When a new CD plops 
                onto the doormat and I discover it to 
                be of music by a composer completely 
                new to me all I can hope for initially 
                is that the music will make some sense 
                and that I might like what I hear. Only 
                occasionally am I completely bowled 
                over from bar one. But with Ulrich Leyendecker 
                that is exactly what has happened. Immediately 
                the 3rd Symphony began I 
                felt an affinity with the sheer sound 
                the composer conjured from the orchestra 
                and as I learned more I also felt an 
                affinity with the form, structure and 
                aims. Unusual and rather special. Let 
                me share it further. 
              
 
              
This Symphony, recorded 
                the day after its first performance, 
                opens with a widely spaced chord especially 
                in the strings. This sets up one particular 
                texture that conveys a great sense of 
                open spaces and a huge natural landscape. 
                The violin glissandi using quarter-tones 
                almost transport you into outer space, 
                anyway you are certainly not earthbound. 
                The opening Largo continues to be literally 
                ‘out of this world’ and is mostly atonal 
                but approachable. The CD insert claims 
                that the composer is interested in ‘sonic 
                architecture’ yet ‘manages to communicate 
                directly with its audience’. I would 
                take issue with one aspect of Cris Posslac’s 
                otherwise excellent and detailed booklet 
                notes. They tell us that Leyendecker 
                has rejected the avant-garde in favor 
                of "finding a new certainty from 
                the spirit perceived in past traditions". 
                Quite right too BUT we must not deny 
                that this music, especially the concerto, 
                is not easy listening. This music is 
                large-scale, atonal and demanding in 
                its need for the listener to follow 
                the argument. It is also colourful and, 
                especially important, its form and sense 
                of direction of the music are clear. 
                This is where the composer’s excellent 
                programme notes which are quoted in 
                the booklet are very handy. Anyone can 
                understand what his aims are and how 
                he has set about putting the works together. 
                Just a sentence like "The second 
                movement (of the 3rd Symphony) 
                has quickly scurrying figures from the 
                various levels of sound. To these are 
                added rhythmically and especially sharply-pointed 
                shapes that displace the arrangement 
                of notes from the start in a constant 
                dynamic movement," is helpful. 
                When you hear the music it all fits 
                into place. 
              
 
              
Of the Concerto the 
                composer tells us "Constant changes 
                in the relationship between solo and 
                orchestra and increasingly disparate 
                instrumentation determine still more 
                strongly the working out in the middle 
                section of the first movement". 
                We should not deny that this work is 
                powerful and gripping. It demands your 
                attention and will occasionally bowl 
                you over. You embark on a varied and 
                exciting musical journey once it starts. 
                First there is a scurrying idea which 
                made me immediately think of a Hardanger 
                fiddler. Added to it are tiny points 
                of colour which increase until suddenly 
                at 1’22" the pulse slackens to 
                expose a fragile but still pointillist 
                world. This also grows in intensity, 
                meanwhile the violinist’s virtuosity 
                increases. After a further minute even 
                this idea is halted as the soloist weaves 
                a melancholy line over curious forest 
                noises. And so it goes on fascinating 
                the ear, new tempi, new textures, but 
                all related. This section too builds 
                to a frantic and totally dissonant climax. 
              
 
              
And incidentally, just 
                to surprise you, the third movement 
                is a set of nine variations on a song 
                which the composer had written a few 
                years ago as part of his ‘Hebrew Ballads’. 
              
 
              
Sometimes these pieces 
                reminded me of James Dillon; sometimes 
                of Hans Werner Henze. But these analogies 
                are stupid because frankly this music 
                is pan-European and yet totally individual. 
              
 
              
I find it curious that 
                Naxos have taken such a long time to 
                issue this disc, and as it lasts for 
                less than an hour I wondered if the 
                intention was to put another work onto 
                it. As this hasn’t come to fruition 
                perhaps they can be persuaded to allow 
                us to hear more of Leyendecker’s work 
                in the future. 
              
 
              
The CD has excellent 
                notes on the music, the performers and 
                on the composer. Although I have not 
                dwelt on his biography I hope dear reader 
                that you will not mind. I feel that 
                first one should take in the music and 
                then discover that he was a pupil of 
                Inigo Schmitt from 1962-5 (who he? 
                I hear you say). Later in the 1970s 
                he studied with Rudlof Petzold - any 
                the wiser? Probably not. Well, look 
                him up on the internet ... there is 
                a good website. More importantly listen 
                to this disc. I hope that it fascinates 
                you as much as it has me. 
              
 
               
              
Gary Higginson 
              
Biography 
                on Sikorski.de