To anybody interested in early music, and over the 
          age of about 25, the name of David Munrow will loom large as a formative 
          influence in any listening development. In a career spanning only ten 
          years, Munrow lit the firmament of early music like a comet. From 1966 
          until his death in 1976 he was a force that almost single-handedly brought 
          medieval and renaissance music out of the closet of musicology and onto 
          the mainstream concert circuit. The energy of the man was, by all accounts, 
          incredible, and it is a testament to that very energy that his recorded 
          legacy is so vast. This spans not only the dozen or so recordings (most 
          of which were large collections of multiple LPs covering, in depth, 
          specific repertoires, eras or genres), but also a book on medieval and 
          renaissance instruments. Then again there were hundreds of live concerts. 
          Probably even more influential were over five hundred editions of BBC 
          Radio 3’s "Pied Piper" in which this entirely self-taught phenomenon 
          researched, wrote and presented programmes on a bewildering range of 
          musical topics, by no means restricted to early music. 
        
 
        
It is over twenty-five years since Munrow's death and 
          yet only in recent years have the recordings begun to be re-issued on 
          CD. Many of them are still not available. Thus, this re-issue on Archiv's 
          new "Blue" label is all the more welcome for this was Munrow's last 
          major recording project and has long been considered as probably his 
          finest achievement in the studio. In 1976, when this recording was first 
          released, medieval music was by no means unknown, but then neither was 
          it standard concert repertoire. It was still likely to be viewed as 
          an engaging eccentricity. It is remarkable that these discs still sound 
          so fresh and lively, even in the light of a quarter century of advance 
          in our understanding of the performance traditions surrounding this 
          repertoire. Obviously, Munrow was approaching this music from the perspective 
          of an instrumentalist, and the use of instruments in these performance 
          is somewhat more prominent than is fashionable today. Indeed, it must 
          be admitted that Munrow's preference for the doubling of vocal lines 
          with bells gets overdone at times. However, the instruments do give 
          a wide range of colours to the music that, even if not so historically 
          "correct" as we tend to be now, make, nonetheless, for a varied aural 
          diet and certainly add to the variety of the programme. 
        
 
        
The booklet that accompanies this re-issue does not 
          include much in the way of information about the works recorded, but 
          it does include an illuminating essay by Daniel Leech-Wilkinson about 
          the way in which Munrow went about conceiving and bringing to fruition 
          this type of project. Leech-Wilkinson's most perspicacious point, and 
          one that defines the reason for the enormous success of this recording, 
          is that Munrow had an uncanny gift for finding and engaging great singers. 
          It was this feature more than any other that made the Early Music Consort 
          of London such a cut above the norm for its time. Indeed, looking at 
          the list of singers we see what amounts to a roll-call of the major 
          names of the current English early music scene. These singers were all 
          capable of performing this repertoire with the technical assurance that 
          makes the difference between the "amusingly eccentric" and 
          the "perspective-altering" reception of a performance. Indeed, 
          it is interesting to notice that amongst the singers are David James, 
          John Potter and Rogers (curiously always mis-spelt as Roger) Covey-Crump, 
          three of the four singers of the Hilliard Ensemble who were to become 
          the most obvious successors to Munrow’s group in this sort of repertoire. 
          With the Hilliard Ensemble these three recorded the great Pérotin 
          four-voiced organa (Viderunt omnes and Sederunt principes) 
          in the late 1980s for ECM. It is remarkable how much of the quality 
          of the performance recorded on this disc is still apparent in the Hilliard’s 
          later recording. It is these two organa of Pérotin that stood 
          out when the collection was released, and they are still the high-point 
          today. These mighty four-part works were already famous, but this performance 
          laid bare the inner architecture of Pérotin’s music in a way 
          that had not been attempted before. It was only the quality of the singers, 
          both technically and interpretatively, that allowed this to be the case. 
          These are ‘defining’ performances. 
        
 
        
There are many other things of great beauty in this 
          collection. The seven instrumental Hocketts that open CD 2 are notable, 
          as is the wonderful performance of Machaut’s four-voiced motet Christe, 
          qui lux es, with slide trumpet and tenor shawm as well as two voices. 
          It would have been easy for a collection like this to centre on the 
          well known names of Léonin, Pérotin and Machaut, and yet 
          Munrow’s conception was more all-encompassing than that. Certainly Philippe 
          de Vitry and Adam de la Halle are names known to most people with any 
          scholarly interest in this period, and yet Bernard de Cluny and Petrus 
          de Cruce would probably, even today, be regarded as obscure, at best. 
          In attempting to give a complete overview of the chosen period Munrow 
          allied a scholarly approach of great depth and detail to a manner of 
          interpretation and performance that would allow the music to live in 
          its contemporary time. That the recording allows the music to live again 
          in our time is a sure testament to the quality and rigour of Munrow’s 
          approach. This collection remains a fascinating document both as a recreation 
          of early music in wonderful performances, and as a reminder of that 
          most exciting period of early music re-discovery in the mid-1970s. Without 
          a doubt, this collection deserves a place in the library of anybody 
          who claims an interest in early music. 
        
 
        
Peter Wells