Naxos continue their exploration of the first ever 
          cycle of the Beethoven Symphonies undertaken by one conductor – albeit 
          one that came about as much by default, re-recording and opportunism 
          as by foresight. Weingartner’s first recordings in the cycle came in 
          1923 (though he’d recorded much earlier still, as a piano accompanist 
          to his then wife) but the earlier acoustics were generally supplanted 
          in time by electrics from 1926 onwards. There were multiple recordings 
          therefore of some but only one recording of the Pastoral and 
          the Fourth. The Eroica displays many of Weingartner’s greatest 
          strengths; the opening has a splendid drive - virile, lithe with clear 
          accents, precision of chording and little variation in tempi. He is 
          wise over distinctions between sforzati and equally so in terms of the 
          trajectory of the movement as a whole. The funeral march however is 
          the movement that will encourage most debate because here, famously, 
          Weingartner ignores the stricture he himself made in his book on the 
          performance of the Beethoven symphonies. The movement is certainly one 
          of great (but typically not grandiose) nobility and restraint, the clarinet 
          singing out with affecting depth, balance between string choirs splendidly 
          maintained. But whereas he counselled specifically against hurrying 
          at bar 69 et seq here he does pretty much precisely that – as he does 
          in the fugal section – and he ignores his earlier stern suggestion of 
          crotchet = 66-72 by taking it at something more like 56-96, thus subjecting 
          the movement to far wider tempo extremes than one would otherwise have 
          expected of someone’s of Weingartner’s assumed sobriety. Whether one 
          accepts his solution is an individual matter – and it goes, presumably, 
          to show that prescriptive concordats are modified over time and through 
          experience. Very few things are writ in stone. The scherzo though is 
          wonderfully animated and the Finale splendid – crisp and dramatic. 
        
 
        
The Fourth was recorded a few years earlier with Beecham’s 
          new LPO and I can recommend it unreservedly as an example of Weingartner’s 
          sagacity. There is gravity in the opening followed by excellently graded 
          string tone, the winds moulded with a degree of plasticity that never 
          becomes lax. The Adagio develops an organic life, the bass line firm 
          but not cloying or clogging – mobility is the aim – and the ebullience 
          of the Scherzo is palpable, sprung with delicious weight, moving forward 
          with real drive (see the almost contemporaneous recording by Erich Kleiber 
          which is consistently slower than Weingartner for the first three movements 
          before it unleashes a bullet of a finale). Weingartner in fact observes 
          the ma non troppo direction for that Finale – adding witty exchanges 
          between the crisp and vibrant strings, wind and the running double bass 
          line. 
        
 
        
Restoration by Mark Obert-Thorn, which is good, includes 
          some added reverberation in the Fourth – he cites the original pressing 
          as having been boxy. I’m not otherwise greatly in favour of this but 
          it has been done discreetly here. 
        
 
        
Jonathan Woolf