Comparison: Gustav Leonhardt 
                and Sigiswald Kuijken (dhm, 1973) 
              
Often Johann Sebastian 
                Bach is considered a rather conservative 
                composer. In some ways that may be true: 
                he preferred polyphony to the more easy-going 
                style which became fashionable in his 
                day and therefore was accused of writing 
                in a 'learned' style. But at the same 
                time Bach was able to break new ground, 
                as the six sonatas recorded here show. 
              
 
              
Bach was one of the 
                very first composers in history who 
                wrote pieces in which the harpsichord 
                wasn't reduced to accompanying one or 
                more melody instruments. He accorded 
                the instrument a concertato role which 
                gave both instruments equal importance. 
                In these six sonatas Bach linked up 
                with the tradition of the trio-sonata. 
                Here the right hand of the harpsichord 
                plays the part which in the trio-sonata 
                was played by one of the melody instruments 
                - the violin plays the other. The left 
                hand is playing the bass part, without 
                adding chords. 
              
 
              
These sonatas were 
                composed in Köthen, when Bach was 
                at the service of Prince Leopold von 
                Anhalt-Cöthen, and where he composed 
                some of his most famous instrumental 
                works. But later in his career he reworked 
                some of them. In particular the sixth 
                sonata has undergone several changes 
                over the years. It is thought that the 
                last revision took place around 1740. 
                This can be seen as an indication how 
                highly Bach valued these sonatas. In 
                fact, even his son Carl Philipp Emanuel 
                held them in high esteem. In 1774, he 
                wrote to Bach's first biographer, Johann 
                Nikolaus Forkel: "The six harpsichord 
                trios (...) are among the best works 
                of my late beloved father. They still 
                sound very good, and give me much pleasure, 
                although they are more than 50 years 
                old. They contain some adagios which 
                one can't make more melodious these 
                days". 
              
 
              
The fact that, whereas 
                no original manuscripts have survived, 
                no less than eight mostly complete copies 
                are extant, shows the wide admiration 
                enjoyed by these sonatas. 
              
 
              
The oldest source is 
                a manuscript for the harpsichord and 
                violin parts. The harpsichord part was 
                copied by Bach's nephew Johann Heinrich 
                Bach in 1725. The folio jacket bears 
                the title 'Sei Suonate a Cembalo certato 
                è Violino Solo, col Basso per 
                Viola da Gamba accompagnato se piace'. 
              
 
              
It will be nice when 
                the booklets of CD recordings mention 
                the instruments in the right order. 
                But here we find the usual order: '6 
                Sonate per Violino e Cembalo'. 
              
 
              
It is perhaps going 
                too far to say that the harpsichord 
                is the dominating partner; the violin 
                certainly doesn't play a subservient 
                role. But more often than not the harpsichord 
                starts the proceedings. In many recordings 
                this is not reflected by the balance 
                between the instruments. It isn't here, 
                either. Whether this is the result of 
                an artistic choice of the interpreters 
                or a matter of recording technique is 
                hard to tell. But here the violin tends 
                to dominate and sometimes even overpowers 
                the harpsichord. 
              
 
              
It has something to 
                do with the instruments. Christine Busch's 
                violin has a strong, penetrating sound, 
                whereas the harpsichord's sound is somewhat 
                muted, in particular in the descant. 
              
 
              
But I am sorry to say 
                that in the end it really doesn't matter 
                that much. This is a very disappointing 
                interpretation. The performance is very 
                straightforward, without real differentiation 
                in phrasing, articulation and dynamics. 
                The same notes usually are played the 
                same way, as if they are all equally 
                important. It does sound very unnatural 
                if - like here - there is no difference 
                in length or strength between the notes 
                in a sequence of semiquavers (Sonata 
                I, adagio) or in a melisma of demisemiquavers, 
                as in the adagio of Sonata III. 
              
 
              
There is also often 
                a lack of rhythmic pulse, for example 
                in the andante of the first sonata. 
                Here Leonhardt and Kuijken realise a 
                wonderful softly swaying rhythm. 
              
 
              
And when the liner 
                notes refer to the 'sighing figures' 
                (Seufzer) in the first movement of the 
                first Sonata, one would expect to hear 
                them. But that isn't the case. 
              
 
              
In general I felt the 
                tempi were slowish, but that is only 
                the case in some movements. On the whole 
                they are alright. But they seem rather 
                slow, because nothing happens which 
                catches the attention. The difference 
                between this new recording and the one 
                by Leonhardt and Kuijken is that between 
                a lecture and a story. The latter do 
                everything to make the audience listen 
                and they appeal to their imagination. 
              
 
              
The fact that a recording 
                like this can't really compete with 
                one from 30 years ago does give some 
                food for thought ... 
              
Johan van Veen