Search MusicWeb Here

selling Internationally

aBantock 4CDs £16 post-free


2CDs £9 post-free

New! CRD

£9 post-free

  Founder: Len Mullenger
Editor-in-Chief: Rob Barnett


Some items
to consider


  • Bantock Khayyam
  • Arthur Butterworth Symphonies
  • William Wordsworth Symphonies
  • Sir John in Love
  • Violin Concertos


Vadim Gluzman - A quite extraordinarily good disc

This impressed me mightily

Shostakovich 5, 8 9
Great concentration

Let me tell you
Stratospheric Barbara Hannigan
Birmingham and BBC Proms

Berkeley - Authenticity

Highly Expressive

NØRGÅRD Stunning

Superbly played

One to treasure

One of the finest American
choral-orchestral works

from strength to strength

inspired choice

Book and CD £12

Book + 4CDs £33



Pristine Classical



Ludwig van BEETHOVEN (1770-1827)
Violin Sonata No. 9 in A major Op.47 Kreutzer (1803) [30:23]
Jacques Thibaud (violin)
Alfred Cortot (piano)
rec. Salle Chopin and Salle Pleyel, Paris, 27-29 May 1929


Pristine Audio’s XR technology is a claimed miracle of the transfer engineer’s art. Go to for specifics. Andrew Rose claims that pre-1945 78s now have their audible upper frequency range increased from between 5-6 kHz to somewhere between 11-13 kHz. He also goes further, boldly announcing that these transfers render “all previous transfers and restorations …entirely obsolete.” Since he’s embarking on a wide programme of XR restorations this is a defiant claim. He takes a modern recording of the work in question and utilises it as a reference file – as he did in bass-stiffening and percussion-enhancing the famous Heward Moeran Symphony recording. I’ve just reviewed his XR work on Kathleen Long’s post-war, 78-based, Fauré Deccas (see review). The sonic improvements in immediacy were certainly apparent.  Here however he takes on a much earlier 1929 Paris classic, the Thibaud-Cortot Kreutzer Sonata.

After the science what do one’s ears tell one? I set up an A-B-C test and took my (Italian) HMV DB1328-1331 – the one that announces the violinist as a certain G. Thibaud – and stacked it up against Mark Obert-Thorn’s transfer on Biddulph LAB028 (a 1990 transfer) and the XR. Then as usual in this kind of examination I continually switched between the three. The results to my ears remained constant. The noise suppression – Cedar-ing I suppose – leaves a grainy, steely subculture of sound. Fair enough. The main point of interest however is the XR work itself. Doubtless Andrew Rose would say I can’t hear properly – or hear what I want to hear. Well, so be it, but I find this, after the Long, rather disappointing. To me this transfer sounds curiously synthetic and treble starved; the constriction also, in a way I can’t explain, seems to affect Thibaud’s tone, which seems fractionally to become cloudy, as it certainly doesn’t on the 78 or in Obert-Thorn’s quite noisy but essentially unfussy transfer.

In the end it doesn’t matter about graphs, reference copies, Natural Sound, predictive elements and finding harmonics embedded in high frequency noise – it depends on how the transfer appeals. I appreciate Rose will not agree. Many other people also won’t agree and will enjoy this – download it and see. If possible have access to another transfer and better still go and listen to the 78. I liked Rose’s work with the Long Deccas but not this Kreutzer. It’s going to be trial and error, one at a time it seems, in my XR experience.

Jonathan Woolf



Gerard Hoffnung CDs

Advertising on

Donate and get a free CD

New Releases

Naxos Classical

Musicweb sells the following labels
Acte Préalable
Nimbus Alliance
Prima voce
Red Priest
Toccata Classics

Follow us on Twitter

Subscribe to our free weekly review listing

Sample: See what you will get

Editorial Board
MusicWeb International
Editor in Chief
Rob Barnett
Seen & Heard
Editor Emeritus
   Bill Kenny
Editor in Chief
MusicWeb Webmaster
   David Barker
MusicWeb Founder
   Len Mullenger

Return to Review Index

Untitled Document

Reviews from previous months
Join the mailing list and receive a hyperlinked weekly update on the discs reviewed. details
We welcome feedback on our reviews. Please use the Bulletin Board
Please paste in the first line of your comments the URL of the review to which you refer.