The Lucerne Festival 
                  Orchestra isn't any ordinary orchestra. It's an ensemble made 
                  up of the finest players in Europe, many of them big names on 
                  their own, but this is no rock star type line-up. What makes 
                  an orchestra is the players’ ability to interact in ensemble. 
                  Many of these musicians play together regularly at Lucerne but 
                  not always in the same combination. The mixture seems to ignite 
                  because the atmosphere, at Lucerne, is electric. These are players 
                  who can achieve with chamber-like intimacy, yet understand their 
                  role in the broad sweep of orchestral perspective. In Mahler's 
                  own time, orchestral standards were not as high as they are 
                  now, and the music relatively unfamiliar. Musicianship like 
                  this shows just how visionary Mahler was, for players like these 
                  are so technically assured that they can focus on the spirit 
                  of the music. The more we know Mahler, the more, perhaps, we 
                  can appreciate the intelligence and complexity in his music. 
                
The joy of this 
                  DVD is that we can watch the orchestra interact as they play. 
                  We can see the body language, and the little flashes of unconscious 
                  communication. Indeed, because the camera can close-up on Abbado's 
                  face and hands, we can see more on film than we might in the 
                  amphitheatre: it's more like being among the musicians, seeing 
                  and hearing what they hear while they are in the process of 
                  playing. It really does add to the experience when you can watch 
                  the musicians as they play. You can see the string players’ 
                  individual fingering and understand how it affects the sound 
                  they make. It's fascinating to watch how the wind-players move, 
                  how their muscles and deftness of touch affect what they do. 
                  Most of us get our music via recordings, so it's all too easy 
                  to think of music in terms of technical values. Yet, without 
                  musicians, there'd “be” no music. Music existed long before 
                  recording. Films like this are an important reminder that it 
                  is fundamentally a human and creative process. 
                
The filming here 
                  is musically informed. These cameramen know the music well, 
                  so they know what to pick up on and when. It's almost as if 
                  they are part of the process because they reveal telling details 
                  within the whole. For example, there is a close-up of the triangle 
                  being beaten. It's a humble instrument, easily lost in the mass, 
                  but this film emphasises its significance in creating the “Alpine 
                  motif”, for it extends the sounds of cowbells. It might even 
                  evoke the ticking of a clock, a reasonable image, given the 
                  possible meaning of this symphony. Mahler as orchestral colourist 
                  knew what he was doing, and this film director understood. This 
                  sort of musical sensitivity shows just how far the filming of 
                  music has progressed over the years. This is a valuable recording 
                  because it “is” filmed, and by people who know the music. 
                
Freed of technical 
                  limitations, Abbado can rely on the response of his players, 
                  as artists, to achieve this interpretation. It's certainly different, 
                  for what he emphasises is the lucidity in the score, without 
                  exaggerating the excessive “emotionalism” that some performances 
                  fall back on. This is not to say that Abbado isn't emotional 
                  – far from it – but the quality of emotion is directed towards 
                  a specific purpose. Abbado's Mahler recognises the advances 
                  we've had in understanding Mahler over the last few years and 
                  takes its cue from the score in that light. For Mahler awareness 
                  of death enhanced his love of life. Abbado himself knows only 
                  too well how the hammer-blows of fate can suddenly strike people 
                  down, so, perhaps, like Mahler, the life-enhancing aspects of 
                  the music mean all the more. From time to time, Abbado bursts 
                  into beaming smiles, if only to acknowledge his appreciation 
                  of what his players are doing. But make no mistake, these smiles 
                  have been hard-won. 
                
              
However, as Donald 
                Mitchell, in an essay reprinted in ‘Discovering Mahler’ (Boydell, 
                2007) says, “it is the Sixth alone among all Mahler's symphonies 
                and song-cycles in which death triumphs”. That's why I approached 
                this performance with some trepidation, although I love the transcendence 
                with which Abbado infuses the Second, Third and even the Ninth 
                Symphonies. The relative lack of grim fatalism is compensated 
                by some particularly vivid string playing where the “finger of 
                death” seems almost palpable. Horror doesn't “have” to be heavy-handed. 
                These icy strings are definitely chilling, almost shrill in their 
                intensity. The Lucerne hammer-blows may not knock you out of your 
                seat, but you don't need to be reminded, if you've been listening 
                to how Abbado has built up the tension. And as Mitchell also notes, 
                Mahler is “imagining” death, rather than building a case in its 
                favour, so Abbado's approach isn't out of line. 
              
At the end of the 
                performance, the camera pans again over the audience, lingering 
                for a moment on two musicians who have been closely associated 
                with Abbado for many years, Daniel Harding and Thomas Quasthoff. 
                In the UK, much has been made of Harding's early years with Rattle, 
                but it is in fact Abbado with whom he has had the more important 
                relationship. The various orchestras Abbado has formed are extremely 
                important to him, and to his vision of musicianship. It is extremely 
                significant that since 1998, he's had Harding at the helm of his 
                Mahler Chamber Orchestra, which is intricately related to the 
                Lucerne Festival Orchestra in Abbado's own “system” of connected 
                orchestras. With conductors like Abbado and Boulez, I do believe 
                we are on the verge of a deeper understanding of Mahler's work. 
                Like all things new, it will take time before the impact is fully 
                absorbed, but it is important, I think, to appreciate that there 
                are many ways to approach Mahler, some of which we haven't even 
                started to comprehend.
              
I'll probably 
                go back to Abbado's audio recording of the Sixth with the Berlin 
                Philharmonic Orchestra for regular listening, but this film is 
                a very valuable contribution to ”how” we listen to Mahler. There 
                may be more striking performances, but this is special because 
                it is a film, and sheds a uniquely sensitive light on the musicianship 
                that makes music possible.
                  
                  Anne Ozorio