As 
                  a reviewer, and as a musician I have to be open-minded and attempt 
                  to be sympathetic to all music. Normally my way of solving this 
                  is that when a new release plops through the letter box the 
                  first thing I do is to play a track or two and then read the 
                  booklet notes. However with this disc I read the opening of 
                  the notes by Steven Ledbetter first. I’m afraid was immediately 
                  discouraged. “During the two decades following the end of the 
                  second world war, American composers discovered and embraced 
                  Schoenberg’s twelve-tone techniques ...”. Then follows a description 
                  of how listeners, from that point, lost contact with composers. 
                  Now I don’t deny that this happened “much new music” he goes 
                  on, “was composed for increasingly small audiences of academic 
                  specialists”. A picture is painted for us of how the history 
                  of music has been saved  by the employment of “tonal elements 
                  through the quotation of older compositions”.   A little further 
                  on we are given a substantial quote from Robert Beaser on how 
                  he suddenly had a Damascus Road conversion “sitting under a 
                  fig tree” (would you believe it) in which he realized that he 
                  had to find a “middle road”.
                Well 
                  I’m sorry but all this immediately put me right off. Am I a 
                  cynic or is this ‘populist-speak’ for: I couldn’t get an audience 
                  for my early experimental music so I decided to write music 
                  with old fashioned tunes and harmony? So I listened and tried 
                  to forget what I had read.
                My 
                  first thought was ‘what a superb orchestrater’. His virtuosity 
                  is quite breath-taking. Then I realized that I couldn’t find 
                  much else. I heard the opening work, the Chorale Variations, 
                  twice on consecutive evenings. A few hours later I could not 
                  remember anything about it except its form: ending with the 
                  Chorale, its brashness and a certain emphasis on energy and 
                  rhythm. Indeed various other composers passed across the horizon: 
                  Leonard Bernstein, a touch of Copland and even Gershwin, a composer 
                  strongly evoked in the Piano Concerto. Try as I might I could 
                  only find surface excitement and an interest which soon evaporated.
                Frustrated 
                  with myself I moved to the large-scale Piano Concerto. This 
                  is a three-movement piece with a set of variations as a slow 
                  movement,. It started promisingly with a slow introduction to 
                  a large-scale first movement. Before long it was ‘in yer face’ 
                  as the variations develop and it continues in much the same 
                  vein. I most enjoyed the middle movement with its opening contrasts 
                  of a string chorale followed by writing for glockenspiels. The 
                  piano’s first and subsequent entries were almost Brahmsian yet 
                  the spirit of Samuel Barber hovers over the composer’s shoulder 
                  and a powerful climax, which seems oddly out of place is achieved. 
                  Pamela Mia Paul is in total command of the often demanding solo 
                  part and the balance between her and orchestra is ideal.
                The 
                  Seven Deadly Sins is a setting of a fascinating poem by Anthony 
                  Hecht. This was discovered by the composer after Hecht won the 
                  Pulitzer Prize for poetry with a collection ‘The Hard Hours’. 
                  Aphoristic lines offer the composer many opportunities for colour 
                  and expression. I was first disappointed that with each ‘sin’ 
                  being short Beaser didn’t somehow connect or draw the sections 
                  together either physically or musically. Secondly I was disappointed 
                  that the song-cycle as I thought it would be, was no more than 
                  an orchestral work with text - the vocal writing being unmemorable 
                  and mostly unlyrical and not adhering to any deeper meaning 
                  of the words. The music is lacking in strong characterization 
                  between ‘sins’. Wrath, Sloth, Avarice etc were not as musically 
                  differentiated as one might have expected or wanted. The orchestral 
                  writing again however is mostly quite brilliant.
                So 
                  there it is. I realize that there is a strong market for music 
                  like this and quite often with composers like Richard Danielpour 
                  or Corigliano I am a part of it, but I have to confess to my 
                  failure with Robert Beaser.
                I 
                  make no adverse criticism of any of the performances. They seem 
                  immaculate and superbly well prepared. Jan Opalach has a fine 
                  resonant bass-baritone and clear diction and sings the cycle 
                  with passion and understanding. The recording is resonant but 
                  detailed and allows the music to speak naturally and with a 
                  full bloom.
                Steven 
                  Ledbetter’s notes on the music are useful as is the biography 
                  and photograph. There are also notes on the orchestra and performers. 
                  
                Gary 
                  Higginson