This is an important 
                  disc for admirers of Beecham’s credentials as an elevated exponent 
                  of the Sibelian symphonic canon. Neither symphony was exactly 
                  uncultivated by the conductor who left recordings of both. Indeed 
                  his travails over the Fourth are the stuff of legend and have 
                  been well documented. It may have been that which gave rise 
                  to the allegation that Sibelius referred to him as a first fiddle 
                  conductor but it’s certainly the case that relations between 
                  the two were more than cordial. If there are no explosive revelations 
                  here, in view of the known recorded evidence, in quite the same 
                  way that there was with regard to the recent Stokowski-Cala 
                  re-release of the first two symphonies then that’s because, 
                  as noted, we know much of Beecham’s approach through commercial 
                  and live performances and also because of the distinctly less 
                  than spectacular sound accorded the Fourth.
                This is a definite 
                  pity because if we contrast this October 1951 performance, recorded 
                  live off-air in the Criterion Theatre with the BBC Symphony, 
                  with both the pre-War commercial Columbia and, even more interestingly, 
                  the slightly later 1955 RPO live performance we find that it 
                  could very well be the best of the three. The orchestra had 
                  just lost Boult, removed on reaching retirement age, and not 
                  a conductor especially partial to Beecham. They are on fine 
                  form, strong and characterful and having begun to recover from 
                  post-War privation. I’m not sure who was the principal cello 
                  then but he makes an eloquent sound at the opening and one should 
                  on no account overlook the wind principals who are so adept 
                  in the first movement. The powerful peroration in the Poco 
                  vivace is spine-tingling stuff and Beecham’s sense of rhythmic 
                  impetus courses throughout the finale which becomes, in his 
                  hands, something of a master class in the screwing up and relaxation 
                  of tension. To demonstrate that his ideas in this work remained 
                  fluid, one needs to point out the far greater sense of concentration 
                  in the later RPO reading, also live, where he tightens the first 
                  and the third movements by almost a minute each and drives through 
                  the finale that much quicker as well. It’s clearly not the case 
                  that this 1951 BBC reading is in any sense provisional, rather 
                  that here was a particular occasion that gave rise to a specific 
                  sense of greater expressive and expansive response. The deficiencies 
                  of the recording are however palpable: hiss, a constricted spatial 
                  response, a rather shallow sound and some pits and damage to 
                  the grooves. These deficiencies are duly noted in the documentation 
                  and are so here; the performance however is superb and I urge 
                  you to hear it.
                The Sixth is really 
                  no less fine. Beecham is inclined to be trashed as a symphonic 
                  conductor for some perceived lack of formal, symphonic control. 
                  There’s a degree of truth in that in repertoire with which he 
                  was broadly unsympathetic but – first fiddle jibes apart – it’s 
                  really not remotely the case in his Sibelius recordings, all 
                  of which demonstrate acute structural control and a canny sense 
                  of rhythmic tension. The Sixth was recorded live at one of Beecham’s 
                  very few Prom appearances in 1954 with his RPO, an orchestra 
                  seemingly built to respond to the Sixth. The strings have great 
                  purity, the winds marvellously evocative individuality and so 
                  far as Beecham is concerned he reprises those qualities that 
                  informed the Fourth: dramatic sweep, control of individual nuance, 
                  mastery of rubato, warmth, and tensile accumulation. The result 
                  is a wholly symphonic utterance rendered without dislocation 
                  or fracture, with incidental beauties serving the greater whole. 
                  It also attests to things so often missed about Beecham: sheer 
                  hard work and preparation. 
                The Sixth is in 
                  much better sound than the Fourth – some coughs are of relatively 
                  trifling account. The usual fine notes from Graham Melville-Mason 
                  are another asset. You may be deterred by reservations concerning 
                  the sound quality of the Fourth but perseverance will brings 
                  its rich reward, especially because this is the finest Beecham 
                  Fourth that I know.
                Jonathan Woolf 
                
                see also Review 
                  by Rob Barnett