With this disc Supraphon 
                launch a spanking 
                new series of the Martinů symphonies 
                to compete with Neumann (ADD, Supraphon, 
                excellent but somewhat dated analogue), 
                Flor (BMG-RCA, deleted but surely worth 
                a box reissue), Fagen (Naxos, under-powered), 
                Järvi (Bis, outstanding) and Thomson 
                (Chandos - reputedly good). 
              
 
              
The 
                six symphonies are pretty tightly grouped, 
                chronologically speaking, (apart from 
                the sixth). They form the core of Martinů's 
                penultimate period (1940-45). All were 
                written in the USA in refuge from an 
                otherwise murderous fate in Europe. 
                They carry a sharper cargo of nostalgia 
                because they were written in exile and 
                the Third is strong in this respect. 
                Its currency is a warm blend of homesickness 
                and foreboding. 
              
 
              
The recording throughout 
                is of startling subtlety and this can 
                be heard to grand but least spectacular 
                effect at the end of the Third Symphony. 
                The admirable spatial image can be heard 
                in the first three minutes of the second 
                movement. Supraphon have captured a 
                surprisingly refined yet vivacious image. 
                Listen to the little orchestral shudders 
                at 1.01 on the right hand channel in 
                the first movement. In the third movement 
                this version comes into its own in honeyed 
                yet uncloying radiance. There is even 
                a bardic piano at 4.03 in the second 
                movement; it is, for all the world, 
                like an interjection from Bax's Symphonic 
                Variations. The slow movement has 
                a time-stilling quality - almost Delian 
                almost Sibelian. The mind’s eye conjures 
                brooks and tributaries, spring bubbling 
                and rivulets coursing. 
              
 
              
Bĕlohlávek 
                has recorded the Fourth Symphony twice 
                before. The first version came out on 
                a modestly priced Panton disc (1205 
                2011). There he conducted Prague Symphony 
                Orchestra in a recording made in the 
                House of Artists in Prague on 24 and 
                25 June 1979. The coupling was the Fifth 
                Symphony conducted by Otakar Trhlik. 
                I strongly suspect that both were Czech 
                radio tapes licensed for commercial 
                issue and issued AAD. They are fine 
                readings though the comparatively opaque 
                quality might bother the more fastidious. 
              
 
              
His exuberant second 
                effort is likely to have made its way 
                into many collections. This is the Chandos 
                recording on CHAN 9138 made on 18 and 
                19 September 1992. As with the present 
                Supraphon disc the orchestra there was 
                the redoubtable Czech Philharmonic. 
                This might well have become a cycle 
                but the Chandos connection with Bĕlohlávek 
                ended with only symphonies 1, 4 and 
                6 under the Couzens’ belt. Chandos's 
                high calorie balance is gorgeously plush 
                and not lacking in detail. This time 
                the recording was in DDD but the coupling 
                is not as logical: Field Mass and 
                the Lidice Memorial. 
              
 
              
Bĕlohlávek’s 
                timings for No. 4 remain pretty similar. 
                The Panton Fourth: 32.56; Chandos 33.34 
                as against the 33.40 of Supraphon. The 
                interpretation has both lambency and 
                panache. In this 
                work Martinů shows himself a magician 
                of the orchestra and matches this with 
                luxuriant thematic and rhythmic invention. 
                This is most impressive. The finale’s 
                horn-lofted exuberance is excitingly 
                put across with a tawny ‘burble’ accenting 
                the joyously emphatic pay-off. 
                This compares well with the highly coloured 
                and zestful pioneering version by Martin 
                Turnovsky again with the Czech Phil. 
                The Turnovsky times at 31.51 and remains 
                a reference version if you can take 
                the 1967-8 ADD sound on Warner Apex 
                0927 49822 2. Ansermet's version with 
                the Suisse Romande orchestra although 
                in mono is extremely good also. 
              
 
              
The only really flawed 
                version in the mêlée is 
                that by Arthur Fagen which at 36.02 
                is flaccid and lacking drive quite apart 
                from being awash in the percussion balance 
                (Naxos 8.553349). I have not heard the 
                Walter Weller version on an old 1975 
                EMI LP nor the Bryden Thomson on Chandos. 
                The Jarvi on Bis is rip-roaringly good 
                (33.12 on Bis CD1371/1372) but in the 
                last movement short-changes the horn 
                choir in the pay-off energico. 
                Neumann on the old Supraphon 1970s ADD 
                set is excellent. There was to have 
                been a 1980s Neumann digital cycle of 
                the symphonies but only one disc was 
                completed: symphonies 3 and 6 issued 
                in Japan. 
              
 
              
Financial support for 
                the present project 
                comes from the Bohuslav Martinů 
                Foundation of Prague. 
              
 
              
This 
                recording was made with the benefit 
                of scholarly revisions by Sandra Bergmannová 
                (who also wrote the booklet notes) and 
                Aleš Březina for the Third and 
                Sharon Chloa for the Fourth. 
              
 
              
Pushed into choice 
                of the Fourth by itself you have to 
                hear the Turnovsky. At Apex prices it 
                is not a difficult choice and the finale 
                has never been so excitingly recorded 
                as it was for those 1967 sessions. In 
                the finale, a real touchstone for performers 
                and conductors, Turnovsky’s horn section 
                are given a bells-up edgy prominence 
                that has not been equalled though Bĕlohlávek 
                comes close. However if you want to 
                track a complete Martinů set in 
                the best modern sound, go for this one. 
                 
              
 
              
All in all this is 
                an auspicious launch for the first fresh 
                cycle of the new century. Supraphon 
                deserve to find a ready and appreciative 
                market as Martinů’s star continues 
                to rise. 
              
Rob Barnett