Whenever I review one 
                of Michael Tilson Thomas’s mew San Francisco 
                Mahler recordings I resolve at the outset 
                that I will not mention the name Leonard 
                Bernstein. Looking back I seem to have 
                had mixed success in my resolve and 
                you will see that I have already failed 
                this time. The reason for this is clear 
                once again because the ghost of Tilson 
                Thomas’s admired mentor hovers over 
                at least parts of this new recording 
                and, as is often the case, secondhand 
                clothes never look right on the new 
                wearer. The main problem lies mostly, 
                but not exclusively, in the first movement 
                where the funeral march passages, so 
                crucially important to establishing 
                the initial mood of tragedy and despair 
                that will in the end be overturned by 
                Mahler, are tampered with by MTT in 
                much the same way that Bernstein did. 
                The difference is that Bernstein carried 
                it all off because he seemed to have 
                absorbed the music into himself so much 
                that it became part of the whole experience. 
                I never quite liked it very much or 
                approved, but it didn’t bother me too 
                much. Here with Tilson Thomas these 
                mannerisms seem fixed to the surface 
                of the music rather than embedded in 
                it. This is a march and marches have 
                to be regular - fundamentally rhythmic. 
                Anyone marching behind this coffin would 
                keep having to hesitate to fall back 
                into step. There is also a tendency 
                for the woodwind to be too "clipped" 
                in some of their phrasing that, at times, 
                suggests an air of jauntiness. I think 
                I know what Tilson Thomas is aiming 
                at - a kind of military brusqueness 
                - but I think he is just complicating 
                the movement with too many ideas when 
                less would have been "more". 
                Compare him with Rudolf Schwarz and 
                you get the march idea straightaway. 
                These woodwind players are very good, 
                but I do miss the unique "keening" 
                sound that Barbirolli gets from the 
                New Philharmonia though that is unique. 
                It’s not all negative, though. The clarity 
                of the recording and playing of the 
                bass end of the music, especially in 
                the coda, is impressive and moving. 
                There will be some Mahlerites who will, 
                nevertheless, warm to this whole approach 
                to the first movement, but I am not 
                one. 
              
 
              
This mindset is maintained 
                in the second movement, just as it should 
                be and has the effect of knitting together 
                the two movements well enough. Indeed 
                the opening is excellent with any slight 
                lack of wildness more than made up for 
                in trenchancy by the digging in of the 
                lower strings. As he starts out Tilson 
                Thomas puts not a foot wrong in what 
                is one of the most challenging of movements 
                Mahler ever wrote. The clearly balanced 
                recording and excellent playing again 
                picks out every contrapuntal line up 
                to and including the central monody 
                of cellos which is treated with a mellow 
                nostalgia that is most affecting. It 
                is from about now that the interference 
                I noted in the first movement comes 
                back to cause more problems. The predilection 
                for "stop-go" tempo change, 
                this time on a grander scale, causes 
                Tilson Thomas to lose his way a little 
                through the complex argument. He drags 
                out the tempo prior to the chorale’s 
                approach and also seems determined to 
                make as much noise as possible with 
                the heavy brass, superb though they 
                are. Then he hurries up the chorale 
                only to slam on the breaks for the collapse 
                at the end. It is all impressively achieved 
                by the orchestra but I think it overheats 
                music that is already white-hot without 
                any more stoking. 
              
 
              
The change of mood 
                demanded by the Scherzo is well delivered 
                because this movement is easily the 
                finest part of the performance. This 
                is a movement where a flexibility of 
                tempo, where a "stop-go" that 
                is confidently delivered, can enhance 
                this movement and so it proves. Tilson 
                Thomas allows himself to illuminate 
                every little highway and byway of this 
                music and even though he slows down 
                in some of the passages to a remarkable 
                degree he never loses sight of the bigger 
                picture or that element of dance that 
                is so important. The horn solos are 
                all superb, gloriously ripe and life-enhancing. 
                Mahler worried that conductors would 
                take this movement too fast and so I 
                think he would have liked this performance 
                very much, as do I. Here is Mahler in 
                "full leaf and flower" and 
                glorious it is to hear even at a duration 
                of over nineteen minutes. 
              
 
              
The Adagietto starts 
                with a wistful serenity about it but 
                as it progresses the slowing down that 
                Mahler certainly asks for is taken far 
                too literally and also the mannerisms 
                in the wrong place creep back in. Simple, 
                heartfelt music gets distorted by trying 
                to wring out extra emotion. When you 
                are glad for the arrival of the last 
                movement something is not quite right 
                about the Adagietto you have just heard. 
                As it happens the last movement is delivered 
                most winningly and, with the excellence 
                of the orchestra in every department 
                keeping everything bowling along, the 
                recording strides home with verve and 
                confidence. The fact that the Adagietto 
                recalls in this movement don’t seem 
                to really register says more about the 
                performance the former movement received 
                than the latter. Let it be said that 
                the end wins through well after what 
                has been a patchy performance. 
              
 
              
It always seems to 
                be damning with faint praise when I 
                find myself making the caveat that those 
                who are collecting a particular cycle 
                of Mahler symphonies can buy a current 
                instalment with confidence. It isn’t 
                meant that way but it does mean that 
                I would not recommend the individual 
                issue of that particular work over and 
                above any rival versions. As far as 
                I can tell only the Fourth Symphony 
                in this Tilson Thomas cycle can have 
                that accolade and this Fifth does not 
                equal it. It is, therefore, another 
                worthy addition to a fine cycle for 
                those collecting it, but other collectors 
                need to look to Barshai (Brilliant Classics 
                92205), Rudolf Schwarz (Everest EVC9032), 
                Barbirolli (EMI GROC CDM5 669102) and 
                Shipway (Membran 222845) to name but 
                four absolutely outstanding Fifths with 
                the first two remaining my personal 
                favourites for their overall grasp of 
                Mahler’s greatest work. 
              
 
              
For the collectors 
                of the Tilson Thomas cycle, a fine Fifth. 
                For everyone else, look elsewhere. 
              
 
              
Tony Duggan