This recital was recorded
at the fifth Chetham’s International
Summer School and Festival for Pianists
in August 2005 It was given by serial
prize-winner, South Korean Jae-Hyuck
Cho.
The programme was something
of a heavyweight one, with the Waldstein
and Schumann’s Second sonata sharing
space with the Mephisto Waltz,
Chopin’s Fantasie-impromptu in C sharp
minor, a glimpse of his Ravel in the
shape of Jeux d’eau and
a warmly played The Lord’s Prayer
by Albert Malotte.
Cho has a warm and
an attractive touch; he’s a thoughtful
musician whose legato is immediately
appealing. Technically adroit he’s nevertheless
not watertight as some sticky moments
demonstrate. Such considerations as
finger slips in the context of a live,
presumably unedited, recital are however
relatively slight. My concern is rhythmic.
He seldom seems to set a decisive rhythmic
pulse in the Beethoven and the rhetorical
slowings are disruptive to the establishment
of a properly animated pulse. The result
is episodic phrasing with insufficient
tension. This is especially the case
in the opening movement but no less
so in the Adagio where imperfect rubati
contribute to a feeling of lassitude.
For all his care and
thoughtfulness I’m not sure if the Schumann
Op.22 sonata is quite the work to demonstrate
Cho’s best qualities. Similarly the
Liszt leaves a rather neutral impression;
it’s not sculpted with overmuch character
or warmth. His Chopin is self-consciously
artful, that push-pull rhythm that so
devitalised the Beethoven seemingly
endemic to certain aspects of his playing.
The finger slips are unimportant here,
though the singing tone is not – that
in itself would be reason enough to
lend an ear to Cho. The pity is that
it’s not yet put to the service of sympathetic
phrasing, that he feels the need to
subject his performances to such mannered
playing.
The recording is certainly
serviceable enough. There are ambient
clicks at high level – an acoustic phenomenon
or a mechanical one? – but they can’t
be heard at normal volume and won’t
disturb. It’s too early to prognosticate
about Cho’s future but this imperfect
document shows that he needs seriously
to ally his fine tonal qualities with
a more rigorous and analytical approach
to rhythm.
Jonathan Woolf
see also review
by Michael Cookson