I’ve been reviewing this unfolding series with considerable 
          interest. It’s now the turn of Koppel’s chamber music – the next volume 
          will give us his vocal works. I do subscribe to the prevailing orthodoxy 
          regarding Koppel’s compositional lineage, which is broadly an axis of 
          Bartók, Stravinsky and Nielsen (with an admixture of Prokofiev 
          of whose music he was a noted exponent) but this is I think to underestimate 
          the range of his ambition and the technical skill he employs, to say 
          nothing of the sophistication of his thematic material. As well as being 
          an especially fine pianist (several examples here – and his concerto 
          performances in a previous edition gave us indisputable proof of the 
          bigness of his technique) his brother Julius was the violist in the 
          Koppel Quartet (led by Julius’s wife Else Marie Bruun). Koppel was thus 
          perfectly placed to dedicate works – five of his quartets amongst other 
          things – to his brother’s quartet and to take advantage of intimate 
          discussions surrounding them. 
        
 
        
If in general I am more immediately attracted to his 
          larger scale works it’s not to imply that these are negligible works 
          – far, far from it. He wrote widely for chamber forces and always with 
          idiomatic understanding; nothing here is forced or crude. He wrote about 
          ten each of trios, quartets, quintets and sextets and an equal number 
          of sonatas for violin, cello and woodwinds. The works in this double 
          set clearly reflect his interest in and relative absorption of other 
          models, such as those noted above, but there is always a consonance 
          about Koppel’s music that is a measure of his integrity. The set begins 
          with the Second Quartet. The hints at folk influences, a Bartókian 
          heritage, become increasingly explicit in the opening movement marked 
          Allegro fresco, con espressione with some free wheeling 
          thematic development and a sense of generous flux. The slow movement, 
          the longest of the three is sweetly melancholic; the cello – as so often 
          in Koppel – has a strongly independent line and the first violin has 
          a part tailor-made for expressive soaring. And in this performance, 
          recorded by Danish radio in 1962, Bruun does just that. The chugging 
          rhythms of the finale impart a breathless animation to a movement that 
          seems to be getting nowhere (deliberately so). The registral disparities 
          between the string instruments are very well exploited in this knowing 
          and well-judged movement. 
        
 
        
The third quartet was recorded by the national radio 
          in March 1957 in Copenhagen. It’s in Koppel’s best organically interweaved 
          style, sometimes sinewy, sometimes tough but always explicable – the 
          texture remains light. The initial severity of the long opening Allegro 
          soon relaxes into a more solid and avuncular mien, Koppel cleverly simmering 
          his material in preparation for a quietly propulsive section full of 
          energy and drive. His muse here is one of stern affection, his means 
          those of furtive scurry, lyrical melody emerging with effortless logic. 
          With mutes on the string players’ rocking sweetness gives the Andante 
          a very particular texture before mutes now removed the central section 
          becomes animated by a songful, perhaps over insistent drive, flecked 
          by a sinuous cello line and rhythmically propulsive energy. The finale 
          is once more active and full of momentum – I liked the violin’s rather 
          cocky little tune accompanied by pizzicati and humorous drone cello. 
        
 
        
The Piano Quintet was recorded in Copenhagen commercially 
          by EMI in 1956. A twenty-five minute, three-movement work, it is ingenious 
          in conception and thoroughly splendid in execution. The driving, rather 
          implacable opening leads to the emergence of themes in different keys 
          (a Koppel trait); the tone is ruminatively brusque at times. I’d hesitate 
          to call it Brahmsian in that sense, but it is a big-boned and strong 
          work. The slow movement opens rather strangely – four pizzicati over 
          the piano’s descending chordal line (it lends the opening a strangely 
          sweet melancholy) – and the movement as a whole seems occasionally fractured 
          and withdrawn; wounded almost. The scurrying finale is imaginatively 
          voiced, with some almost disembodied lines for the string players, the 
          piano announcing a distinct air of unresolved tension before all pull 
          themselves together for a decisive finale. A big work, difficult to 
          judge quite in respect of its emotional temperature, but deeply worth 
          getting to know and quite splendidly performed by the dedicatees. 
        
 
        
Since the works are given chronologically, from the 
          Second Quartet Op. 34 to the Op. 88 Trio we can trace Koppel’s development 
          the better. It would have helped to have dates of composition but unfortunately 
          they are absent. Ternio – for cello and piano – is a three-movement 
          suite, short and pithy, ranging from skittish interplay (graced with 
          neo-classical impulse) through a curiously involving Passacaglia second 
          movement, not unmindful of humour, to a brio laden giocoso finale. The 
          Cello Sonata was recorded for Louisiana Records in 1959 and I liked 
          it. There is real lyric intensity in the cello writing (the excellent 
          Koppel associate Erling Blöndal Bengtsson). The marcato section 
          is especially appealing. The self-styled "Bartók variations" 
          second movement Chaconne (both Koppel and Bengtsson apparently referred 
          to it thus) opens in interior fashion but soon blazes into life before 
          returning to a mordant keening. The finale is full of quixotic rhythm 
          – flighty, hinting at the Iberian and generally lightening the emotional 
          explosiveness and breadth of the slow movement. The solo Cello suite 
          is in five movements – the first is meditative and reflexive with hints 
          of incipient agitation, the central Molto Tranquillo is spare and elliptical 
          and the finale begins uneasily but ends with decisive blows. 
        
 
        
Danacord give brief notes about the compositions in 
          general but have line-by-line descriptions of the music, which are exhaustive, 
          and happily have track timings in the margin so one can relate the description 
          to what one actually hears. The brief synopsis of the Trio says that 
          it reflects Koppel’s experience of the then avant-garde – principally 
          Boulez and Stockhausen – and this is undeniable. But despite the abrasions 
          and the intervallic lacunae Koppel’s lyricism remains intact. The unsettled 
          opening ends, indeed, with a brand of stern and unyielding neo-classicist 
          drive. Rightly the detailed notes point out the chain writing for piano 
          and the repetitions, allusions and general density of the writing of 
          the second movement, a fast and concentrated drama. The third movement, 
          a Theme with Variations lasting six minutes, is the pellucid heart of 
          the work, an intensely expressive and complexly structured movement. 
          Sparse sometimes to the point of ellipsis it assumes greater and greater 
          weight as the variations succeed each other. The finale opens in martial 
          fashion but fractures almost immediately - and contrary to all musical 
          expectation - into scurry and broken lines before ending in something 
          approaching convincing resolution. 
        
 
        
Danacord’s devotion to Koppel shows every sign of restoring 
          him "in the round." With modern recordings of his symphonic 
          works available this historical series expands the breadth of his works 
          and performances, allowing us to hear the composer-performer at work. 
          It does so, needless to say, with as much intelligence and attention 
          to detail as before. 
        
 
        
Jonathan Woolf