This is the second release in Michael Tilson Thomas’s 
          new Mahler symphony cycle from San Francisco. It follows his recording 
          of the Sixth Symphony earlier in 2002. I had some reservations about 
          that performance, as you can read in my 
          review of it. However, this First Symphony is far more recommendable. 
          I think it must be said that there is much less that can "go wrong" 
          for the conductor in this work. The intellectual and emotional challenges 
          are less. Provided he has a first rate orchestra at his disposal and 
          doesn’t try to weigh down work with too much of life’s later baggage 
          what is very much a youthful work he should produce a satisfying version 
          at least, and Tilson Thomas does far more than that. I admire especially 
          the way he understands when to be serious and when not and in so doing 
          he covers the multi-faceted nature of the piece and therefore takes 
          in that youthful quality which I think so important. He never tries 
          to paper over the cracks in what is quite an episodic piece either. 
          Almost revelling in the inexperience of the way it’s put together. He 
          keeps tempi up in the faster sections, stressing energy, but in the 
          more contemplative passages brings out the imagination of the young 
          Mahler very well also. Just occasionally he cannot see a gallery without 
          playing to it, as we shall see, but this symphony is robust enough to 
          stand it. 
        
 
        
The introduction to the first movement has just the 
          right mixture of dream and clarity, the latter from some precise woodwind 
          to disturb the old-world texture. This leads into a really jaunty and 
          well-sprung delivery of the first subject "Wayfarer" song: 
          a good example of Tilson Thomas’s propensity to spring the rythms so 
          well. I also liked the string slides at the start of the development 
          section and the very precise stabs from the bass drum a little later 
          well recorded. Touches like this involve the listener. At the climax 
          of the movement Tilson Thomas’s colouring of the music continues to 
          be imaginative and overall there is just the right amount of rhetorical 
          moulding leading to a joyous dash for the end. This latter is a mood 
          continued into the second movement which is breezy and confident, stopping 
          only for a very witty delivery of the Trio with the catch in the waltz 
          rhythm beautifully pointed out. 
        
 
        
In the third movement the double bass solo at the start 
          for the "Bruder Martin" theme is far too well mannered 
          and there is unfortunately nothing unusual in that. Most recordings 
          and performances these days prettify it. You have to go back to conductors 
          like Mitropoulos (Sony 62342) and Adler (Tahra TAH239240) to hear it 
          played how I think Mahler intended. In his keynote lecture to the XIV 
          Colorado Mahlerfest Donald Mitchell referred to how he had tried, and 
          failed, to stop the principal double bass of one of the world’s great 
          Mahler orchestras "beautifying that opening solo and thus stripping 
          it of its intended character and above all of its power to shock." 
          I agree with Donald Mitchell about this passage needing to deliver as 
          much of its original "power to shock" and I long to hear modern 
          performances where this is realised. Knowing what a perceptive and keenly 
          attentive Mahlerian Tilson Thomas is I am still surprised he appears 
          to fail to get the point of the solo like so many - or rather his principal 
          player does. Tilson Thomas judges well the "Klezmer" 
          passages a little later in the movement making the arrival of the other 
          "Wayfarer" quote in the centre, warmly and affectionately 
          phrased, contrast so well with it. So why not the double bass? I am 
          sorry to press this point but it continues to perplex me why conductors 
          cannot deliver what is needed. The return of the "Bruder Martin" 
          march in the closing passage of the movement is distinguished by malevolent 
          squawks from the clarinet and the distinction with which the deep brass 
          play the counter theme. This latter contribution provides, for me, a 
          moment of adolescent world-weariness that made me smile: a lovely touch 
          matched only by the march music that seems to re-cross our path like 
          something not too distant from the neighbourhood of Charles Ives. With 
          this conductor on the rostrum, this is not such a fanciful notion. 
        
 
        
The opening of the fourth movement is distinguished 
          by some powerful brass playing well caught by the wide range of the 
          sound recording. Tilson Thomas does hold back and coax out the big theme 
          of the second subject more than he perhaps should but, as I wrote earlier, 
          this symphony can stand quite a bit of such coaxing. Just as well really 
          because this is the movement where he allows himself more of the kind 
          of rubato and ritardars he would have learned by example from his mentor 
          Leonard Bernstein - most notably in the coda where he rather "grandstands" 
          unashamedly. Don’t misunderstand me. It is thrilling to hear it played 
          like this once in a while. But it does make me wish the decision had 
          been taken by the producers to leave in the applause that must have 
          greeted the close of any of the "live" performances from which 
          this recording has been made. I think the end of the work as played 
          like this would have sounded more appropriate with the sound of hands 
          clapping after it. If you are going to make recordings "live" 
          then why not include the audience as part of the performance? 
        
 
        
The playing of the San Francisco Symphony Orchestra 
          is sharp, alert, colourful and committed. The brass is especially distinguished 
          with attack and depth. The sound recording does have a wide dynamic 
          range so a few volume adjustments will be necessary, but nothing too 
          troublesome, I think. Among modern recordings this one certainly deserves 
          consideration, but this is a very crowded field. Set against 
          Horenstein (Unicorn UKCD2012), Walter (Sony SM2K 64447) and Kubelik 
          (DG 449 735-2GOR) among older versions and Bernstein (DG 431 036-2), 
          Haitink (Philips 420 936-2) and Boulez (DG 289 459 610-2) among more 
          recent versions, it is hard to justify recommending it as a "must 
          have". Fine though it is with some really imaginative touches, 
          though. 
        
 
        
If you fancy a brand new Mahler First for your collection, 
          this is certainly one to consider. For those planning to collect the 
          whole Tilson Thomas cycle there need be no worries at all. 
        
 
         
        
Tony Duggan 
        
See Tony Duggan's Comparative 
          review of Mahler 1 recordings 
         
        
        
 
         
        
AVAILABILITY 
         
        
Online purchase www.shopsfsymphony.org 
        
Distribution in North America by Delos Records. 
        
Distribution outside North America by Avie Records 
          avie@musicco.f9.co.uk