Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Founding Editor Rob Barnett Editor in Chief
John Quinn Contributing Editor Ralph Moore Webmaster
David Barker Postmaster
Jonathan Woolf MusicWeb Founder Len Mullenger
John Ramsden
WILLIAMSON (b.1929) Music for woodwind CD1
Sonata for flute and piano for Miriam Hughes (2002) [13:33]
Sonata for clarinet and piano (2001) [26:38]
Sonata for bassoon (1993) [20:19] CD2
Sonatina for flute and piano (1986 rev. 2004) [8:16]
Suite for clarinet and piano (1991) [12:05]
Sonatina for bassoon and piano (2005) [11:32]
Miriam Hughes
(flute)
Sarah Ableman (clarinet)
Rosemary Richardson (bassoon)
David Jones (piano)
rec. location and dates not given DUNELM DRD0271 [60:32
+ 31:55]
Dunelm Records now has no fewer than nine CD releases which
include work by the Manchester-born composer John Williamson.
This includes a continuing series of his substantial output
for piano solo. His work for winds and piano is representative
of a style which is solidly in a tonal tradition which respects
the nature of each instrument, balances soloist and accompaniment
in a dialogue of equals, and is potentially enjoyable and rewarding
for performer and listener alike.
Played by its dedicatee, the Sonata for flute and piano makes
for a confident start, with some dramatic gestures and an elegant
turn of phrase. Williamson’s sonatas do not always fall within
the traditional three movement fast-slow-fast pattern, but
this does, with a central Recitative in which the instruments
ask more wistful questions, concluding with a final effervescent fast
movement. The material of each movement is related in tonal
flavour, with added notes providing some acidity to the chords
in the piano.
Williamson’s way of combining his chordal structures with
his melodic motifs continues in the Sonata for clarinet
and piano. This technique does provide considerable unity
between the two instruments, but makes one wonder if we will
ever get a tune made up of anything other than notes from within
the chords used. The first movement is a case in point, in
which the passagework from the clarinet does little more than
comment on the quasi-pentatonic tonalities in the piano. The
four movements of this piece include a set of variations which
I hoped would introduce a wider range of expression, but aside
from a mixture of tempos and differing characters, the various
sections really only offer more of the same.
The first disc of this set concludes with the Sonata for
bassoon and piano, which is a slightly earlier work from
1993. There are few features of the work which distinguish
it from the previous ones. I had some hopes of the second
movement, the Song of Sorrow, but aside from some
doloroso meandering, the melodic shapes have little emotional
impact. There are some intonation issues which don’t help
with the admittedly difficult to combine antique quality
of the bassoon and needle-sharp tones of a modern piano,
but the consistency of Williamson’s unifying techniques were
starting to drive me up the wall by this stage in any case.
I know I will be moaned at for being critical of an elder
statesman of British music, and I am sure that, performed in
isolation in a programme of pieces by other composers these
sonatas would work perfectly well, but having three piled one
on top of each other is a bit much for my digestion. For me
the problem is one of too much unity. The melodic instruments
are never really allowed to break free from the yoke of material
developed in the piano part, so while the piano is rarely heard
in a subservient role, the melodic solo never really ‘flies’.
Similar issues arise with the Sonatinas and Suite on
the second disc, although the brevity of most of the movements
lightens the load somewhat. Take almost any of the recognised
20th century solo + piano sonatas, and listen to
how the big tunes are allowed to grow through the independent
character of the parts. Exceptions to this rule of thumb, such
as the canonic writing in César Franck’s Sonata for violin
and piano, succeed through the strength of their ideas and
some seriously contrasting textures and relationships both
tonally and in terms of density. In the works on these CDs
I found myself yearning for a ‘big tune’ of any kind, despite
the undoubted inventiveness and communicative melodic facility
throughout. When looked at even just a little more closely
than just casual listening, the melodies in these works are
too motivic and fragmentary – their often sequential nature
also giving rise to a certain amount of irritability for this
listener: they have difficulty breathing, their heads always
seeming to bob along just below the surface of the piano’s
waterways in terms of the material they receive.
The performances on these recordings are generally very good,
and David Jones does sterling work as the ever-present pianist.
Rosemary Richardson’s bassoon has a noisy mechanism, but this
is the way of their kind. The recordings are vivid and clear,
though I would have appreciated some wider stereo separation
at times – the clarinet sessions border on enhanced mono over
headphones, and though this is less of a problem through loudspeakers
there’s still precious little difference between left and right.
While it’s probably too late to hope that my comments on
the music come over as too negative, I feel I must add that
I don’t actively dislike this music. What’s to dislike? As
I say at the beginning, these works are well written for their
instruments, are all eminently approachable, and taken in isolation
are worth exploring by players and listeners alike. Picking
the recordings up again after being left to simmer for a few
days, and my frustrations remain however. Maybe I’m just a
curmudgeonly old Scrooge who needs locking away, and maybe
getting another composer to comment on this set of works wasn’t
such a good idea. Whatever the case, the Dunelm Records website
will have sound samples, so you can decide for yourself if
these good natured pieces are up your street.
Reviews
from previous months Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the
discs reviewed. details We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin
Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to
which you refer.