Without fail, these 
                are two works that should jump to the 
                top of any list of alternatives to the 
                warhorse violin concertos. Here are 
                two powerful works that possess every 
                quality that defines ‘classic’ except 
                perhaps the passage of sufficient time. 
                Bold, lyrical, rhythmic, charming, dramatic 
                and thought-provoking are just a few 
                of dozens of adjectives that could describe 
                this music. Add to that a superb performance 
                at a fantastic price and you have your 
                newest must-own compact disc. 
              
 
              
Myaskovsky’s fame lies 
                predominantly in his work as a symphonist. 
                With twenty-seven such works to his 
                credit, he is considered by many to 
                have been one of the leading exponents 
                of the genre in the twentieth century. 
                His violin concerto was his first attempt 
                at such a work, and he spent considerable 
                time studying the similar works of Beethoven, 
                Tchaikovsky and Prokofiev, his friend 
                and schoolmate. The late 1930s were 
                a fertile time for violin music in Russia, 
                due mostly to the rise of the so-called 
                "Russian violin school," with 
                David Oistrakh and Leonid Kogan at its 
                helm, winning competitions all over 
                Europe. 
              
 
              
Myaskovsky wrote his 
                concerto for and dedicated it to Oistrakh. 
                A large sweeping work in three movements, 
                the first of which is longer than the 
                latter two combined, the concerto owes 
                far more to the composer’s nineteenth 
                century predecessors Rimsky-Korsakov 
                and Balakirev, than to any sort of modernist 
                ideal. The opening movement is both 
                dramatic and lyrical and as its title 
                implies, passionate. The adagio is tuneful 
                and circumspect, while the rollicking 
                third movement is very dance-like. 
              
 
              
Although 
                Mieczyław Vainberg was a 
                disciple and pupil of Myaskovsky, his 
                style, although still conservative, 
                leans more toward his friend and colleague 
                Shostakovich than to any nineteenth 
                century composer. Born in Poland in 
                1919, Vainberg’s early promise was as 
                a pianist, but his hopes for a major 
                career were dashed by the Nazi invasion 
                of Poland during the Second World War. 
                He fled to, and was accepted warmly 
                in Russia, although on more than one 
                occasion he ran afoul of the authorities. 
                At one time he was arrested for being 
                an "enemy of the state" only 
                to be rescued by Shostakovich’s intervention 
                and ultimately, the death of Stalin. 
              
 
              
His concerto is of 
                much tighter construct than the Myaskovsky, 
                consisting of four movements nearly 
                equal in technical challenge, musical 
                expression and length. Of particular 
                note is the passionate, melancholy Adagio. 
                Although not particularly melodic, (you 
                are not likely to leave the room whistling 
                the tunes) there is a formal and thematic 
                unity about the work that makes the 
                listener eager to find out what comes 
                next. 
              
 
              
And what of Ilya Grubert’s 
                playing? In short, it is utterly refreshing. 
                Here is a soloist that takes command 
                of the stage, is not afraid of a risk 
                or two, and plays in a manner that reflects 
                his feelings for the music. When called 
                for, his playing can be as lyrical as 
                the finest soprano, yet he never shies 
                away from putting forth a bit of gypsy 
                abandon, allowing his tone to even at 
                times be a bit gritty. This is by no 
                means a criticism. Grubert digs into 
                the strings, coaxing every last ounce 
                of sound and spirit out of them. This 
                is indeed a player worth watching, and 
                if this recording is harbinger at all, 
                there are great things yet to come. 
              
 
              
Dmitry Yablonsky leads 
                a finely honed instrument in the Russian 
                Philharmonic Orchestra. Gone is the 
                customary Russian blatting and out of 
                tune wailing in the brass section. His 
                strings are warm and lush, and there 
                is a rhythmic tautness to the playing. 
                He paces both concerti perfectly, never 
                hurrying the fast passages and never 
                belaboring the slow ones. 
              
 
              
Recorded sound is excellent. 
                Program notes by Per Skans hold the 
                reader’s interest, and provide the correct 
                balance of analysis, historical background 
                and anecdote. 
              
 
              
These are two composers 
                who deserve further attention. Hopefully, 
                a few more successful recordings such 
                as this one will propel this music off 
                the silver disc and into the concert 
                hall. Go buy this one and enjoy some 
                unusual yet highly accessible delights. 
              
 
              
Kevin Sutton 
                
              
See also review 
                by Rob Barnett