There’s certainly a lot of gritty energy in the sonata. 
          It might be considered a typical modern performance, the fast movements 
          pushed beyond the tempi the likes of Rubinstein accustomed us to, the 
          slow ones pulled back slower. In dynamics it also courts extremes, from 
          the poundingly loud (a close recording makes it difficult to judge whether 
          the pianist actually is "going through" the tone) to the intensely 
          hushed, with not a lot between. It’s impressive in a way but in the 
          last resort I’d rather hear a real Shostakovich sonata than a Chopin 
          sonata touted out as one. 
        
 
        
The Preludes are a slightly different matter. Shelley 
          perhaps needs a little time to settle in, since the first prelude is 
          badly sectionalised and there are some odd dynamics elsewhere in the 
          first few. But from no. 6 onwards I began to respect this as a faithful 
          and musical performance, the tempi all within the bounds of reason, 
          the dynamics scrupulously observed and precious few liberties taken. 
        
 
        
So why was I not more engaged? I can only explain this 
          by recalling the words of a schoolboy who, in Jerome K. Jerome’s "Three 
          Men on the Bummel", at the end of ten minutes reading a poem about 
          a maiden who lived in a wood, can tell the professor no more than that 
          it was "the usual sort of wood". The professor took a dim 
          view of the boy’s answer; Jerome couldn’t see why it was not good enough. 
          So, while some readers may take a dim view of me, I can only report 
          that this is the usual sort of performance, with the usual sort of tempi, 
          the usual sort of sound, the usual sort of rubato and so on. I can’t 
          see any particular reason for not recommending it, nor any particular 
          reason for recommending it either. It sounds like a fine performance, 
          yet it fails to convince me that it actually is one. The free 
          spirit of Cortot, the aristocratic ardour of Rubinstein, the loving 
          care of Milkina, just to mention a few classic performances, can occasionally 
          exasperate – the penalty for commanding the heights is that you risk 
          a few troughs too – but they more often inspire. It’s awfully 
          subjective of me but I hear only perspiration in this case. 
        
 
        
I’m sorry to practically write off a disc about which 
          there is little bad to say. Readers who normally respond to this pianist 
          will maybe find a whole lot more in it than I did. 
        
 
        
Christopher Howell