This brace of Brahms 
                Sonata discs shows the difference between 
                a thoroughly competent reading and one 
                versed in the art of making things happen. 
                Almond and Wolfram start with the disadvantage 
                of a very clangorous acoustic. It has 
                the effect sometimes of making the piano 
                too loud and the violin too quiet. But 
                they are experienced chamber players 
                and form part of a wider and like-minded 
                group, An die Musik, whose praises I 
                have sung here before now. 
              
 
              
In the Op.108 Sonata, 
                and despite Wolfram’s often very assertive 
                chording, things can get rather muted 
                and the passagework becalmed. Almond 
                has a rather thin tone and makes few 
                obviously expressive gestures. This 
                pays dividends if you want a regretful 
                rather than a passionately controlled 
                slow movement but tension flags elsewhere, 
                even in the Scherzo. The Op.78 Sonata 
                is pretty similar; the first movement 
                pizzicato doesn’t really sound, and 
                some of the phrasing in this work is 
                deadpan to the point of unimaginative. 
                Things seem slower than they actually 
                are because of a certain rhythmic lassitude 
                and lack of sharp corners. In Op.100 
                they take too much of a moderato 
                approach to the Allegro amabile opening 
                and throughout – even the very slowly 
                taken central movement – they are paragraphal 
                and not nearly colourful enough tonally. 
              
 
              
The Ringborg-Kilström 
                team make a much better impression. 
                Ringborg, whose approach to Roman’s 
                solo violin works, the Assaggi, was 
                so successful – see my review 
                - is an adept player, though he should 
                fight a tendency to swelling tone. He 
                has a fast-ish vibrato and approaches 
                Op.108 with a certain soloistic panache. 
                Whilst the acoustic isn’t especially 
                warm or overtly attractive – it’s distinctly 
                chilly and encourages tonal shrillness 
                – he and Kilström take the same 
                basic tempo as Almond and Wolfram but 
                they sound consistently fleeter and 
                more engaging; their reflexes are faster, 
                their tones full of greater colour, 
                and the violinist isn’t afraid to voice 
                some attractive expressive touches In 
                Op.100 they’re attractively subtle and 
                though Ringborg sets off at slightly 
                too fast a tempo in the central movement 
                he soon settles down. Op.78 shows renewed 
                superiority to the American pair with 
                a greater availability of just those 
                components that make music of this kind 
                live – colour, rhythm, metrical effects. 
              
I wouldn’t care to 
                rank the Ringborg-Kilström team 
                in a field so wide. I would say that 
                the recordings of Suk-Katchen, Grumiaux-Hajdu 
                and Goldberg-Balsam are near the top, 
                should there be a Discographic Parnassus. 
                Of individual historical Sonata performances, 
                Szigeti-Petri for their expressive power 
                in No.3 and Heifetz as an exemplar of 
                Darwinism in action in No.2 (to the 
                point of ruthlessness). 
              
Jonathan Woolf