A useful coupling this, 
                for, though Sibelius’s great 5th 
                is one of the most recorded symphonies 
                of the 20th century, the 3rd 
                has been much less fortunate, probably 
                because of its relatively small stature 
                and midway position in Sibelius’ output. 
                It can also seem like a lightweight 
                piece, though this is very misleading, 
                as in many ways it holds the key to 
                the great works that were to follow. 
              
 
              
There is a great deal 
                to enjoy and commend in these Sibelius 
                performances from Segerstam and the 
                fine Helsinki Philharmonic. The conductor 
                certainly takes no prisoners, and has 
                a refreshingly personal approach to 
                the scores. His tempi are chosen with 
                great care, and he throws new light 
                on some passages, such as the remarkable 
                fragmented development of the finale 
                of Symphony no.3, or the bridge which 
                joins the two parts of the first movement 
                of the 5th. 
              
 
              
Nevertheless, I ultimately 
                found the disc a disappointment. Though 
                certain movements work well, Segerstam 
                overplays the contrasts, highlights 
                instrumentation too much, and makes 
                at least one disastrous misjudgement. 
                This is at the final climax of the 5th, 
                where, as the crux is reached, he throws 
                away all his good approach work by massively 
                overdoing the slight acceleration 
                that Sibelius asks for (this is around 
                9:12 on track 6). Such a pity; a similar 
                tendency to drive the music forward 
                urgently is felt at the end of the 3rd, 
                but is there held in check, which I 
                found bracing. 
              
 
              
The orchestra 
                plays well, though for me Segerstam’s 
                voicing of the textures is overly bright, 
                with flutes and trumpets often simply 
                too loud. It is vital in this music 
                not to lose that understated, reserved 
                quality that characterises the composer. 
                It’s very possible that all of this 
                arises from Segerstam’s earnest desire 
                to ‘sell’ the music to listeners who 
                are less familiar with Sibelius; if 
                so, that is admirable but misguided, 
                for Sibelius can speak for himself with 
                unique power. 
              
Gwyn Parry-Jones