BMG have shot themselves 
                in the foot with this release. Although 
                it is an SACD and the sound quality 
                is very good indeed, is 44’14" 
                long enough to warrant the additional 
                cost for a recording, good as it is 
                which is now almost 50 years old? Moreover, 
                it was, until relatively recently, available 
                on a double album containing Symphonies 
                4, 5 and 6 by these same artists. In 
                this format there is absolutely no difference 
                in sound quality between the audio CD 
                in the older coupling, and the SACD 
                version played on a standard CD player. 
              
 
              
Given the size of Monteux’s 
                recorded legacy with RCA, there is plenty 
                more material, which could have been 
                added to this disc to make it more competitive. 
                This is in the Living Stereo series 
                which improves every time of issue. 
                When they were originally released on 
                vinyl in this country, the Decca pressings 
                were not all that good. For a long time 
                the quality of the original recordings 
                remained hidden from us. It was only 
                with the advent of CD that these early 
                RCA issues began to show just how good 
                they were in terms of sound quality. 
                There were a few problem discs – i.e. 
                the first issue on CD of Brahms Piano 
                Concerto No. 2 with Gilels and Reiner 
                which sounded shallow, shrill and congested. 
                The latest issue on EMI ‘Great Conductor’ 
                series shows just how good the original 
                recording actually was. 
              
 
              
Enough of the recording, 
                how well does the performance of Tchaikovsky’s 
                masterpiece stand up against the competition? 
                Monteux was famous for his recordings 
                of the Swan Lake, Sleeping Beauty and 
                Nutcracker ballets and this is the quality 
                most to the fore in this recording. 
                As always with the Boston Orchestra 
                under Monteux, the playing is immaculate, 
                neat and tidy, and somewhat balletic 
                in nature. If you are looking for the 
                Russian passion of a Mravinsky or in 
                modern terms, perhaps Pletnev, you won’t 
                find it here. 
              
 
              
Tchaikovsky’s last 
                symphony is full of passion and when 
                played in this manner can move mountains. 
                Here, the mountains would hardly move. 
                However that does not negate this performance, 
                and much pleasure may be had. If you 
                are interested in hearing what the composer 
                actually wrote, laid out clearly and 
                concisely in good sound by an orchestra 
                who obviously loved the man they were 
                working with, this could be the disc 
                for you. 
              
 
              
Speeds are slightly 
                on the fast side of average and in this 
                day and age this is not a bad thing. 
                One very important feature of recordings 
                such as this is the superb acoustic 
                of Symphony Hall in Boston. Once again, 
                it was not until these recordings started 
                to be re-mastered for CD that they began 
                to be heard as the original engineers 
                recorded them, and as the original master 
                tapes had captured them. 
              
 
              
The first movement 
                has all the movement you would wish, 
                although the passion is held very much 
                in check. The second movement 5/4 waltz(?) 
                movement is very balletic, and if it 
                were not for the strange (for Tchaikovsky) 
                time signature, the movement could have 
                been lifted from one of the ballets. 
                The March goes at a good pace and generates 
                much of its excitement from the music 
                rather than flashy conducting. The last 
                movement is very moving, but not in 
                a heart-on-sleeve manner – the passion 
                comes from Tchaikovsky’s music itself. 
              
 
              
To sum up this is a 
                very fine issue, but measly on playing 
                time and value for money – much better 
                to look for the double album in the 
                second-hand shops – 09026 61901-2. 
              
John Phillips