion, this continuation of Hyperion’s Complete
Music for Violin and Orchestra (see reviews of Volume
1 and Volume
2) is a masterly, moving and highly enjoyable
disc. If someone can resolve
the Supraphon H276A question
then you can call me Postman Pat, and mark me down as a
very happy man indeed.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.