One of my rules of thumb for listening to, and enjoying 
          the music of Charles Ives is to try not to play 'spot the tune.' If 
          we fall into the trap of seeing this music as some kind of arrangement 
          or transcription of hymn tunes or circus marches we will tend to miss 
          much of its intellectual depth and sheer musicality. To be fair, Ives 
          uses a number of such tunes in his Third Symphony - including 'What 
          a Friend we have in Jesus' and 'Oh for a Thousand Tongues.' Yet these 
          are a vehicle for expressing the inexpressible. This music is not primitive. 
          It is not, I believe, even meant to be sentimental or full of pathos. 
          All this is not to say that we should not enjoy a tune simply because 
          it is or has been popular. Of course there will always be sentimental 
          baggage with many of these musical quotations. It is simply that we 
          must not allow an apparent banality to spoil our enjoyment of this excellent 
          music. 
        
 
        
The programme notes of this fine CD suggest that there 
          is a 'programme' to Third Symphony. Now I do agree that this is superficially 
          correct. Each of the three movements carries a subtitle:- Old Folks 
          Gatherin'; Children’s Day and Communion. The very title of 
          the Symphony is 'The Camp Meeting'. Yet I believe that what this 
          symphony is actually doing is recreating spiritually and not pictorially 
          the emotions engendered by the old time religion that Ives knew as a 
          boy. It is not an attempt at painting a musical picture; it is not an 
          attempt at preserving a number of well-known tunes. This work is perhaps 
          the most subtle and introspective of the composer’s symphonic cycle. 
          It was completed in 1904 but was not premiered until 1946. I enjoyed 
          this recording by the Northern Sinfonia and appreciated the intimate 
          almost chamber music qualities of the playing. 
        
 
        
The Holidays Symphony is actually a collection 
          of four somewhat disparate works that hold together simply by being 
          musical evocation of American holidays. One movement is given here: 
          Washington's Birthday. This stands very well on its own and impresses 
          with its sharp contrast between winter night atmospherics and a barn 
          dance complete with Jew’s harp. 
        
This may not be great music but it certainly inhabits 
          a unique sound world. 
        
 
        
Perhaps Ives’ most famous and popular (if that is the 
          correct word to use) work is 'The Unanswered Question.' This 
          piece was paired with 'Central Park in the Dark,' and was given 
          the overall title of 'Two Contemplations.' The Unanswered 
          Question has a number of alternative titles and these perhaps give 
          some clues to the work's meaning. These include 'a Cosmic Landscape,' 
          a 'Contemplation of a Serious Matter' and 'The Unanswered Serious Question.' 
          It was composed around 1906 but was subject to a number of revisions 
          in the 1930s. It is written very much in the style of a collage; one 
          piece of music being piled on top of another. Constant contrast of styles 
          and a throwing together of disparate themes are what makes this work 
          tick. It is all about 'cosmic drama’. We have here the silence of the 
          Druids, the perennial question of existence and a number of attempts 
          at an answer. This was music that was well ahead of its time. It took 
          other avant-garde composers more than half a century to catch up. Yet 
          to us this music is elemental; it is near perfect in its balance of 
          sounds, structures and noise. 
        
 
        
Central Park in the Dark is less demanding on 
          our cosmological and philosophical understandings. It is quite simply 
          an evocation of the moods and emotions engendered by a night-time view 
          of Manhattan in the last decade of the Nineteenth Century. We are reminded 
          of trains, popular songs, pianolas, ragtime and even a runaway horse 
          - apparently. However the work is framed on either side by brooding 
          string music summing up the darkness of the park against the bright 
          lights of the city streets. The listener begins in the park, emerges 
          into the city and retreats to the park. It is Yankee impressionism at 
          its very best. 
        
 
        
The Country Band March is pure fun. All 
          the Ivesian characteristics are present: the well known tunes, two melodies 
          playing at once and exuberant orchestration. Here the composer manages 
          to glory in humouring the wrong notes of the players and the falling 
          apart of the rhythmic momentum. Altogether an excellent piece to introduce 
          the neophyte to this great American Composer. 
        
 
        
The Overture and March '1776' is less well known. 
          However it is really quite a classic. It was originally conceived as 
          an overture to an opera about the 'revolutionary era'. It is very much 
          a parody of the 'slow' march' and allows the composer to quote a number 
          of well-known tunes, including the La Marseillaise. The quieter 
          and slower parts of this work are actually quite profound. 
        
 
        
Taken in the round, this is an excellent introduction 
          to the orchestral music of Charles Ives. It explores quite a wide range 
          of emotion; from the spirituality of old time religion at its best through 
          to the festivities of Washington's Birthday and the strains of a country 
          band playing at some local event. Here are all the Ives fingerprints 
          presented in the space of a single CD. I am a bit disappointed that 
          this otherwise great CD is so short on material. There is less than 
          50 minutes of music! Bad form for Naxos, I am afraid. However, the sound 
          recording is good and the playing enthusiastic. 
        
 
        
John France