These fascinating CDs raise the inevitable subject 
          of the conflict between spirit and letter in the interpretation 
          of music. Stokowski was renowned, some would say notorious, for taking 
          liberties with the music he conducted, though on the basis of most of 
          these recordings, he didn’t do as much of this as we might have been 
          led to believe. What is clear is that he remained to the end a conductor 
          with exceptionally strong communicative powers, and that he used these 
          in a wide range of music, often by contemporaneous or recent composers. 
        
 
        
CD1 starts with a powerful reading of Sibelius’ 
          First Symphony, recorded with the National Symphony Orchestra – 
          a British free-lance band of high quality – in West Ham Central Mission 
          in November 1976. This symphony, so much the weakest of the composer’s 
          seven, benefits greatly, to my ear, from the Stokowski treatment. The 
          recording is more than acceptable for its time, and conductor and players 
          give it all they’ve got. Stokowski is strong on detail, too; listen 
          to the clear bass notes from the harp at the beginning of the Andante 
          (CD1 track 2), or the numerous important utterances from 
          the tuba, an instrument which in Sibelius always seems to suggest the 
          appearance of some dark monster from the nether reaches of Norse mythology. 
        
 
        
The first movement is given a very fine and controlled 
          performance. Stokowski emphasises not only the drama and the passion, 
          but also the importance of symphonic growth, which was to become Sibelius’ 
          guiding principle. In the long development section, (track 1, around 
          5:18 to around 8:00), I was struck more than ever before by its resemblance 
          to the second part of the first movement of Symphony no.5; that sense 
          of disparate fragments of music being slowly drawn together and assembled. 
          The technique is used to far greater effect in the later work, but the 
          seeds are here. 
        
 
        
The Andante is potentially more controversial, 
          in that Stokowski adopts a very steady tempo, arguably ignoring the 
          composer’s qualification of the word Andante with ma non troppo 
          lento, i.e. ‘but not too slow’. Many listeners will find, I think, 
          that the opening drags more than a little, though there is a compensating 
          intensification of the sense of sadness and loss which pervades this 
          lovely movement, and, as in the preceding track, Stokowski’s sense of 
          the growth of the music is very sure. The Scherzo is appropriately 
          vigorous, though timpani are perhaps rather too violent! Stokowski clearly 
          relishes the colourful scoring of the Trio, with its serenading horns 
          and harp glissandi spurting upwards like geysers. The finale is more 
          convincing than usual; again, the conductor encourages the players to 
          ‘go for broke’, so that the occasional uncertainties of the music seem 
          less significant, and the ‘big’ tune – and what a great tune it is – 
          seems to arise inevitably out of the musical expression. 
        
 
        
The recording of the Nielsen Second Symphony was 
          made live at a concert in Copenhagen in 1967. There are some rough edges 
          in the playing of the Danish State Symphony Orchestra, but generally 
          the performance is good There is a particularly impassioned version 
          of the third movement, the Andante malincolico, to my mind the 
          finest movement of the four. Overall, the symphony shows that Nielsen 
          was still short of the mastery he was to achieve in the Sinfonia 
          Espansiva. The symphony is based around the novel idea of embodying 
          one of the human ‘temperaments’ in each of the four movements. So we 
          have a ‘colleric’ first movement – angry and tempestuous – a ‘phlegmatic’ 
          second – good-natured and humorous – a ‘melancholy’ third, as mentioned 
          above, and a ‘sanguine’ finale. This last was clearly the one Nielsen 
          found hardest to portray, and it ends in a rather vacuous triumphalism, 
          with a march that brings to mind some of Elgar’s less distinguished 
          pot-boilers! 
        
 
        
The three little Grainger ‘lollipops’, recorded 
          in New York in 1950, constitute a real historic curiosity. In 1949, 
          Stokowski wrote to Grainger, who had been resident in the USA since 
          1915, by the way – to ask if he would make some new arrangements of 
          some of his most popular short works, making use of (in Stokowski’s 
          words) "…such instruments as Vibraharps, Marimbaphones, Saxophones, 
          Celestes…" giving the "impression of music played and danced 
          on the village green". Quite apart from his imperfect grasp of 
          organology, what on earth made Stokowski associate, even in his wildest 
          dreams, saxophones and "vibraharps" etc. with the village 
          green?! I don’t know, but the arrangements are typically delightful 
          and are well captured here, though some of the tuned percussion playing 
          is far from the standard we expect as the norm today. 
        
 
        
CD2 is much more of a pot-pourri. Starting with the 
          well-known fanfare from Dukas’s ‘La Péri’, it continues 
          with a recording of the Brahms Tragic Overture made in 
          1977. This must surely be one of Stokowski’s very last studio sessions, 
          as he was 95 at the time, and died just five months later. No sign of 
          waning powers in the music, though; this is a fresh and vigorous performance, 
          though not one which gets to the core of this great work. The opening 
          brisk tempo suggests a business-like approach, so that much of the mystery 
          is absent, as is the crucial sense of epiphany at 8:20, where the horns 
          rise like a blessing. 
        
 
        
Most of the other items are well played light pieces, 
          though Ibert’s fine Escales (‘Ports of Call’) is 
          well worth having. Odd that this piece doesn’t seem to feature in the 
          catalogue in a modern recording at present (there is a Naxos recording 
          with Takuo Yuasa and one of the Paris orchestras. Ed). Perhaps this 
          issue will help; the three sections evoke in turn Rome, Tunis and Valencia, 
          and the music is fabulously scored and full of delicious and often quite 
          exotic touches of melody and harmony. Perhaps ‘Tunis’ is a bit of a 
          cliché, with its wailing oboe snake-charming away against pizzicato 
          strings, but the vivacity and rhythm of ‘Valencia’ more than compensates 
          for this. These are charming musical post-cards in the manner of Copland’s 
          El Salon Mexico.
        
 
        
But the major item in this second CD is a good old 
          ‘bleeding chunk’ of Wagner, in the shape of the ‘Love Music’ 
          from Tristan und Isolde, stitched together by Stokowski from 
          parts of Acts II and III. The Philadelphia Orchestra plays sumptuously, 
          and it is quite something to hear their ’cello launching into the melody 
          of ‘O sink hernieder’. I’ve always felt that one of the supreme 
          imaginative achievements of the whole opera is Brangäne’s warning 
          aria from her watching-post, with the glorious irony of her words, so 
          full of foreboding, floating on top of the most erotic music the world 
          had heard up to this point in history. 
        
 
        
So there is much to admire; but Stokowski was no true 
          Wagnerian, and never conducted the operas complete. The ‘symphonic poem’ 
          created here lacks sufficient contrast, and is like eating your way 
          through not one but two boxes of luxury chocolates at one sitting 
          (do try). Despite the glories, my ear tired by the end, and I did sense 
          that someone at the record company was showing a mischievous sense of 
          humour by following all this excessive sensual indulgence with Glière’s 
          little Russian Sailors’ Dance. Quick, clear the bodies 
          off the stage – here come the corps de ballet!
        
 
        
Notwithstanding, these are wonderful CDs, and remind 
          us of the breadth of Stokowski’s musical achievements and sympathies. 
          He was a unique figure, incapable of turning in a boring or routine 
          performance, and often able to illuminate the expressive essence of 
          the music he loved in an inimitable way. 
        
 
        
Gwyn Parry-Jones