Brahms was on the point of retiring from composition when the 
        playing of the clarinettist Richard Mühlfeld inspired him to write 
        these two sonatas, as well as a quintet and a trio including the clarinet, 
        and also to go back generally on his decision to retire. 
         
        
Mindful of this, many players aim to evoke lovingly 
          the warmly romantic world to which Brahms clung. If this produced distressingly 
          heavy-handed results in the case of Ralph Manno and Alfredo Perl (Arte 
          Nova 74321 27767 2), the great American clarinettist Harold Wright, 
          partnered by Peter Serkin, left performances which combine surging romanticism 
          and nostalgic songfulness (Boston Records BR 1005CD). This was recommended 
          as a Record of the Month about a year ago and remains a touchstone of 
          traditional Brahms playing, in spite of a recording which does not treat 
          the piano so very kindly (a fact which the present very finely engineered 
          issue rather points up). 
        
 
        
The booklet gives us helpful notes on the music but 
          not a word on the performers. Korsimaa was a "Young Artist of the 
          Year" in 1988 in her native Finland and can also be heard in a 
          work by Crusell on the BIS label. She and Viitasalo approach the music 
          uncluttered, as it were, by preconceptions. Their tempi are slower than 
          Wright’s in all movements, but in the first sonata at least they produce 
          an entirely valid alternative. By making the most of the dynamic contrasts 
          and showing plenty of rhythmic strength they give us a Brahms who, far 
          from reliving nostalgically his past style, is powerfully confronting 
          the problems of the present. It is a less "lovely" Brahms 
          than Wright’s (though the actual playing is beautiful) but its sinewy 
          purposefulness may be preferred by those who complain that this composer 
          always wrote like an old man. 
        
 
        
I am a little less happy with the second sonata which 
          seems, by its nature, a little less suited to a similar operation. This 
          is autumnal music, there is no getting away from it. I also feel 
          there are two miscalculations over tempi. The central section of the 
          second movement is marked "sostenuto", but this surely does 
          not mean that the original "Allegro appassionato" is to be 
          lost sight of wholly, the tempi is broadened in relation to it, 
          but it is not a new tempo altogether. This was one of Manno’s and Perl’s 
          mistakes and Korsimaa and Viitasalo are certainly much less heavy-handed 
          than the Arte Nova team. Indeed, they almost convinced me, but 
          the section does seem a bit too long at this tempo. The other point 
          was right at the end. This sonata closes with a variation movement, 
          mostly in a slow tempo, but for the last three pages Brahms swings into 
          an Allegro. The second of these pages is then marked "Più 
          tranquillo" and here the performance drops right back to a much 
          slower tempo. On the last page Brahms marks no further tempo change, 
          but the music plainly concludes Allegro (and so it is played). This 
          proves, for me, that Brahms’s "Più tranquillo" means 
          a change in atmosphere rather than tempo – he didn’t need to write "A 
          tempo" on the last page because the original tempo has not been 
          departed from. These performers do not agree, and evidently suppose 
          that the "A tempo" was not written by Brahms, either because 
          he thought it was obvious or because he just forgot. However, listen 
          to the effect; does not this Allegro seem absurdly brief, bursting in 
          after so much slow music and then stopping again almost at once? In 
          comparison, Wright and Serkin seem to have it just right. 
        
 
        
I’m sorry to have these reservations over the second 
          sonata because the performance still has many fine qualities and that 
          of the first is really worth having alongside the Wright and Serkin 
          one. Another reason for getting this disc is Soile Isokoski’s performance 
          of the Schubert. Isokoski won the first Elly Ameling competition in 
          1988 and has gradually built up a fine reputation in opera houses on 
          both sides of the Atlantic. Earlier this year she got rave reviews for 
          a disc of Richard Strauss orchestral lieder, including the "Four 
          Last Songs". Her lovely tones negotiate this by no means simple 
          piece with complete ease. The performance has some other points in its 
          favour, too. During the long first section the tempo is held absolutely 
          steady; very often when the piano’s triplets give way to simple quavers 
          a faster tempo is adopted, presumably because the singer’s phrases become 
          very long indeed if the tempo is left unchanged. This evidently creates 
          no problems for Isokoski and the increasing melancholy of the music 
          is hauntingly realised. The final Allegretto is also very well judged. 
        
 
        
        
Christopher Howell