As a student at the 
                R.A.M. I was almost as ignorant of the 
                music of Gordon Crosse as I was of just 
                about everything else. The works of 
                his which I had heard, mostly through 
                rare BBC broadcasts, I remember as finding 
                highly accessible. Creative output is 
                so often reflected in personality, and 
                while he was less often to be found 
                fraternising in the Academy bar than 
                some, the lessons I had with Gordon 
                Crosse as member of a whole bunch of 
                thickies in the G.R.S.M. course were 
                as interesting and accessible as his 
                music. He must have despaired at our 
                opaque lack of intellectual fitness; 
                but never let on, and always held the 
                respect of the class. 
              
              Rob Barnett’s review 
                of this disc covers many of the salient 
                points with regard to the background 
                to these pieces, so I will largely restrict 
                myself to a personal response. 
              
              Ariadne, for 
                solo oboe and a colourful ensemble of 
                12 players makes a grander and more 
                spectacular impression than its title 
                might suggest. The music is intense 
                and never really lets up, maintaining 
                a nervous vibration in even the slower 
                passages: Crosse clearly revels in the 
                athletic manoeuvrability of the relatively 
                compact ensemble. The ‘coarse tone’ 
                section in the second movement is a 
                highly convincing eastern-European/Mediterranean 
                sounding moment, and with eloquent playing 
                from Sarah Francis and the whole ensemble 
                this is a wonderful piece to have lying 
                around in one’s collection. 
              
              Peter Dickinson wrote: 
                "In 1966 Crosse conquered the Three 
                Choirs Festival with Changes: a Nocturnal 
                Cycle [Argo LP ZRG 656]. This fastidiously 
                chosen anthology of poems was the basis 
                for a 50-minute choral work extending 
                the Britten tradition in a personal 
                way. Apart from its richly imaginative 
                orchestral textures it shows Crosse 
                as a melodist too. Its neglect by our 
                choral societies is simply incomprehensible." 
                Well, while I might agree wholeheartedly 
                with Dickinson’s sentiment, I can to 
                a certain extent understand why such 
                a demanding work would be a reluctant 
                choice for choral societies. This is 
                one of those pieces which requires strength 
                at all levels, and would always require 
                a considerable investment of time and 
                resources to be given full justice.
              
              Full justice is what 
                it receives on this recording however, 
                and Lyrita has done everyone a large 
                favour by making it available once more. 
                Crosse’s strengths in orchestration 
                are immediately apparent, and in his 
                own note to the work he acknowledges 
                that it is ‘concerned with variety and 
                contrast’, an aspect which is given 
                greatest pungence through the use of 
                the orchestra, which includes a large 
                percussion section and the full works 
                from the other sections. Crosse also 
                admits having to ‘work hard for unity’ 
                in a piece with many short sections, 
                but in the final reckoning this never 
                seems to arise as a problem – in any 
                case, I never had the impression of 
                a composer trying hard, or becoming 
                aware of procedural workings-out. In 
                his own summing up, Crosse in essence 
                shows what our approach to the work 
                should be: ‘…with the aim of communicating 
                enjoyment I tried to enjoy myself. I… 
                concentrated on opening my ears and 
                mind to simple ideas.’
              
              These ‘simple ideas’ 
                do sometimes have the ring of Britten 
                about them. Take the children’s chorus 
                Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, 
                which in which the cadences and melodic 
                shapes of the elder master are unmistakeable. 
                There are occasional tinges of Tippett 
                in the orchestral filigrees which pop 
                through now and again early on, maybe 
                a whiff of Shostakovich in the choir 
                in the Bellman’s Song, that 
                kind of thing: but in essence this is 
                very much a personal odyssey, and in 
                any case such associations are always 
                a response based on personal experience. 
                This is in no way a shopping list of 
                references and influences, and I have 
                certainly come through the listening 
                sessions invigorated and resolved to 
                ‘swim in wine, and turn upon the toe…’ 
                rather than dwell upon ‘The pear doth 
                rot, the plum doth fall, The snow dissolves, 
                and so must all.’ 
              
              As for the performances, 
                I can single out Jennifer Vyvyan for 
                sheer gorgeousness with those high notes 
                in the Nurse’s Song and beauty 
                of restraint in The Door of Death, 
                and it certainly sounds as if the LSO 
                are playing out of their skins. There 
                is an intense English straightness about 
                some of the diction, and I can imagine 
                the delivery of such lines as ‘Hey nonny 
                no!’ being done a little less in the 
                old BBC received pronunciation these 
                days. That this kind of thing stands 
                out at all only emphasises the international 
                drama and strength of the music as it 
                stands. English it is of course, but, 
                far from advocating some kind of streetwise 
                interpretation; the weight of the music 
                still takes us to places far beyond 
                well modulated tones and Mr. Cholmondeley-Warner. 
                For choral societies looking for an 
                alternative to A Child of Our Time 
                or Noye’s Fludde I would 
                say – go for it! 
              Dominy Clements
              See also review 
                by Rob Barnett
              The 
                Lyrita Catalogue