The Third Symphony was the last Scriabin wrote. 
          He was thirty two at the time of its completion in 1904. The Second 
          had been finished three years earlier and it was around that time 
          that Scriabin began increasingly immersing himself in philosophical 
          literature (e.g. Nietzsche), developing and expounding his ideas in 
          writings of his own. His notion of music as a synthesised art form (drawing 
          on literary, poetic, philosophical and other elements) that could put 
          us in touch with some sort of spiritual realm helped him to acquire 
          something of a cult following. The ideas were not a million miles away 
          from some of those that Wagner derived from Schopenhauer in writing 
          Tristan. Tristan can stand as a powerful musical experience 
          for those who know little of, or don't understand, its Schopenhaueran 
          origins (the great majority I suspect). Can Scriabin's Third Symphony 
          stand the same test? 
        
 
        
This unwieldy beast of a work was launched on a thermal 
          of pseudo-metaphysical hot air. I suggest that its potential to stay 
          aloft (and pass the aforementioned test) depends very much on the conviction 
          of the performance. The obvious condition for this is a conductor who 
          really believes in the music and has the ability to convey his/her conviction 
          to the players. Sadly, this prerequisite does not appear to be in place 
          here. One has only to take the first few pages of score and compare 
          Gielen’s performance with a recording that has been well regarded for 
          many years. The late Sir John Pritchard, of all people, in conducting 
          the BBC Symphony Orchestra, conveys at the opening the clearly intended 
          aura of mystery and portentousness, then seamlessly moves into the allegro 
          with admirable inevitability. Scriabin’s transitions are not easy to 
          navigate yet in a work where there are many such moments it is essential 
          that organic growth is achieved, by whatever skilful sleight of hand, 
          otherwise the overall structure can become tediously sectionalised. 
        
 
        
Gielen does not seem to have what it takes. There is 
          not the same sense of mystery, and in a work that is melodically cyclical 
          in nature he still manages to sectionalise it with poorly handled transitions. 
          Scriabin’s vital soaring phrases, musical fingerprints symbolic of an 
          aspiration to free the spirit, are jumped at by Gielen so they sound 
          like passing moments rather than an essential part of the narrative. 
          The playing is competent enough and Scriabin’s novel textures often 
          sound well but there is not the sense of commitment that can be heard 
          with the BBC players. Also, Pritchard gets a more voluptuous tone from 
          his strings, employing at times a hint of note sliding that goes well 
          with the music and is in keeping with the practice of the time. Perhaps 
          it is no wonder that Gielen does not convey the necessary conviction 
          for, as outlined in a note in the booklet, he seems to have taken up 
          the work for the wrong reasons. In a visit to the USA in the early seventies 
          he says he chose it so as not to do "what everyone else always 
          plays", and also, "to force myself to learn this kind of piece". 
        
 
        
For those who are looking for a Scriabin Third only, 
          then there are other fine recordings around. A suitably 
          Russian offering is Pletnev’s DG recording with the Russian National 
          Orchestra. Coupled with an outstanding poème d’extase, 
          the Symphony has a gravitas to it that brings conviction. 
          For those wanting to come to grips with examples of Scriabin’s orchestral 
          works including all three symphonies, then there is Ricardo Muti’s bargain 
          EMI two-disc set that brings real excitement to the Third Symphony. 
          Both have better sound quality. 
        
 
        
Back to the Gielen disc. The overall offering makes 
          for an interesting orchestral recital but again there are better performances 
          of the fillers. For example, Busoni’s atmospheric Berceuse élégiaque 
          generates much more atmosphere in a recent Chandos recording with 
          the BBC Philharmonic under Järvi. It seems that Hänssler Classic, 
          who have a special relationship with the SWR Sinfonieorchester Baden-Baden 
          und Freiburg Leitung, have simply dug into the orchestra’s archives 
          and served up on one disc an arbitrary collection of recordings made 
          over many years (the one of the Symphony is over a quarter of 
          a century old!), all with their former conductor, Michael Gielen. 
          
          John Leeman