This is beautiful music. So why don't we hear it more frequently? Bert 
                  Hagels, in his program note, suggests a shift in nineteenth-century 
                  concert programming away from virtuoso works, intended primarily 
                  to exploit the technical capacities of the violin (or the violinist), 
                  to abstract concerti by non-violinists; he specifically cites 
                  Beethoven, Mendelssohn and Brahms as favored composers. The 
                  explanation makes sense, and would seem to hold true today: 
                  among composers of the virtuoso persuasion, only Vieuxtemps 
                  and Wieniawski - along with Paganini, the pioneer of the genre 
                  - have kept a tenacious, if tenuous, hold on the repertory. 
                  On the evidence of this program, Bériot's melodic, richly colored 
                  concerti deserve at least as much respect, and exposure, as 
                  any pieces by those composers.
                
Paganini's influence is marked in Bériot's early B minor concerto, 
                  notably in the sharply etched, "Classical" rhythmic 
                  outlines of the first movement's rigorous opening ritornello, 
                  and the showy fireworks that it sets off. The central Andantino 
                  has an appealing, bittersweet lyricism, saved from mawkishness 
                  by touches of pungent instrumental color. The concluding Rondo 
                  russe, while not a Gypsy dance movement as such, has the 
                  sort of syncopated lilt associated with such movements.
                
In the D minor concerto, the composer attempts an integrated one-movement 
                  form with some success. The orchestral introduction doesn't 
                  suggest a condensed structure: the orchestra offers the conventional 
                  two themes, respectively forceful and lyrical, before the soloist 
                  takes them up. Instead of proceeding to the expected development 
                  section, however, the music subsides into a calming cantabile 
                  intermezzo, followed by a full recapitulation of the second 
                  theme and a coda. It's all quite accomplished, and despite the 
                  piece's relative brevity - it's just eleven-minutes-and-change 
                  in duration - the musical argument doesn't require further amplification.
                
The G major concerto of seven years later reverts to a standard three-movement 
                  pattern, but by now Bériot has come into his own as a melodist. 
                  The short-winded motifs of Paganini and his followers have been 
                  replaced by long, surging phrases that unfold in broad arcs 
                  to span the bars. More than once as I listened, the heady swellings 
                  of Lalo's Roi d'Ys overture came to mind. This score, 
                  at least, should appeal to modern, sophisticated audiences. 
                
              
Laurent Albrecht Breuninger is a persuasive advocate for these scores. 
                In the slow movements and equivalents, he phrases the arching 
                melodies sensitively, playing with an understated vibrancy. His 
                intonation and tone in the display passages are acceptable rather 
                than breathtaking most of the time, though he nails the most important 
                moments - exposed leaps and such - with thrilling accuracy. The 
                Northwest German Philharmonic under Beermann provide a colorful, 
                musically understanding backdrop, though the resonant bassi, 
                more Germanic than Gallic, underscore the foreshadowing of 
                the French post-Wagnerians. Gorgeous sound reproduction completes 
                the package.
                
                Stephen Francis Vasta