Charles Ives’ two string quartets represent 
                  two sides of a musical coin. The first, “From the Salvation 
                  Army”, composed in 1896, while he was a sophomore at Yale, seems 
                  almost demure compared to much of Ives’ other music. Like his 
                  first symphony, which he later shrugged off as a work of youth, 
                  it is relatively accessible, featuring little dissonance, yet 
                  including quotes on a number of well-known hymns, something 
                  Ives would continue to do all his life; as well as the familiar 
                  opening motive from Beethoven’s Fifth Symphony which Ives often 
                  used in his work. While the development and exposition of themes 
                  are not revolutionary, the music manages to remain just on the 
                  fence between romanticism and modernity. 
                The second quartet is another kettle of 
                  fish altogether. In three movements, “Discussions”, “Arguments”, 
                  and “The Call of the Mountain”, it opens with an eerie chromatic 
                  phrase that develops into a hymn-like motif, before decaying 
                  again into chromaticism. Here is Ives’ true musical form: challenging 
                  the listener at every step, provoking and surprising. While 
                  the first movement is somewhat sedate, the second music is harsh 
                  and dissonant, and merits the name “Arguments”. This relatively 
                  brief movement - less than 5 minutes compared to the framing 
                  movements’ duration of over ten minutes each - is concentrated 
                  and powerful, and the third movement returns to the tone of 
                  the first, with “a tranquility that suggests the arguing foursome 
                  have forgotten their differences as they contemplate the eternal 
                  from a spot in the mountains.” (From the liner notes by Jim 
                  Lovensheimer.) This reminds me of John Cage’s anecdote about 
                  something D. T. Suzuki said about studying Zen. "Before 
                  studying Zen, men are men and mountains are mountains. While 
                  studying Zen, things become confused. After studying Zen, men 
                  are men and mountains are mountains." Dr. Suzuki was asked 
                  what the difference is between before and after. "No difference,” 
                  he replied, “only the feet are a little bit off the ground.”
                Finally, this disc contains a brief scherzo 
                  for string quartet composed around 1907-1914. This raucous work 
                  features many quotes from musics of all kinds, and is typical 
                  of Ives’ music of this period, collaging hymns such as Bringing 
                  In the Sheaves, Stephen Foster songs and other popular music. 
                The performers attack this music with zeal 
                  and energy, and with exemplary balance between their instruments. 
                  However, the recording sounds odd, at once distant and reverberated, 
                  with not quite enough separation among the various instruments. 
                  The combination of the good balance and the lackluster sound 
                  gives the impression of a single group rather than the interplay 
                  of four instruments. Comparing this recording with that by the 
                  Emerson Quartet shows that the latter group has the upper hand 
                  by a landslide: not only is their performance tighter, but the 
                  sound is nearly ideal. On the Emerson recording, each instrument 
                  stands out, the stereo separation is perfect and the overall 
                  sound excellent. The Emerson’s performance, too, is a step up 
                  from that of the Blairs, though the vibrato used by the Emerson’s 
                  violinist detracts a bit from the intensity of the final movement 
                  of the Second Quartet. However, I find that the sound of the 
                  Emerson recording helps give the music a little more drama — 
                  especially, again, in the second quartet and the brilliant final 
                  section of the third movement.
                Nonetheless, in spite of the sound, this 
                  is a fine recording, and its budget price means that it is an 
                  excellent introduction to Ives for those unfamiliar with his 
                  work. Ives fans will certainly want to snatch this up for another 
                  reading of these works that are not recorded often enough. 
                Kirk McElhearn  
                
              see also Review 
                by Dominy Clements