Tomás 
                  Kramreiter was born in 1943 in Madrid, the son of the Viennese 
                  architect Robert Kramreiter-Klein (1905-1965). His family returned 
                  to Vienna in 1950. He studied at the Wiener Musikakademie, the 
                  Salzburg Mozarteum and with Nadia Boulanger in Paris. He made 
                  his début at the age of 12 and has been a specialist in the 
                  German and Russian romantic repertoire. Previous to the present 
                  disc he set down some Tchaikovsky for EMI Columbia; later came 
                  Rachmaninov’s Second Sonata for Jecklin and, much more recently 
                  (2003), a disc of music by the Swiss late-romantic Paul Juon. 
                  He appears to be still active, though not as much as he deserves 
                  if he still plays as well as he does here.
                Incidentally, 
                  something rather strange happened while I was googling around 
                  for information. One of the hits led me to a page of the Musical 
                  Times of December 1973, listing London concerts in January 1974. 
                  I couldn’t find the name of Kramreiter there, but I did find 
                  the name of Joyce Hatto, whose Liszt recital on January 11 was 
                  listed. Has somebody been having fun? To be fair, though, without 
                  authorization I could only view the first of the pages posted 
                  so it is possible that Kramreiter played later in the month. 
                  Even if this were so, the fact that the hit led to Hatto as 
                  well is curious.
                I 
                  haven’t looked up my original review yet, but I remember being 
                  very impressed at the pianist’s ability to “tier” the textures, 
                  to create that dialogue between the different strands which 
                  is so essential in Rachmaninov. And I mean “dialogue”, not just 
                  subjugating one line to another, though would that a good many 
                  other pianists could do even that. This is a work that teems 
                  with notes, yet every single one is shown to have a purpose 
                  and a place.
                Equally 
                  remarkable is Kramreiter’s control over the structure. Each 
                  event is fully characterized, yet he never loses shape of the 
                  whole. The music flows, surges, languishes, but always moves 
                  proudly onward. Patrician playing based on Rachmaninovian first 
                  principles.  
                Despite 
                  an attractive opening and some fine ideas later on, the Medtner 
                  “Sonata Reminiscenza” appeared on first acquaintance to contain 
                  some more workaday passages which made it seem a little diffuse. 
                  But Medtner’s works notoriously start to haunt you only after 
                  several hearings and the work is certainly worth the attention 
                  of those interested in late romantic piano music. I am still 
                  puzzled as to why anyone should have called him the “Russian 
                  Brahms”. I am sure that the performance plays its part in removing 
                  any Brahmsian heaviness which is potentially present, for it 
                  shows the same textural and structural qualities to be found 
                  in the Rachmaninov. Perhaps because I was less engrossed by 
                  the music, I got a little tired of the slightly shallow brightness 
                  of the Fazioli piano used, something that didn’t worry me in 
                  the Rachmaninov.
                All 
                  the same, a very fine disc. After Nojima, Kramreiter is maybe 
                  the most interesting pianistic find among the “Hatto” pianists 
                  I’ve investigated.
                The 
                  Hattification 
                No 
                  time-manipulation. The sound has been made wetter and softer 
                  with a touch of reverb in attempt to make the Fazioli sound 
                  like Rachmaninov’s favoured Abbey Road Steinway. The difference 
                  at the opening of the second movement is very striking.  With 
                  a slightly vaguer sound-picture to boot the attempt may be convincing 
                  enough to ears already primed to expect a Steinway. For better 
                  or worse, I didn’t question it at the time. Heard alongside 
                  each other, the tighter, drier sound of the original is more 
                  realistic. If Kramreiter should resume his recording career, 
                  I hope a Steinway will be made available to him.
                My 
                  original review of the “Hatto” Rachmaninov was mainly concerned 
                  with Mussorgsky’s “Pictures” – now identified as Campanella 
                  – with which it was coupled. Here is the part dedicated to the 
                  Sonata:
                If you look at the front cover you might think you are getting 
                  only the "Pictures", but turn the package over and 
                  you find there is the little matter of a fill-up – Rachmaninov’s 
                  rare First Sonata. Since many collectors who have at least one 
                  "Pictures" may not have this, it provides a strong 
                  additional incentive for buying another "Pictures". 
                  Here is an expansive, but far from sprawling work (at least 
                  as it is played here) from Rachmaninov’s maturity. Hatto has 
                  long been a noted exponent of Rachmaninov and she captures finely 
                  the ebb and flow of the composer’s inspiration, neither screwing 
                  the pressure too manically nor dawdling luxuriantly, and is 
                  in complete control of the complex textures, replete with his 
                  usual countermelodies. 
                I have sometimes found that Concert Artist’s insistence on 
                  recordings with a concert hall perspective produces slightly 
                  pallid results but the results here are impressively full and 
                  should disappoint no one. 
                Christopher 
                  Howell