The two symphonies are presented cleanly - each with a disc 
        to itself. 
         
        
As works, while the Tenth has the ingredients of memorability 
          inherent in excoriating drama, accessible themes and treatment the Fourth 
          is more forbidding. You might compare Nielsen's Fifth and Sixth (popular 
          and enigmatic side by side), Walton 1 and 2, Prokofiev 7 and 6, Rubbra 
          4 and 8, Braga Santos 4 and 5, Sibelius 2 and 4, Bax 5 and 1. The effect 
          is similar. Rather as he did with Nielsen 6 (also on Sony Essential 
          Classics) Ormandy illuminates the Shostakovich Fourth more clearly than 
          I have heard before. 
        
 
        
Shostakovich's Fourth Symphony had to wait a quarter 
          of a century for its premiere. Fritz Stiedry had the work in rehearsal 
          with the Leningrad Philharmonic but at this time an attack on his opera 
          Lady MacBeth of Mtsensk and the purging of his mentor Mikhail 
          Tukhachevsky dictated that the work be withdrawn. In due time the Fifth 
          Symphony emerged to Party acclaim. Its overtones of compromise or sarcasm 
          are still debated but it remains the composer's most famous and most 
          played symphony. If the Fourth was driven into the shadows by Stalin, 
          the death of Stalin liberated the Tenth Symphony. Within months of the 
          dictator's death in 1953 Shostakovich began work on the symphony, starting 
          it in April and finishing it on 25 October 1953. It was premiered in 
          Leningrad in 17 December 1953. 
        
 
        
If we discount the brilliant but for this listener 
          unlovable First Symphony, the Fourth was his first absolute symphony; 
          one without stated programmatic content. No doubt its power to startle 
          and disconcert was intensified by the contrast with its two predecessors 
          which had overt Communist content. The Fourth had no such indicators 
          and their lack, coupled with the strong dissonances in the first movement 
          (try 12.03 onwards in the first movement) made the work a natural victim 
          of cultural and political paranoia. 
        
 
        
Ormandy and his orchestra give both symphonies laceratingly 
          virtuosic performances. The playing lacks nothing in garish colour; 
          snarl and sneer toll relentlessly through the bassoon and oboe lines 
          at 24.03 of the Fourth Symphony's first movement. The 1963 recording 
          holds up extremely well especially when compared with results captured 
          by Russian engineers recording in Moscow and Leningrad at the time. 
          I was expecting an overly smooth approach purged of jaggedness, cauterising 
          acid and raw satire. I could not have misjudged the approach more. The 
          soured and searing Mahlerian Largo-Allegro is, for example, played 
          with no-holds-barred hysteria, ready charnel-house humour (10.49), joyous 
          romanticism garnered from Prokofiev's Romeo and Juliet (13.01) 
          and a quietly contented ostinato which in its less complicated way looks 
          forward to the haunted ticking of the finale of the Fifteenth Symphony. 
          Ormandy is savagely exuberant in the Allegro though lacks quite the 
          slashing bite and scourging cordite of Mravinsky or Kondrashin. 
        
 
        
No Shostakovich expert can afford to be without these 
          recordings which are inexpensively coupled. Ormandy gave the first performances 
          of the Fourth on the warm side of the Iron Curtain. The Fourth is a 
          significant recording both as a 'document' put down within months of 
          the Western premiere and as an interpretation showing Ormandy's DSCH empathy. 
        
 
         
        
Rob Barnett