Pascal Rogé 
                is now recording Debussy for the second 
                time. His Decca cycle was much appreciated 
                in its day. This time he takes an expansive, 
                deeply considered view. On the whole 
                I like my Debussy more volatile but 
                all this is beautifully played and warmly 
                textured. 
              
 
              
In the most important 
                work here, "Estampes", 
                the first of Debussy’s works which is 
                wholly impressionistic in sound, Rogé’s 
                timings are similar to those of the 
                elderly Claudio Arrau. Yet, while Arrau 
                is more interventionist and can seem 
                mannered, he is ever the great communicator. 
                There is all the mystery of the Far 
                East in his "Pagodes" 
                and his Latin-American birthright no 
                doubt helps him to give a sinuous lift 
                to "La Soirée dans Grenade". 
                Furthermore, it is Rogé not Arrau 
                who, in the interests of expressiveness, 
                allows some hiccoughs in the gentle 
                pattering of the raindrops in "Jardins 
                sous la pluie", even robbing 
                the closing page of its quivering excitement. 
                Arrau mainly avoids this. With Arrau 
                we also hear plainly that the pieces 
                are respectively about three different 
                parts of the world. 
              
 
              
Put on Gieseking after 
                this and his "Pagodes" 
                may seem manically fast and excitable. 
                When you have taken time to adjust you 
                realize it is Gieseking who more than 
                anyone takes the notes of the page and 
                creates sheer magic. It may seem perverse 
                to stick with a recording made over 
                fifty years ago but what else can I 
                say? 
              
 
              
Some have questioned 
                the supremacy of Gieseking in this music; 
                my colleague Jonathan Woolf has had 
                some interesting things to say on the 
                subject. Well, some Gieseking performances 
                are more supreme than others. His "Estampes" 
                seem to me to show him at his most inspired, 
                though I can accept Arrau as evidence 
                that there are other ways. By the side 
                of either of them Rogé seems 
                a little pallid. The difference between 
                excellence and greatness, I suppose. 
              
 
              
Elsewhere differences 
                are smaller. In the first of the Children’s 
                Corner pieces, "Doctor Gradus 
                ad Parnassum", I wondered if 
                any marginal advantages in Gieseking’s 
                playing warranted the sacrifice of up-to-date 
                sound. But as you get acclimatized, 
                what pellucid light still hovers over 
                those old recordings after so many years. 
                In "Jimbo’s Lullaby" 
                Rogé’s slower tempo makes the 
                music sound melancholy. Gieseking explains 
                better what Debussy meant by marking 
                the beginning "doux et un peu gauche". 
                He sounds like a child picking out the 
                notes one by one. He finds a droll humour 
                in the piece which I find more interesting. 
              
 
              
For once Gieseking 
                is slower in the "Serenade of 
                the Doll" and gives it an incomparable 
                elegance. Honours are about even in 
                "The Snow is Dancing" 
                but Gieseking finds more character in 
                the last two pieces. 
              
 
              
In early Debussy, Rogé 
                is fluently attractive. I didn’t have 
                a comparison for the "Suite 
                bergamasque". I much enjoyed 
                it though I have an idea I would like 
                it all a shade faster. Full marks for 
                not playing "Clair de lune" 
                as if it’s the soundtrack to "Frankie 
                & Johnny", but maybe it could 
                flow a little more without gushing. 
                In the "Ballade" he 
                eases into each change of harmony in 
                a way which rather draws attention to 
                the fact that the piece is made entirely 
                of two-bar segments. A more free-flowing 
                approach might have hidden this. The 
                Mazurka is nicely done. In the 
                Arabesques the pianist on a disc 
                claimed to be by Joyce Hatto is a little 
                more upfront, finding more capricious 
                humour in the second. Ironically, there 
                have been suggestions that the "Hatto" 
                version of the first Arabesque is Rogé’s 
                own earlier Decca recording. 
              
 
              
"La Plus que 
                lente" brings the only performance 
                here I actively dislike, too slow and 
                pulled-around. Gieseking is here too 
                fast and unsettled. Which leaves the 
                "Hatto" as the performance 
                that succeeds perfectly in maintaining 
                a gentle waltz movement all through, 
                in spite of some quite extreme rubato. 
                I look forward to knowing who the pianist 
                really is. In "Le Petit Nègre" 
                Gieseking is too impatient by far while 
                Rogé is delightful. In general 
                Gieseking’s versions of the less well-known 
                pieces, which he rarely if ever played 
                outside the studio, suggest all too 
                brief an encounter. 
              
 
              
Altogether an excellent 
                production, with recording and booklet 
                notes by Roger Nichols worthy of it. 
                But in the last resort not really memorable. 
              
 
              
Christopher Howell