This is a real eye-opener. 
                To eavesdrop on Karajan at work reveals 
                a true master-musician. Karajan knows 
                exactly what he wants, and how to communicate 
                it to the orchestra. Often, too, he 
                will tell the orchestra why he wants 
                something done in a particular way; 
                in the introduction to the first movement 
                of the Schumann, he tells the violins 
                exactly how to take away the harmonics 
                as they play so that the doubling flute 
                can come through. Note that the Schumann 
                is the only extant document of Karajan 
                rehearsing an entire work. 
              
 
              
The Schumann, in fact, 
                was the last rehearsal before the DGG 
                Vienna Symphony recording, yet Karajan 
                remains fastidious – no run-through 
                here. He will take strings at a fraction 
                of full speed to ensure unanimity. His 
                imagery is accurate – the last bars 
                before the first movement proper ‘hold 
                the idea of the whole symphony’. They 
                are taking an idea ‘to the point of 
                madness’ - surely a reference to the 
                composer’s malady? Illuminating comments 
                come thick and fast – the writing, Karajan 
                posits, comes from a keyboard background 
                idea and the players must take that 
                into account in their bowings. 
              
 
              
He refers to the Richard 
                Strauss and Weingartner re-orchestrations 
                to bring out what was important ‘to 
                the Romantic era’. He, however, tries 
                to remain true to the romantic impulse 
                by staying faithful to the score. It 
                is telling that he says about two specific 
                bars of the first movement ‘too much 
                rhythm and too little expression’, a 
                clue perhaps to the genesis of the later 
                Karajan splodge? Yet there is so much 
                here: his thoughts on ostinato - always 
                equally accented notes - and his clear 
                grasp of Schumann’s tricky structural 
                thought. He brings a quasi-Wagnerian 
                breadth to the transition to the finale 
                before castigating his players for playing 
                the last movement in too frivolous a 
                fashion - ‘For Heaven’s sake this is 
                not a jolly piece!’ 
              
 
              
It is the long-range 
                vision that is the most striking aspect 
                of the film. Again in black-and-white, 
                although shot slightly darker than the 
                rehearsal, Karajan, himself clad all 
                in black, gives the first movement introduction 
                a darkly magisterial slant. The Allegro, 
                when it comes, is rightly determined. 
                The sound congests a little too much 
                at forte, though. Karajan, conducting 
                from memory, uses his hands, arms and 
                body to sculpt a performance that is 
                quite simply electric. The filming is 
                imaginatively unpredictable – aerial 
                shots and spotlights on soloists are 
                juxtaposed – then suddenly the camera 
                freezes, as if mesmerized, on Karajan 
                for a period. 
              
 
              
The filming of the 
                solo oboe and solo cello at the opening 
                of the slow movement is particularly 
                memorable. They appear as isolated figures, 
                juxtaposed against each other against 
                a backcloth of darkness. There is a 
                real fire to the finale. The close-up 
                filming of the fugato gives it an added 
                edge of intensity; as if Karajan would 
                let up anyway! As it reaches its climax, 
                a shot of Karajan shows the Maestro 
                in typical, concentration-drenched pose. 
              
 
              
‘The Art of the Conductor’ 
                is the title of the second (shorter) 
                film on Beethoven’s Fifth with the Berliner 
                Philharmoniker. There is an added and 
                unannounced bonus – a 1966 Unitel interview 
                with Karajan, who is seated at a piano; 
                it is not separately indexed. He refers 
                to a series of thirteen broadcasts preceded 
                by an introduction: rehearsal or even 
                conducting masterclass. Taking as his 
                example the opening of the second movement 
                of Beethoven Fifth, he then stands and 
                watches an unidentified student conductor 
                and tells him to be a sculptor with 
                sound as he rehearses the cellos and 
                violas. Karajan even demonstrates the 
                art of connection between notes at the 
                piano - in itself a seemingly contradictory 
                idea! - and even introduces some motivic 
                analysis. 
              
 
              
Then to the Beethoven/Karajan 
                film of the performance. There is a 
                mighty intensity to the playing we hear 
                - as well as some of the Karajan bass-heaviness. 
                Some of the filming is superb – the 
                way the camera focuses on the solo oboe 
                cadenza and then juxtaposes Karajan; 
                the characteristic view of Karajan with 
                closed eyes, but seen through a forest 
                of violin bows ... this is not only 
                dramatic but carefully considered. And 
                all this while the music positively 
                blazes; this even displaces my preferred 
                Karajan reading, the early Philharmonia. 
                And if Karajan does slow up for the 
                big orchestral restatement of the ‘Fate’ 
                theme, it is not a huge halting. 
              
 
              
The slow movement is 
                affectionately shaped on every level 
                although some will doubtless find it 
                too personally shaped. The depth 
                of the string sound is a particular 
                joy here. This movement emerges as a 
                personal and deeply felt utterance. 
                Its shadow is felt over the Scherzo; 
                the camera’s dwelling on the double-basses 
                that form the bedrock of the sound is 
                hardly accidental. The finale is absolutely 
                monumental – it reminds us that clichés 
                like ‘hewn in granite’ have a starting 
                point somewhere, and that starting point 
                is from performances like this. The 
                camera zooms into Karajan’s upper torso 
                for the final couple of chords. It is, 
                after all, his performance!. 
              
 
              
Informed notes by the 
                Karajan authority Richard Osborne complete 
                a significant release. 
              
 
              
Colin Clarke