As Farhan Malik in 
                his booklet notes points out, Gieseking 
                was one of the first pianists to record 
                Beethoven’s First Concerto, predated 
                only by Kempff (1925) and Schnabel (1932). 
                Gieseking’s first essay dated from April 
                1937 and was with the Berlin State Opera 
                House Orchestra under Hans Rosbaud. 
                The present Music & Arts release 
                features his second traversal of the 
                First Concerto 
              
 
              
Listeners may be taken 
                aback by the level of the opening. Kubelík 
                extracts a true pianissimo from his 
                orchestra, which proceeds to give a 
                dynamic account of the orchestral exposition; 
                lithe yet full of Beethovenian intent. 
                Contrasts are well-drawn, the lyrical 
                theme nevertheless retaining its rhythmic 
                impetus. 
              
 
              
Gieseking, though, 
                is the real surprise. Known more for 
                his Debussy and Ravel, his Beethoven 
                reveals a pianist of immense finger-strength 
                which is needed in spades in this piece. 
                He shows full awareness aware of the 
                subtleties of Beethoven’s voicing. The 
                interaction between piano and orchestra 
                is expertly judged. There is a real 
                chamber-music quality to many of the 
                exchanges. Gieseking plays the second, 
                and shortest, of the composer’s own 
                cadenzas for the first movement with 
                the lightest of touches, a fair amount 
                of wit, some Sturm und Drang, 
                and with complete mastery. 
              
 
              
If the Largo may be 
                felt to be on the brisk side, Gieseking 
                brings to it a superb sense of cantabile; 
                his clarinet accomplice in this movement 
                tries, and nearly succeeds in, matching 
                Gieseking’s subtlety. The finale is 
                gentle and sedate. There are many more 
                dynamic than this. Kubelík, indeed, 
                seems intent on injecting some drama 
                around the 6’50-7’00 mark, pointedly 
                underlining the timpani roll. A thought-provoking 
                reading with many moments of inspiration. 
              
 
              
The ‘Emperor’ is, according 
                to Music & Arts, the only complete 
                recording of a classical work in stereo 
                surviving from World War II. This performance 
                has previously been available on Music 
                & Arts 637 and 815. Previous to 
                the present recording, Gieseking recorded 
                the work in 1934 with the VPO under 
                Bruno Walter, a version only predated 
                by Lamond in 1922, Backhaus in 1927 
                and Schnabel in 1932. Later, Gieseking 
                was to record the ‘Emperor’ with Karajan 
                (1951) and Galliera (1955). There remains 
                a live New York account with Cantelli 
                at the helm from 1956. 
              
 
              
The orchestra at the 
                outset reveals some distortion/edge 
                to the sound, yet within itself it is 
                resplendent. Gieseking’s initial flourishes 
                are superb, leading to an interpretation 
                that is supremely thought-through. He 
                refuses the temptation to slow down 
                around 5’49 (so many pianists do!), 
                preferring to let his long-range thought 
                carry him through. And it works. By 
                the end, one is aware of having been 
                on a long journey, a journey that requires 
                and gets the calm stasis of the sow 
                movement. Gieseking at times lets notes 
                drop like pearls, and throughout plays 
                with the utmost innigkeit. 
              
 
              
All the more of a shame 
                that the finale is on the dour side. 
                It strikes me that it is deliberately 
                undynamic, but it also strikes me that 
                this is contra the music’s inner nature. 
                Never exultant, this finale leaves an 
                impression one would never have guessed 
                from the first two movements. 
              
 
              
Nevertheless the disc 
                demands a hearing, and there is much 
                to fascinate. 
              
Colin Clarke