Schnabel’s wartime 
                American Beethoven recordings in this 
                RCA twofer have always been less often 
                reissued than his more famous pre-War 
                sets. That they have generally been 
                less well appreciated is, I think, also 
                true. But they are handily compiled 
                here and make strong claims on the Schnabel 
                admirer, even one who has that earlier 
                complete sonata cycle or the Sargent-led 
                Concerto recordings. In Op.109 we can 
                hear again the remarkable sense of space 
                and span in his playing and, for all 
                that he was chided as professorial, 
                the naturally unforced eloquence of 
                the last movement. As with Op.111 – 
                where the first movement is more measured 
                and the passagework tends to be more 
                considered – these remakes are less 
                volatile and full of momentum than the 
                earlier discs. The Arietta theme of 
                Op.111 is a case in point but throughout 
                both these sonata performances one feels 
                slightly less of a sense of pressing 
                Schnabelian-Beethovenian rhetoric than 
                his earlier self. Though I should add 
                that they still occupy an important 
                place in the discography, still profoundly 
                indicative of Schnabel’s eminence in 
                the repertoire. 
              
 
              
The Concertos, in a 
                sense, share the same trajectory as 
                the sonatas. Stock was a fine, much-underrated 
                conductor (as a Biddulph release graphically 
                illustrates) and no time beater, as 
                he was often caricatured. Nevertheless 
                some of the transitional moments in 
                the Fourth sound a mite forced and some 
                of the orchestral sonorities are a bit 
                fatly saturated (in the first movement) 
                or not clearly defined (in the finale). 
                Schnabel sustains musical concentration 
                throughout and is energised and strong 
                boned in the finale (and hear him keep 
                the pedal down at the end). I like the 
                Emperor even more – from the pompous 
                horns, all puffed up and preening, through 
                the rapt direction of the slow movement 
                (even when you feel it could be quicker 
                you realise the rightness of Schnabel’s 
                tempo in absolute terms) and then to 
                the finale – full of caprice and fun. 
              
 
              
But I’m afraid I didn’t 
                get on with the transfers. In the concertos 
                surface noise comes and goes – it’s 
                always better to have a uniform level 
                of 78 crackle than to have it intrude 
                and recede – and there are pre-echoes 
                in the sonatas (badly in the opening 
                movement of Op.111) and scrunches on 
                fortes. I could add that the sonatas 
                sound as if they need a treble boost 
                as well. So an important set then – 
                compromised by indifferent transfers. 
              
 
              
Jonathan Woolf