This
                        is the second instalment in Enrico Belli’s project to
                        record all four of George Crumb’s 
Makrokosmos – the
                        first of which is reviewed 
here.
                        As with the combination of Debussy with Crumb, the decision
                        has been made to mix the music up rather than keep the
                        two composers’ pieces complete. The programming here
                        is Crumb’s 
Alpha Centauri, Stravinsky’s 
Le
                        Sacre part I, Crumb’s 
Beta Cygni and 
Gamma
                        Draconis, Stravinsky’s 
Le Sacre part II, and
                        Crumb’s 
Delta Orionis to finish. The logic of
                        pairing these works is fair, but the only reason for
                        hustling them up in such a way is given rather lamely
                        on the back cover: “[the] interweaving of works by Igor
                        Stravinsky and George Crumb opens entirely new horizons
                        of perception.” I’m not going to harp on about this for
                        long, but I do wonder for whom these ‘horizons of perception’ will
                        be opened. Newcomers to such works are more likely to
                        be confused, wondering which piece is which. Old aurally
                        wizened lags like your average MusicWeb-International
                        reviewer are more likely to respond irritably, preferring
                        to broaden their own horizons through playing multiple
                        versions of the same piece through wobbly stacks of old
                        CD players or trying to sing along to a karaoke production
                        of ‘Wozzeck’ just for laughs. I will agree, putting different
                        pieces of music against each other can change perceptions,
                        but this rarely has durability in a library collection
                        as its end result. I didn’t feel particularly enriched
                        by having these pieces chopped about in this way, but
                        will gladly give way to the experiences of anyone who ‘sees
                        the light’ as a result.
                    
                     
                    
                    
My
                        reference for comparison with Crumb’s 
Makrokosmos
                        IV is that of Robert Nasveld on the Attacca label,
                        9371 and 9372. My main reason for selecting this version
                        is that it has always come out on top, all other recordings
                        which I have come across long having gone by the wayside.
                        Add to this the association Nasveld has had with Crumb
                        himself, something which gives his recording some status
                        of authority. Unencumbered by Stravinsky, Nasveld, forming
                        a duo with Jacob Bogaard, creates a sense of organic
                        flow between the movements which has its own structure
                        and logic. Their recording penetrates deep within the
                        piano, much as a well amplified performance should in
                        a live concert. This is essential, not for creating DJ
                        loudness, but in revealing the subtleties of the inner
                        workings of string harmonics, plucked strings, percussive
                        effects, preparation of strings and all kinds of neat
                        tricks, all of which were bigger news in 1979 than they
                        are now. 
                     
                    
With
                        all due respect for the Belli duo’s talents, there is
                        no comparison between these recordings. There is a distinct
                        lack of any real impression of the detail of sonic activity
                        within the piano, and any resonance there are come across
                        as a weak echo of the performer’s actions rather than
                        the musical consequence of the composer’s instructions.
                        It’s sometimes as if the amplifier had broken down, but
                        the concert went ahead anyway. There is more substance
                        in the effects in 
Gamma Draconis, but the comparative
                        effect is of the musicians going at the music like a
                        bull in a china shop, and the results are jangly and
                        unattractive. Crumb’s ideas still survive, barely, as
                        fresh and original in this recording, but the music can
                        and should sound so much better.
                     
                    
Le
                          Sacre du printemps on pianos
                          in various forms has been something of a collector’s
                          hobby for me. Stravinsky’s own piano duet version is
                          not the only variant available, but there are several
                          versions of this on disc, with just two being Philip
                          Moore and Simon Crawford-Philips on 
Deux-Elles and
                          on Naxos, with Benjamin Frith and Peter Hill. Observant
                          critics will see that this latter release sports the
                          label ‘Music for two pianos’, but before I get ‘aghast’ e-mails
                          claiming gross incompetence on my part I would just
                          like to point out that the earlier edition says ‘Music
                          for Four Hands’, the ‘Rite’ indeed being the ‘right’ version
                          for piano duet as opposed to piano duo. Out of these
                          I find myself preferring the Naxos recording these
                          days, with its greater sense of atmosphere in the recording.
                          Dag Achatz and Roland Pöntinen’s recording on BIS should
                          also be considered. I was initially happier with Enrico
                          and Olivia Belli in their Stravinsky over their Crumb,
                          but alarm bells rather than ‘Mythical Dances’ soon
                          started ringing. 
                     
                    
I
                        can’t help but think the Belli Duo have come to see this
                        purely as concert repertoire, rather than music for ballet.
                        This is an important aspect of this arrangement and of
                        the music as a whole, but for me the impression should
                        still be left that the music is strongly associated with
                        choreography. I want to sense Stravinsky at the piano,
                        hacking out the score in reduction for the benefit of
                        Diaghilev’s dancers, the smell of sweat and chalk and
                        the instructor’s voice cracking out its demands like
                        the whip of a circus ringmaster. From the beginning,
                        that lonely melody becomes stretched and mauled about,
                        so that the sense of rhythm is not only given added mystic
                        aura, but is lost entirely. The impact of the 
Augures
                        printaniers is better, but to my mind lacks real
                        urgency, and the same goes for the 
Jeu de rapt,
                        where those syncopated rhythms are over-pedalled and
                        lose their feisty hammer-blow strength. I could go on,
                        but you should be getting the idea by now. The music
                        has a feeling of a cooking recipe, fine and expensive
                        ingredients all prepared and almost formed into haute
                        cuisine but brought out of the oven just a few minutes
                        too early. The centre of the cake is just a little too
                        raw, the meat too bloody, the soufflé flat and uninviting
                        rather than quivering with excitement at its peak of
                        perfection. Heavy, mannered chugging in the second section
                        at 1:04 of the 
Mystic Circles of the Young Girls is
                        another instance of what I mean – lighter, more separated
                        figuration is surely required here, and I can’t imagine
                        anyone wanting to dance to what follows. The Belli Duo’s
                        Stravinsky is not 
bad, but we already have better
                        recordings, so I can’t deny my preference for the greater élan
                        of Frith and Hill. Adding faint praise to my colleague’s
                        damning of Vol. I in this unfurling set doesn’t augur
                        too well for Wergo’s project with Enrico Belli. I hope
                        their future horizons open with a little more subtle
                        finesse. 
                     
                    
Dominy Clements