MacDowell’s interest in big orchestral works was relatively
brief – no more than seven years – and concentrated between 1884 and 1890,
the years during which he wrote the works recorded here. All were begun
whilst he was living in Germany, in Liszt’s indomitable shadow and strongly
influenced both by him and by Wagner. MacDowell was, in any case, well
placed to adapt their descriptive procedures to his own, somewhat less
grandiose, ends. This Bridge issue of 1966 performances recorded in London
reverses the chronology by presenting the Roland Fragments first. Originally
intended as the inner movements of a projected four-movement symphony
they were to take their place as part of the wider panorama of the Song
of Roland but the surviving movements show how well MacDowell combined
technical, expressive and melodic material in pursuit of his ambitious
schema. The first of the two Fragments, The Saracens, is saturated in
Wagnerian feeling. Martial, with muted brass and aggressive, animating
pizzicati MacDowell is fully in command of his material, deploying and
redeploying it to strategic effect, the waltz-like contrastive central
section acting as a kind of sonata form. In the second Fragment, The Lovely
Aldâ, these processes and procedures become somewhat more explicit
in their conflict of diatonic and chromatic thematic material – which
is not to say they are brazenly obvious, more that he tries to imply changed
emotional states through the use of minimally changed thematic material.
The earliest tone poem is Hamlet/Ophelia Op 22 – creatively
sparked by a glut of Shakespeare going whilst the young composer and
his wife were in London. The passionate opening of Hamlet becomes troubled
and developmentally bold and aspirant. MacDowell inserts an Ophelia
theme into the central section cleverly entwined with the Tristan theme
on the horns before a quiescent, reflective ending closes the piece.
Ophelia meanwhile is shorter but shares linked material and reminiscences
repeated in slightly reorchestrated passages. A more stringent central
panel gives way to more rustic material, much play being given to the
lyrical theme on the lower strings and the Elysian piping above it.
The sound here is a little congested – which doesn’t do absolute justice
to MacDowell’s scoring which is ever fruitful even if this early example
seems to me, whilst aspiring to Lisztian models, to be faltering in
its inspiration.
Lancelot und Elaine is notable for its extreme compression
of narrative incident. It’s a rigorously descriptive tone poem, taking
as its literary source Tennyson’s Idylls of the King. The highly detailed
and reflective writing evokes the love, wanderings and drama implicit
in the poem – ominous brass and drums, innocent and passionate declamation
and a note struck of ultimate reflection and contemplation. Again the
skeleton upon which MacDowell clothes the narrative is essentially sonata
form – three themes, repetition of material and a coda. Lamia, Op 29
again employs sonata form, this time combined with variation form. He
takes Keats this time and the doomed tragedy of Lamia and Lycius. There
is a great deal of very imaginative transformative writing here, a compelling
series of variations and consistently inventive orchestration. There
is not the same density of incident as in Lancelot und Elaine but this
allows a certain increased spaciousness of lyricism and it’s a surprise
to me that this piece was only performed after MacDowell’s death.
MacDowell in these works is full of technical skill,
has a strong sense of melodic contour and curve, a real control of thematic
relationships, splendid abilities of orchestration and architecture.
If nothing really bursts from the scores to enrapture and haunt the
mind there are many compensations to enjoy along the way.
Jonathan Woolf
|