CONTENTS 
              The romantic artist Katharine Ellis; 2. 
              Inventing Liszt’s life: early biography 
              and autobiography Alexander Rehding; 3. 
              Liszt in the twentieth century James Deaville; 
              4. Liszt's early and Weimar piano works 
              Kenneth Hamilton; 5. Liszt's late piano 
              works: a survey James M. Baker; 6. Liszt's 
              late piano works: larger forms James M. 
              Baker; 7. Liszt's piano concerti: a lost 
              tradition Anna Celenza; 8. Performing 
              Liszt’s piano music Kenneth Hamilton; 
              9. Liszt's Lieder Monika Hennemann; 10. 
              Liszt's symphonic poems and symphonies 
              Reeves Shulstad; 11. Liszt's sacred choral 
              music Dolores Pesce. 
              There has been a received 
                wisdom about Liszt, dating from biographical 
                material published during his lifetime, 
                that he was, as man, performer and artist, 
                a bundle of contradictions. In turn, 
                it has been assumed that to understand 
                Liszt in any of these roles it is important 
                to come to grips with the nature of 
                those contradictions. The result is 
                that separating life from art is perhaps 
                more difficult with Liszt than with 
                any other major composer. 
              
 
              
The distinguished Cambridge 
                Companions series about composers has 
                always sought to bring about such a 
                separation by focusing primarily on 
                the music. Straight biographical content 
                is left out in favour of particular 
                aspects of life and reputation. And 
                so it is with this new publication. 
                There are eight chapters on the music 
                and three on life-related issues. Nevertheless, 
                the same old theme persists in that 
                there is a strong implication in the 
                book that the music cannot be fully 
                understood without understanding the 
                paradox of the man’s personality. For 
                example, in the first chapter, Katherine 
                Ellis puts the contradictions thus: 
               
              
 
              
The man who seriously 
                studied Beethoven’s sonatas was also 
                a competitive showman who would not 
                be out-done by rival virtuosi; a man 
                who prized religious devotion at the 
                same time as engaging in a spectacular 
                adulterous relationship; an avowed Hungarian 
                nationalist who was in fact a non Hungarian-speaking 
                cosmopolitan. 
               
              
 
              
The first three chapters 
                come at the theme from different angles. 
                A second theme is also hammered home: 
                the fact that only a relatively small 
                number of Liszt’s compositions were 
                published after his death, and in modern 
                times, little of it recorded. Even professed 
                Liszt lovers may be ignorant of a large 
                body of his work. This is beginning 
                to change and tribute is paid, for example, 
                to the pianist Leslie Howard who, after 
                many years, has finished recording the 
                whole of the piano music. The book is 
                timely in that it is produced in the 
                light of a number of such positive developments. 
              
 
              
The editor, Kenneth 
                Hamilton of Birmingham University (UK), 
                has impeccable credentials for he is 
                a distinguished pianist, academic and 
                Liszt specialist. One of his jobs, one 
                assumes, would be to give guidelines 
                to his writers – all but one of whom 
                are North American based - about where 
                to pitch their contributions. This is 
                a difficult issue. I have always assumed 
                the Cambridge series to be aiming at 
                what might be described as the knowledgeable 
                music-lover and the music student. Even 
                that can be difficult to achieve because 
                the "knowledgeable music-lover" 
                is not necessarily someone who reads 
                music, let alone knows their supertonic 
                from a sub-mediant. How technical do 
                you get? To my astonishment, Hamilton 
                says in his editor’s preface that giving 
                some guide to the contributors about 
                who to aim at is not his job: "I 
                see it as no part of an editor’s duty". 
                So the fact that half the eight chapters 
                on the music require some technical 
                knowledge to get the best out of them 
                and the other half do not is clearly 
                an accident. 
              
 
              
There are some perverse 
                outcomes from this approach. For example, 
                if you want to dip in and read up only 
                on Liszt’s piano compositions, you would 
                have to read three chapters (4-6). The 
                first of these is by Hamilton himself 
                and covers earlier works. Later works 
                are then covered by James M. Baker in 
                the next two chapters. Hamilton writes 
                for the lay music-lover and does not 
                even offer a single musical example 
                whereas Baker goes to the other extreme. 
                He expects you not only to read music, 
                not only be able to cope with harmonic 
                analysis and key relationships but even 
                to have the scores at hand of the works 
                he discusses because he refers you to 
                bar numbers. Here is a random taste 
                of Baker: 
              
 
               
              
The dominant harmony 
                is never stated outright , but rather 
                is represented by the diminished-seventh 
                chord on G sharp (bars 10 and 12), two 
                elements of which are displaced by pungent 
                appoggiaturas in cross-relation: C sharp 
                resolving to D against C natural resolving 
                to B. (the lone appoggiatura in bar 
                3 of the earlier version is ordinary 
                by comparison.) 
              
 
               
              
Now if you are a reader 
                who wants that kind of technical description, 
                fine, but you may be frustrated by the 
                fact that you will not get the great 
                B minor Piano Sonata given the 
                same treatment because it comes in Hamilton’s 
                chapter and he is not aiming at you. 
                (If Hamilton were challenged on this 
                he might direct you to his book, published 
                by Cambridge UP nine years ago, that 
                is entirely devoted to the one work). 
              
 
              
I am not saying that 
                the approach is wrong, just pointing 
                to inconsistencies that a prospective 
                buyer of the book needs to know. By 
                the way, the Cambridge UP publicity 
                on the book – and you can see this on 
                their website – describes it as, "An 
                up-to-date view of Liszt for the non-specialist", 
                and on the back of the book you read 
                that it is "available for general 
                readership". You can make your 
                own mind up about that. 
              
 
              
Having got that out 
                of the way, I think that taken as a 
                whole, for someone with technical knowledge, 
                this book provides as comprehensive 
                an insight into Liszt’s work as any 
                that is available and, compared with 
                Alan Walker’s majestic three-volume 
                work on Liszt, admirably concise. For 
                the layperson, nearly 70% of the book 
                will be comprehensible, challenging 
                and illuminating. And for pianists aspiring 
                to play Liszt, there is some really 
                fascinating and insightful material 
                by Hamilton on interpretative matters 
                and on piano style and technique of 
                Liszt’s period. 
              
 
              
The book is highly 
                authoritative, bang up to date with 
                the latest Liszt scholarship, and there 
                are lists, tables, notes and indices 
                that provide excellent reference material, 
                all nicely presented. 
              
John Leeman