In a review of MSR’s 
                recording of Joshua Pierce in Brahms’s 
                Second Piano Concerto I noted the very 
                piano-dominating sound (see review). 
                It put me in mind of the titanically 
                over recorded piano-and-coaches efforts 
                of the 1950s. It now appears, as if 
                in confirmation, either that Pierce 
                insists on this kind of balance or that 
                MSR does – or between them they both 
                agree that that’s how they like it. 
                It’s not how I like it but perhaps that’s 
                a less pressing matter. 
              
 
              
The disappointment 
                is that Pierce is a fine player. I found 
                his Brahms 2 less than convincing but 
                have heard his Brahms 1, which is much 
                better. He seems to record extensively 
                in Slovakia and in the Czech Republic 
                and it’s to Eastern Slovakia we trek 
                for this disc of concertante pieces. 
                The State Philharmonic is based in Košice, 
                a city with a beautiful centre and a 
                horrible railway station. The orchestra 
                and its conductor Bystrík 
                Režucha seem to have built up something 
                of a relationship with Pierce, who seems 
                to make frequent visits there to perform. 
                These performances were recorded between 
                2000 and 2003. 
              
 
              
The Weber used to be 
                performed rather more often than is 
                now the case. Pierce plays it convincingly 
                enough but in comparison with a portraitist 
                of Robert Casadesus’s class (APR, live 
                with Barbirolli in New York in the 1930s) 
                he is apt to sound over-robust. The 
                Frenchman plays the limpid treble runs 
                with Mozartian grace whereas Pierce 
                employs self-conscious rubati and tends 
                to dispatch the runs with a certain 
                mechanical indifference. But it really 
                is no good going to the effort of recording 
                at all if the orchestra is so subservient 
                and only pokes up its head for tuttis. 
              
 
              
Reinecke’s Concertstück 
                in G minor is a most fascinating work. 
                It was written in 1848 and whilst the 
                notes point to the influence of Chopin 
                and Schumann there are other more interesting 
                things going on as well. Certainly much 
                of the piano figuration is Chopinesque 
                but there are definite intimations of 
                Brahms here and Lisztian decorativeness. 
                Rachmaninoff was an omnivorous virtuoso-executant 
                and I’m sure he must have known this 
                as well as Brahms – there are fascinating 
                moments when one hears his fingerprints. 
                Pierce plays with great rhythmic vitality 
                and energy but whilst his passagework 
                is crystal clear the orchestral detail 
                is once more subservient. 
              
 
              
Hummel, Bratislava-born, 
                is now something of a Slovak national 
                icon. His Introduzione and Rondo 
                Brillant in A major was probably 
                written earlier than the putative date 
                of 1814. It ripples with filigree and 
                shameless panache. Decorative and elegant 
                it also has a bracing and beautiful 
                lyricism that invites the questing pianist. 
                Czerny’s opus is far more opulently 
                virtuosic than Hummel’s. There’s a ceaseless 
                exploration of pianistics here and for 
                fourteen minutes the soloist parades 
                his external credentials to a doubtless 
                adoring public. Finally the Mendelssohn 
                – which is perhaps the most familiar 
                of the quintet of works. The playing 
                as such is good but the recorded balance, 
                need I add, is not. 
                This is the reason why MSR should consider 
                its priorities in concerto and concertante 
                recording; Pierce as well. 
              
Jonathan Woolf