George Rochberg is 
                not a familiar name to many people nevertheless 
                he was a composer of great power and 
                imagination. His works are often large 
                in scale and ambition. He had wonderful 
                control over orchestral colours and 
                textures and always presented a cohesive 
                musical argument. Rochberg was born 
                in Paterson, New Jersey of Jewish Ukrainian 
                parents on 5 July 1918. Like his close 
                contemporary (and fellow impressive 
                symphonist), William Schuman, Rochberg 
                played jazz piano in New York clubs 
                as a student. He studied at the Mannes 
                School of Music where his studies brought 
                him into contact with, among others, 
                George Szell, later studying at the 
                Curtis Institute in Philadelphia. He 
                was seriously wounded at the Battle 
                of the Bulge during the Second World 
                War and he remained with a slight limp 
                for the rest of his life. He was director 
                of publications for Theodore Presser 
                from 1951 and in 1960 became chairman 
                of the music department at the University 
                of Pennsylvania and then Annenberg Professor 
                of Humanities from 1979 until retirement 
                in 1983. 
              
 
              
Rochberg’s musical 
                style falls into three distinct periods. 
                Before his meeting with Luigi Dallapiccola 
                in 1951, Rochberg’s music was chromatic, 
                almost atonal, although still recognisably 
                from tonal roots. Between the early 
                1950s and 1963, he was the darling of 
                the American avant-garde and 
                wrote exclusively serial music, the 
                most important work from this period 
                being the Second Symphony of 1955-56, 
                premiered by Rochberg’s former professor 
                George Szell and the Cleveland Orchestra 
                in 1961. The Naxos American Classics 
                recording of this work has been reviewed 
                several times previously for Musicweb, 
                as has the Fifth Symphony by Neil Horner 
                [review]. 
                Following the death of his son in 1964, 
                Rochberg abandoned the twelve-tone system 
                in search of a music language which 
                would allow him the increased degree 
                of expression he sought. Possibly his 
                most notable work from this third period 
                is the Third String Quartet from 1972, 
                which also bore the Transcendental 
                Variations, an arrangement for string 
                orchestra of the Quartet’s slow movement. 
              
 
              
"This is the craziest 
                music I have ever seen" is reportedly 
                how Rochberg’s teacher Leopold Mannes, 
                reacted to being shown the piano score 
                of the Capriccio of Rochberg’s 
                First Symphony. The Symphony is a monster, 
                it has to be said, being a five-movement 
                work of well over an hour’s duration. 
                At the most superficial level, the First 
                Symphony resembles the model of Mahler’s 
                Seventh Symphony – two substantial symphonic 
                movements at beginning and end, a furious 
                scherzo in the centre and two 
                ‘night music’ pieces as second and fourth 
                movements. This superficial level is 
                where the similarity ends, however. 
                This symphony is a vastly ambitious 
                creation for a young 30-year-old composer 
                to attempt and I was constantly struck 
                by the confidence and assurance shown 
                in the composition of this powerful 
                yet slightly rambling work. Originally 
                written during 1948-49, Rochberg revised 
                the First Symphony in 1977 and then 
                again in 2002-03 in preparation for 
                this recording. 
              
 
              
The first movement 
                (along with a great deal of the rest 
                of the Symphony) shows the strong influence 
                of the music by Stravinsky Rochberg 
                doubtless heard in New York such as 
                the Symphony in C and Symphony in 3 
                Movements, as well as (to my ears) early 
                Schoenberg and hints of Berg, Martinů, 
                Varčse, Copland and early 
                Bernstein – whose own First Symphony 
                had appeared in 1942. The work opens 
                without any preamble whatsoever and 
                brings to mind the aforementioned Stravinsky 
                Symphony in Three Movements. There seems 
                to be almost a straight quote from the 
                Stravinsky work at around 3:03 and again 
                later at 9:04. Rochberg’s confidence 
                in his skills is shown not only in the 
                complex, dissonant, contrapuntal music 
                that pervades much of the movement but 
                also in the bravery of ending the ‘exposition’ 
                section with a blatant, richly scored 
                C major chord. The movement is taughtly 
                argued throughout its eleven minutes 
                and makes an impressive start, living 
                up to the marking Exultant!! 
                in the score. Wherever next? 
              
 
              
What we have in the 
                second movement is a true Night Music. 
                This is not, however, a night music 
                like Mahler or Bartók. This was 
                the first part of the Symphony to be 
                written, standing alone for some months, 
                and is very much Rochberg’s own distinctive 
                sound world. The heart of this movement 
                could quite easily be the slow movement 
                of a cello concerto. This is a lament 
                of extreme tranquility and one feels 
                that Rochberg’s dedication for the Symphony 
                "To my mother, in memoriam" 
                is at its most deeply felt here. This 
                extensive ruminatory music is framed 
                by sections more agitated in nature. 
              
 
              
The Capriccio 
                third movement is a Stravinskian/Varèsian/Coplandesque 
                scherzo of massive proportions. 
                The percussion comes very much into 
                prominence here and the music has a 
                relentless forward drive that leaves 
                the listener breathless after nearly 
                fourteen minutes. The huge Variations 
                fourth movement sounds oddly ‘English’ 
                in many places, Rochberg’s symphonic 
                contrapuntal skills echoing those of 
                Edmund Rubbra. The movement leads straight 
                into the Finale - the First Symphony’s 
                only movement lasting under ten minutes. 
                After a brief slow introduction which 
                continues the hazy music which concluded 
                the Variations, we are thrust 
                into what Rochberg himself described 
                as "peg-leg Pete" music, with 
                its lolloping gait and constant changes 
                of direction. 
              
 
              
The performance of 
                the Saarbrücken Radio Symphony 
                Orchestra is exemplary in every way 
                and Christopher Lyndon-Gee obviously 
                has the full measure of this gargantuan 
                work. His credentials have already been 
                fully shown in the previous Rochberg 
                releases which have won such critical 
                acclaim. The recording is first rate 
                to match, having the perfect combination 
                of warm, natural sound and enough detail 
                in the recording to hear Rochberg’s 
                sometimes complex contrapuntal textures. 
              
 
              
This Symphony has been 
                a major discovery for me and repeated 
                listenings have been intensely rewarding. 
                Rochberg is undoubtedly one of the most 
                important American symphonists. I think 
                only William Schuman could realistically 
                vie with Rochberg for the mantle of 
                ‘the’ most important American symphonist. 
                This giant of a symphony has not had 
                an easy life and I hope Christopher 
                Lyndon-Gee’s world première recording 
                will bring to it the larger audience 
                it so richly deserves. 
              
Derek Warby