Pepping's name is more 
                usually associated with sacred and organ 
                music but in fact he set great store 
                by his concert works. 
              
 
              
He was born in Duisburg 
                in Germany and studied under a pupil 
                of Schrecker, Walther Gmeindl, at the 
                Berlin Academy (1922-28). During this 
                period he wrote in an avant-garde style; 
                a regular darling of the Donaueschingen 
                Festival. 1929 saw him shift to choral 
                writing and to a tradition that links 
                with the Renaissance masters he admired 
                so much. This became his centre of gravity 
                during the 1930s. He returned to instrumental 
                music in the late 1930s. As he did so 
                he caught the ennui that surrounded 
                the musical experimentation of the 1920s. 
                All four works here return to traditional 
                models; the concerto less so. 
              
 
              
The First Symphony 
                is a cheery piece in a tradition 
                reaching back to Goldmark's Rustic 
                Wedding and in Pepping’s own times 
                recalls the Huber symphonies (recorded 
                on Sterling). Further back in time we 
                might link the mood to Beethoven's Pastoral 
                and Raff's late-period titled symphonies. 
                Only in the Molto adagio do we 
                hear intimations of a clouded sky. Here 
                a trumpet solo reflects the gloomy coin 
                represented by the anchoring sour elegy-solo 
                in Franz Schmidt's contemporary Fourth 
                Symphony. We may also hear a clod-hopping 
                Mahlerian skirl in a third movement 
                that skitters along in a Germanic echo 
                of Moeran's Sinfonietta. The 
                second movement material includes elements 
                of hymnal writing that had me thinking 
                of Nielsen's Sinfonia Espansiva. 
              
 
              
The Second Symphony 
                was written during the dark days 
                of 1942 and was premiered in Essen on 
                7 February 1943. Its long Molto sostenuto 
                first movement is at first tragic 
                and ominous with sombre fanfare-elegy-cortege 
                material from the brass. Its progress 
                is lumbering and sometimes ungainly 
                but the binding elegiac theme transcends 
                the gangly stride. It is heard discreetly 
                at 5:58. Serenity in the violins returns 
                for the Tranquillo which at times 
                again glimpses the pages of Nielsen's 
                Espansiva. The allegro spirituoso 
                recalls the heartiness of Schmidt’s 
                Hussarenlied Variations. The 
                finale is gloomily and fugally serious 
                with many an echo of Bach along the 
                way. Fascinating that the trumpet solo 
                plays such a part in these symphonies. 
                Not only in the finale of No. 2 but 
                also earlier on it is given eminence 
                with some of the gestures refractively 
                echoing the detonating fanfares of Mahler 
                5. 
              
 
              
Of these two symphonies 
                the first is the more completely resolved. 
                The second encompasses many moods. From 
                the start one expects the eternal verities, 
                tragedy and life and death. In fact 
                the symphony lacks a coherence of mood 
                while having plenty of impressive incidental 
                moments especially in that glorious 
                second movement. The First Symphony 
                sets out to illustrate and entertain 
                and does these things tolerably well; 
                certainly enough to warrant revival. 
              
 
              
Onwards to the shorter 
                second CD. 
              
 
              
The Third Symphony 
                Die Tageszeiten dates from 
                the penultimate year of the Third Reich. 
                It is of about the same length as its 
                predecessor. The standard four movements 
                are entitled: Der Morgen; Der 
                Tag; Der Abend; Die Nacht. 
                It carries little of the charnel miasma 
                of the time. If anything it represents 
                a retreat from such matters. It is a 
                symphonic companion to Pepping’s choral 
                cycle Das Jahr (1940). In uncharitable 
                hands there might be accusations of 
                Pepping kow-towing to the Aryan ideals 
                of manhood in the country's fields; 
                the stability of wife and children, 
                of sowing and harvest. Only in the finale 
                Die Nacht is there an ominous 
                edge although this dissipates in the 
                face of Pepping's trademark happy disposition 
                moderated again by the fugal character 
                and treatment of the ideas. 
              
 
              
The Third Symphony 
                was premiered in 1948 by Berlin Radio 
                with Robert Heger conducting. Pepping 
                suffered some neglect as a composer 
                who had stayed on inside Hitler's Germany 
                but there was little lasting stigma. 
                The notes say little or nothing about 
                Pepping's relationship with the Nazi 
                government. It would be interesting 
                to know although it is irrelevant to 
                appraisal of the music. 
              
 
              
The 1950 Piano Concerto 
                is short and completely successful 
                in its balance of ideas, treatment and 
                duration. Unlike the three symphonies 
                it is in only three movements. The premiere 
                was by the pianist who made a name for 
                himself by performing Furtwängler's 
                Symphonic-Concerto, Eric Then-Bergh. 
                The Berlin Phil were conducted by Joseph 
                Keilberth on 16 September 1951. It does 
                not ape the big symphonic concertos. 
                It is all so much more concise, rapid-fire 
                and even jazzy. After an exciting first 
                movement there is a deeply poignant 
                langsam with solo trumpet sounding 
                across glistening serene writing for 
                the strings. Pepping perhaps needed 
                the tension of soloist against orchestra 
                to strike alchemy. Certainly the results 
                are adroit here. The finale Maestoso 
                strikes the right note even if, 
                with the benefit of hindsight, the brass 
                fanfaring echoes the Quidditch music 
                in the Harry Potter films. Volker Banfield 
                gives this fine neglected concerto a 
                good run for its money. Well worth hearing. 
              
 
              
The annotation is full 
                and capable though it leaves historical 
                questions unanswered. The performances 
                seem completely engaged and well prepared. 
                The sound is splendid at every turn. 
              
 
              
If you have a taste 
                for German symphonies of the 1940s then 
                do give this set a hearing. The symphonies 
                have a tendency towards the discursive 
                but this is not untoward if you prefer 
                the illustrative and poetic to the grand 
                and tragic. I found the First Symphony 
                growing on me more with every hearing. 
                However each of the three has treasurable 
                moments. The Piano Concerto is an outright 
                success and deserves to be heard much 
                more widely. 
              
Rob Barnett