Both of these recordings, 
                originally made by HMV, are justly famous. 
                They have been in and out of the catalogue 
                (more often "in" than "out") 
                since their first releases. Now, in 
                new transfers by Mark Obert-Thorn, they 
                reach possibly their widest potential 
                audience thanks to Naxos. 
              
 
              
I’m not aware that 
                the two recordings have previously appeared 
                coupled together and in his useful notes 
                Ian Julier discusses the links between 
                the two composers represented on this 
                CD and the extent to which Wagner influenced 
                Tchaikovsky. He concludes that "rarely 
                has there been such a blatant passing 
                of potentially mutually sympathetic 
                composers by each other as ships in 
                the night." This is a provocative 
                judgment, but an interesting one, which 
                is given added spice since Furtwängler 
                was such a noted exponent of Wagner. 
                The present recording is, so far as 
                I know, his only studio traversal of 
                a Tchaikovsky symphony. 
              
 
              
It is a very impressive 
                and deeply considered reading. The long 
                adagio introduction to the first movement 
                is stoic and resigned in his hands. 
                When the main allegro arrives (10’21") 
                the basic tempo is fairly steady, the 
                music well articulated. Of course, as 
                was ever the case with this conductor, 
                there are numerous small modifications 
                of pace within the basic tempo, some 
                marked in the score, others not. However, 
                he was a master of such changes and 
                of transitions so the whole is completely 
                convincing. The entire movement is an 
                exhibition of great conducting to which 
                the BPO respond ardently. 
              
 
              
I’m less happy with 
                the second movement. To my ears the 
                basic tempo is sluggish and heavy. There’s 
                little evidence of charm (the tempo 
                marking is Allegro con grazia but 
                here the music has too little grace, 
                I find). The trio is downright lugubrious. 
                This movement should remind the listener 
                that Tchaikovsky was a great ballet 
                composer but that effect is not achieved 
                here. 
              
 
              
The March is free of 
                such idiosyncrasy. However, it is in 
                the finale that Furtwängler is 
                heard at his greatest. This is a reading 
                of gaunt sadness. Throughout the movement 
                the conductor ensures that his players 
                sustain a tremendous intensity. As the 
                searing conclusion arrives there is 
                a sense of loss and ineffable grief 
                but all is done nobly, without hysteria. 
                This is, in short, one of the most searching 
                accounts of this finale that I know. 
                Ian Julier points out that at the time 
                the recording took place both the general 
                situation in Germany and Furtwängler’s 
                personal position were fast deteriorating. 
                We can never know the extent to which 
                external events influence art but it 
                would not be surprising if Furtwängler’s 
                approach to this symphony at this time 
                was influenced by what was going on 
                around him. 
              
 
              
Earlier that same year 
                he had set down equally penetrating 
                accounts of the Tristan Prelude 
                and Liebestod. These are incandescent 
                readings and hearing them makes one 
                feel that this is music that Furtwängler 
                was born to conduct. In the Prelude 
                he unfolds Wagner’s music of erotic 
                longing seamlessly and inevitably. The 
                Liebestod is no less successful. The 
                music is built passionately yet patiently; 
                while one is listening to Furtwängler’s 
                interpretation one simply cannot imagine 
                the music sounding any other way. 
              
 
              
The transfers on this 
                Naxos CD seem to me to be very successful. 
                There’s a bit more surface hiss on the 
                Wagner items but nothing to detract 
                from enjoyment. As for the Tchaikovsky, 
                the recording sounds quite remarkable 
                for one cut 65 years ago. There’s a 
                great deal of detail reported (more 
                so than in the Wagner) and very little 
                distortion at climaxes. All told, Mark 
                Obert-Thorn has done a remarkable job. 
              
 
              
But it’s the performances 
                that matter most. The Wagner is truly 
                splendid. The Tchaikovsky may not convince 
                all listeners (as I’ve indicated, I 
                don’t much care for the treatment of 
                the second movement.) However, the music 
                making is never less than inspired and 
                inspiring. The contents of this CD should 
                be mandatory listening for all who relish 
                the art of conducting. 
              
John Quinn
              
see also reviews 
                of Christopher Howell and Jonathan Woolf