This was Puccini’s first opera, his hasty response 
          to the competition for a one-act opera announced in 1883 by the publisher 
          Sanzogno. Though he didn’t get anywhere – the lucky composers were Guglielmo 
          Zuelli and Luigi Napelli – Puccini was already acquiring influential 
          friends, among them Arrigo Boito, who got up a subscription which enabled 
          the opera to be produced at the Teatro Dal Verme, Milan, in 1884. It 
          earned Puccini considerable success and a contract with the publisher 
          Ricordi. He expanded it into two acts, in which form it reached the 
          Turin Regio Theatre by the end of 1884 and La Scala the following year. 
          Further revisions were made in 1888 and 1892, but soon after this it 
          was overtaken by the masterpieces we all know and fell into oblivion. 
        
 
        
It is easy to make fun of this story which opens with 
          the engagement of two childhood sweethearts in a Black Forest village; 
          he, Roberto, has just got a big inheritance and has to go off to Magonza 
          for a few days to get it. She, Anna, has premonitions (of course) that 
          he’ll never come back and he (of course) assures her of his undying 
          love. So far so good and that’s the first Act (there’s also Guglielmo, 
          Anna’s father, who pops up from time to time without really adding much 
          to the action). At this point a narrator is brought in to update us 
          on some bits of story that would not have been easy to show on stage; 
          Roberto has done the expected and betrayed Anna (of course) for a mermaid 
          (maybe you didn’t guess that bit) who happened to be hanging around 
          Magonza while he was there and Anna has died (of course) of a broken 
          heart. There follows a lengthy but attractive orchestral interlude which 
          enshrines a chorus of women mourners – not quite a humming chorus but 
          something like one. Now the narrator explains that there is a legend 
          in the Black Forest of the Villi, the spirits of young girls who have 
          died of broken hearts, who await and avenge the traitor, killing him 
          in the press of their dance. 
        
 
        
So Act 2 opens as Roberto, who has been sent packing 
          by his mermaid (of course), comes back home full of repentance (of course) 
          and hoping to find Anna still waiting for him. Anna, now one of the 
          Villi, does appear to him, but, she explains, she is no longer love 
          but vengeance. His vain attempt to escape the Villi is blocked by Anna 
          herself and he is trampled to death in fulfilment of the legend. 
        
 
        
It is, as I say, easy to make fun of this. But the 
          work is an endearing one all the same and it is also easy to see Anna 
          as a proto-Butterfly figure and the feckless young Roberto as a proto-Pinkerton. 
          Puccini already showed a marked predilection for lyrical, melodic writing 
          and he has more orchestral know-how than we might have dared to hope. 
          He is also definitely a modernist – closer to Catalani than to Verdi. 
          If he cannot breathe life into Guglielmo and if Roberto hardly earns 
          our sympathy, Anna, particularly on the strength of her Act 1 aria "Se 
          come voi piccini", can take her place, within limits, among Puccini 
          heroines. 
        
 
        
Lorin Maazel’s Puccini cycle for CBS was comprehensive 
          enough to include Le Villi in 1988. With a cast headed by Scotto and 
          Domingo and with Tito Gobbi emerging from retirement to play the narrator 
          (a considerable coup, this), further recordings might seem superfluous. 
          At the time it was made few even remembered its 1954 predecessor; Cetra 
          LPs were notoriously shrill (I speak in general, I haven’t heard the 
          LPs of this particular recording) and their "Villi", unlike 
          many, didn’t even have a great name in the cast to justify perseverance. 
        
 
        
Nonetheless, it proves as modestly endearing as the 
          work itself. The sound now falls easily on the ear, restricted in the 
          bigger choral/orchestral moments but clear in the gentler ones and with 
          the voices producing well. I have already admired Basile’s "Chénier" 
          and "Tosca" in this series; he is a natural Puccinian in the 
          grand Italian tradition, and he and the orchestra sound as if they have 
          known this rare score all their lives. 
        
 
        
Elisabetta Fusco has a very attractive voice; small, 
          perhaps, but with real quality over most of its range. This quality 
          is sometimes carried up over the stave (there are some lovely piano 
          high As), but on other occasions, usually though not always when putting 
          more pressure on the tone, she seems uneasy. Obviously there were still 
          some problems to be sorted out. Even so, I would gladly hear the performance 
          again for her sincere, convincing portrayal. Dal Ferro is a typically 
          bright, ringing but not unsubtle Italianate tenor. In an evident attempt 
          not to be too bright and ringing, he rounds his vowels too consistently 
          into "o"s, singing "t’omo" instead of "t’amo" 
          and so on, with the risk that his voice seems at times swallowed back 
          in his throat. Still, the timbre is attractive. Puccini didn’t help 
          Guglielmo by making him a high baritone rather than a real bass – there 
          is not enough difference between him and Roberto. It also doesn’t help 
          that Verlinghieri, though a decent enough singer, lacks real weight 
          of utterance. His narration is effective but reminds us that Italian 
          ideas of elocution have changed as much in 50 years as have English 
          ones – think of the ringing tones of some of the old BBC announcers 
          in the immediate post-war period or, if you understand Italian, of Mascagni’s 
          spoken introduction to his recording of "Cavalleria Rusticana"; 
          nobody today would narrate it quite like this ("he sounds like 
          Mussolini" would be the euro-in-the-slot reaction). 
        
 
        
It’s a pity that the booklet, while relating the history 
          of the work (in Italian and in reasonable English; the hilarious title 
          "The First Puccini’s Opera" cannot be the work of the translator 
          of the text itself) and giving the libretto (without translation), does 
          not tell us anything about these singers, though we do get photos of 
          them and the conductor. It is a matter for reflection that we have here 
          an opera by a young hopeful who made it, sung by three young hopefuls 
          who evidently didn’t. Elisabetta Fusco has not passed without trace; 
          she sang Barberina in the famous Schwarzkopf/Giulini "Figaro" 
          and a small part in the Callas/Schwarzkopf "Turandot". A pirate 
          issue from La Fenice, Venice, in 1960, has her singing in Handel’s "Alcina" 
          alongside Joan Sutherland. More recently she has been (is?) a voice 
          professor at Naples Conservatoire. I can find no traces of Gianni Dal 
          Ferro (who looks, from the photo, to have been rather older) but Silvano 
          Verlinghieri cropped up, usually in second casts, over the following 
          decade or so. He sang Escamillo to Simionato’s Carmen in Rome in 1959, 
          for example, and Amonasro under Serafin in Florence in 1963. The healthy 
          operatic life of a country (Italy still had a healthy operatic life 
          in the 1950s) depends on the availability of reliable, honest-to-goodness 
          practitioners such as these. An issue like this documents this everyday 
          operatic life, and it would be nice to have more information about those 
          that made it possible. 
        
 
        
I suppose the Maazel (which I haven’t heard) will be 
          the "natural choice" for Le Villi; but this was my introduction 
          to the music. If it’s yours, too, I think you’ll enjoy it. 
        
 
        
        
Christopher Howell