Russian music was 
                one of the specialities of Serge Koussevitzky. He is, perhaps, 
                less celebrated as a champion of British music. However, in the 
                interesting note accompanying this CD Robert Matthew-Walker points 
                out that the maestro led the American première of Walton’s Belshazzar’s 
                Feast in 1932 – I’ll bet that was exciting – and commissioned 
                both Peter Grimes and Spring Symphony from Benjamin 
                Britten. During his tenure of the Boston podium he conducted symphonies 
                by Bax and Vaughan Williams. Nonetheless, I was surprised to find 
                him leading RVW’s Fifth for, superficially, I’d have expected 
                him to be more attuned to the more volatile Fourth or Sixth. 
              
However, on receiving 
                this CD for review I couldn’t help but play first Francesca 
                da Rimini. This is one of my favourite Tchaikovsky scores 
                and I’ve heard some notable recordings of it down the years, including 
                readings by Barbirolli and Stokowski. This urgent, incandescent 
                reading by Koussevitzky will become another personal favourite, 
                I’m sure, despite the inevitable sonic limitations. Koussevitzky 
                generates tremendous excitement in the turbulent outer sections 
                of the work. In between, the great central love melody has wonderful 
                sweep and passion. This is a virtuoso performance by a virtuoso 
                conductor and it’s thrilling. Unfortunately the sound is cut off 
                with an almost brutal abruptness after the last chord – something 
                which afflicts all the recordings on this disc. It comes as quite 
                a shock to have the ambience ended in this way. I wonder if this 
                is a feature of the original sources with which the Guild transfer 
                engineers had to work? 
              
The Mussorgsky pieces 
                  also fare very well in Koussevitzky’s hands. He generates demonic 
                  energy in the first few minutes of A Night on the Bare Mountain. 
                  The Boston heavy brass and percussion play with great power 
                  and the high woodwinds screech away. In the visceral excitement 
                  a few momentary imprecisions are of little consequence. After 
                  the chimes of the dawn bell [7:06] there’s an uneasy calm about 
                  the performance. The principal clarinet contributes a doleful 
                  solo – I wonder if it’s the same player who made a notable showing 
                  in the central section of Francesca? I should say that 
                  surface noise is quite intrusive in the last few minutes of 
                  this piece.
                
              
The Khovanshchina 
                Prelude is another success. Here Koussevitzky distils excellent 
                atmosphere and the BSO playing is highly concentrated, not least 
                in the fine oboe solo. The hushed ending, starting with a pianissimo 
                clarinet solo, is really well managed; it’s just a shame that 
                the Boston audience make such a bronchial contribution to the 
                proceedings. 
              
But, since Russian 
                music was very much Koussevitzky’s métier, I suspect that 
                for many collectors the prime interest in this release will lie, 
                as it did for me, in the reading of the Vaughan Williams symphony. 
                This, we are told, is one of two performances of the work that 
                Koussevitzky gave in the 1946/7 season. One thing that it’s important 
                to note is that this performance was given within four years of 
                the first unveiling of the work in public so Koussevitzky’s reading 
                is, at best, lightly influenced by precedent. To me it felt very 
                idiomatic. 
              
The first movement 
                has breadth but the music is also invested with the requisite 
                flow. Perhaps there isn’t quite the degree of gentle rubato, an 
                easing here and there, that we’ve become used to by hearing conductors 
                like Boult unfold the work but it still sounds pretty convincing 
                to me. The BSO strings sound radiant, even through the elderly 
                recording. When, in the passage between 4:45 and 6:20 in this 
                performance, the music becomes appreciably faster there’s admirable 
                urgency and tautness in the playing. The main climax (from 7:24) 
                is noble but, very rightly, Koussevitzky maintains forward impetus. 
              
The gossamer lightness 
                  that’s essential to a successful rendition of the scherzo is 
                  splendidly realised here. The luminous string chords that usher 
                  in the glorious slow movement are weighted to perfection. The 
                  playing in this third movement is wonderful all round – the 
                  wind soloists are particularly distinguished – not for nothing 
                  is the BSO regarded as the aristocrat of American orchestras. 
                  The climax of the movement, around 8:30 is majestic and then 
                  the music ends as serenely as it began. Once again, I’m afraid, 
                  the coughers in the audience do their best to distract us.
                
              
The finale is quite 
                fleet and there’s an urgency to the performance that I like very 
                much and find refreshing. I admire Koussevitzky’s approach to 
                this movement, which reminds us that even in his seventies RVW 
                and his music still possessed great vigour. Eventually, conductor 
                and orchestra give us a serene survey of the closing pages of 
                the symphony (from 5:40 and, even more, from 6:18). The strings 
                phrase generously and the very end of the work glows beautifully. 
                Overall this is a very convincing performance of the symphony. 
                I don’t know if it has circulated on unofficial labels in the 
                past but I’m only sorry that it’s taken sixty years for this reading 
                to become generally available. 
              
Guild offer us here 
                an excellent collection of Koussevitzky performances. It’s no 
                surprise to find him in his element in Russian repertoire but 
                it’s marvellous to find him equally effective in a quintessentially 
                English score. The sound isn’t ideal but, given its age and that 
                these are not studio recordings, it’s perfectly adequate. The 
                excellence and excitement of these performances, which I presume 
                were all given in Symphony Hall, Boston come across very well. 
                This valuable collection gives us another reminder of how formidable 
                was the partnership between Serge Koussevitzky and the orchestra 
                he led with such distinction for a quarter of a century.
                
                John Quinn