I am pleased to welcome this disc as I was very impressed 
          with its predecessor (Symphonies 6 and 7, reviewed in June 2001). This 
          is Volume 2, so I hope I haven’t missed any further releases in this 
          series. A co-production between Dacapo and Danish Radio, the recordings 
          are models of their kind: clear and detailed and well balanced by the 
          sound engineers. 
        
 
        
Are these symphonies as interesting to listen to as 
          their later cousins? I think yes. Both are in the common three movement 
          configuration which many Scandinavian composers use for this form of 
          composition. The First Symphony is known as an apprentice work. Initially 
          both this and the second symphony were forbidden by the composer to 
          be performed. 
        
 
        
Herman Koppel had been an admirer of the works of Carl 
          Nielsen and in 1929, Nielsen wrote a recommendation - "The young 
          artist Mr. Herman Koppel, has already, as both pianist and composer, 
          revealed such uncommon abilities that it is a pleasure for me to give 
          him my warmest recommendation. Mr. Koppel, who has now concluded his 
          four year course, has been a great asset to the Royal Academy during 
          these years, and I am convinced that a study trip abroad at this point 
          would be of the greatest importance to his further artistic career, 
          in view of which I yet again give him my best possible recommendation 
          and good wishes on his way." 
        
 
        
This recommendation allowed Koppel to travel to Germany 
          for a course of study, primarily in Berlin where he spent his time composing 
          and attending concerts. This symphony was completed during this period, 
          and received its first performance on 23rd February 1931 by the conductor 
          Emil Telmányi in the society Dansk Koncertforening. It 
          was broadcast live on radio. In Koppel’s own words the first performance 
          was "a crashing failure", and the symphony received harsh 
          words in the newspaper reviews. It was seen as derivative: more Nielsen 
          than Koppel. The composer was very disappointed with the work’s failure, 
          and forbade further performances. 
        
 
        
The Second Symphony was the first of a series of three 
          "war symphonies" and was written in 1943, when Denmark had 
          been under Nazi occupation for about three years. This would be about 
          six months before the Jewish persecutions lead the composer into exile. 
          This work is much longer than the First Symphony, running to almost 
          41 minutes. The first movement begins with a very beautiful cantabile 
          theme on bassoon and celli. This becomes animated with the second subject 
          on the violins and leads to a forceful climax. The themes of this are 
          further reworked in the development and the movement ends with a fugue 
          accompanied by trombone as a cantus firmus. The second movement 
          is marked molto expressivo, and is the most serious of the three. 
          The third movement opens with an elegiac passage and the resulting peaceful 
          atmosphere is soon shattered by a violent march which begins the main 
          part of the movement. This finishes unresolved with a question mark. 
        
 
        
The symphony, dedicated to his wife, was given in the 
          Tivoli Concert Hall, Copenhagen, and although not receiving the artistic 
          savaging of its predecessor, also disappointed the composer who later 
          deleted it from his list of compositions without returning to it again. 
        
 
        
Dacapo is to be congratulated on having the courage 
          to record two such works. Now, in the fullness of time, they don’t sound 
          nearly as bad as seems to have been thought at the time. Given the advocacy 
          of orchestra, conductor and recording engineers, this issue deserves 
          a wide circulation – I liked it very much. 
        
 
        
John Phillips