Having
                    raved about the San Francisco Tilson Thomas recording of
                    Mahler’s 7th Symphony, I was delighted to have
                    the opportunity to sample the great 5th Symphony,
                    packaged like the others in this series with a nice box and
                    booklet, and with sumptuous SACD hybrid sound. Once again
                    I have the luxury of a big thick 1904 edition Peters Edition
                    score, bought for virtually no money in an unwieldy heap
                    with all the other Mahler Symphonies from a Dutch charity
                    shop ignorant of their true value. My other reference is
                    Leonard Bernstein’s 1988 DG recording, chosen as ‘Building
                    a Library’ recommendation some years ago by David Mellor.
                    While Mr. Mellor’s opinion may not be my reference on most
                    things, at least the 1999 ‘Rough Guide’ to Classical Music
                    is in agreement, with Lenny’s DG Mahler 5 in there with their
                    top 100 ‘Essential CDs’.
                
                 
                
                
                So,
                    leaving this image of your friendly reviewer deep into his
                    element, does Tilson Thomas topple Bernstein’s legendary
                    Vienna Philharmonic recording? Certainly, much of what I
                    admired in the 7th Symphony recording is present
                    in this new 5th. The detail is quite remarkable.
                    Following the score you can sense the accuracy in terms of
                    balance and colour, with all boxes ticked in terms of satisfaction
                    with regard to sound quality. By comparison, Bernstein’s
                    orchestra can sound quite blowsy at times, the pre-fire Alte
                    Oper in Frankfurt no doubt contributing to a considerably
                    vast and resonant sound platform.
                
                 
                
                The
                    opening pages of the symphony are something of a microcosm
                    when comparing the two recordings at hand. Why is it that
                    Bernstein seems to be able to create more drama and more
                    impact – why is it his recording rather than Tilson Thomas’s
                    you want to hear right to the end? Small points add up to
                    substantially different results. Bernstein (arguably) seems
                    to have the better solo trumpet in general, but it’s the
                    attention to dynamics which make the difference – subtle
                    inflections which transform the opening curtain-call. The
                    solo builds from a low D# to one an octave higher in the
                    first seven bars – the high note having a small diminuendo
                    which the San Francisco player ignores. Just before the tutti
                    chord which crashes in at the end of the solo, Bernstein
                    uses the diminuendo from sf to reach  p which
                    is intended for the entry of the second trumpet, going up
                    to ff in half a bar, for the solo trumpet as well.
                    This is a bit naughty, but boy does that extreme crescendo
                    make the ‘hit’ of that first chord something stunning. Again,
                    at this point the San Francisco trumpet seems to ignore that
                    last diminuendo before the opening tutti, which is a shame – if
                    you want real crescendo you have to start quietly. Reaching
                    down into the Pesante depths before the first ‘tune’ at
                    figure 2, Bernstein is somehow rougher and more forceful
                    with those hammer blow triplets: Tilson Thomas gets there
                    as well, but the impact is less – subtly so, and only in
                    evidence when you make direct comparisons like these, but
                    to me they sum up my reasons for preferring one over the
                    other. With Tilson Thomas, the transition between the end
                    of that descending scale and that violin/cello theme at 2
                    sounds just that, a transition. Bernstein is already giving
                    us the chills, emphasising the funeral-march nature of those
                    eight bars.            
                
                 
                
                I
                    could go on like this for hours, but I should imagine you
                    are getting the point by now. Moving along to the second
                    movement there is another case in point. After rehearsal
                    mark 11 there is a bare section with only celli and a timp
                    pedal roll. This cello section solo at the change of key
                    between rehearsal marks 11 and 12 is marked PP klagend.
                    Tilson Thomas gets the PP, but Bernstein shows the
                    way to wring a klagend character from this relatively
                    simple line – allowing the celli some portamenti between
                    the seventh interval leaps, and emphasising them with extra
                    stresses – admittedly not in the score, but surely providing
                    Mahler with more of what he seems to have wanted.
                
                 
                
                The
                    opening of the Scherzo has Tilson Thomas coming out
                    on top for once. Bernstein takes Mahler’s ‘nicht zu schnell’ marking
                    just a little too seriously, and it is with the San Francisco
                    orchestra that we get more of the Ländler schwung that
                    this music seems to demand. I would at this point like to
                    make clear that this new recording and performance is in
                    no way a bad one – very, very far from it. The orchestral
                    playing is of the highest quality, and with demonstration
                    sound collectors of this edition need have no qualms about
                    adding this disc to their collection. Bernstein is in some
                    ways a unique case, but another of my reasons for selecting
                    his version as a comparison is that both make claims as being ‘live’ recordings.
                    I have no way of proving otherwise, any more than I could
                    disprove a spiritualist orchestra’s claim to have made their
                    recording ‘in the presence of the composer’, but be sure
                    of one thing, both ‘live’ recordings have had any offensive
                    bumps or squeaks airbrushed into oblivion. There is a little
                    moment in the new recording which proved this to me. In the
                    first movement at 7:27-8 there is a digital ‘splice’, a small
                    bump in the decay at the final chord before Tempo 1 which
                    even Mr. Doppler would never be able to explain away as anything
                    other than a big fat edit. The San Francisco make no claims
                    otherwise, but like the DG Bernstein set, you never get to
                    hear how much of the work was done the day after the concert,
                    with invited bodies to sit in the audience so that the acoustic
                    is comparable with concert conditions (I know, I was that
                    soldier). There is another mildly disturbing blip at 5:03
                    into the final movement, as if someone might have spluttered
                    sugary coffee onto the tape at some stage, but for a live
                    recording the present disc is otherwise as clean as the proverbial
                    whistle, with no applause at the end – just some ghostly
                    whispers in the decay of the final chord.
                
                 
                
                The
                    only remaining million-dollar question is; will Tilson Thomas
                    bring us to an other-worldly nirvana with the famous Adagietto fourth
                    movement? The secret here lies in the strings of course,
                    and the San Francisco ‘sound’ is relatively cool in comparison
                    to Bernstein’s vibrato-laden Vienna violins. The DG recording
                    highlights the harp just a little too much for my ears, so
                    it comes back to a question of taste. Bernstein loads the
                    lines with more emotional charge; Tilson Thomas gives us
                    a more ethereal transport to those heavenly heights.
                
                 
                
                This
                    new Mahler 5 is a truly excellent performance, and a stunning
                    recording. If it is Bernstein which keeps me sitting until
                    my bladder is fit to burst rather than wandering off to make
                    a coffee, then that might just be my problem, and I really
                    don’t want to put you off with such unsavoury details. I
                    would most certainly recommend this recording for study purposes
                    for the detail alone, and for SACD sound these San Francisco
                    issues are hard to beat for sheer orchestral glory. The benefits
                    are all there in the clarity and quality of the production,
                    my only real caveat is in the character of the performance – something
                    about which I would expect listeners to be able to make their
                    own minds.
                
                 
                
                    Dominy Clements
                
                    
                    see also review by Tony Duggan