Now that Sir Colin Davis’s later RCA digital set of 
          the Sibelius symphonies with the London Symphony Orchestra is being 
          re-released at mid-price, his earlier Philips analogue set with the 
          Boston Symphony Orchestra is being offered at throw-away prices. And 
          make no mistake: you get well-planned couplings, well-filled discs and 
          performances which (with a few trifling exceptions) are as revealing 
          as any. 
        
 
        
I suppose it’s tempting to talk of a Sibelius ‘tradition’ 
          at Boston, chiefly on account of Koussevitsky’s time there before the 
          war. But that was a long time ago – it’s most unlikely, I suppose, that 
          any of Koussevitsky’s players played in these Davis recordings! – and 
          none of Munch, Leinsdorf or Ozawa seems to have had a particular empathy 
          with Sibelius. Even so, you have to admit that the orchestra sounds 
          as if this music is in their blood: it’s impressively sure-footed playing, 
          and strikingly idiomatic in both colour and character. 
        
 
        
The differences between these 1970s recordings and 
          those Davis made in the late 1990s are subtle, and generally concern 
          matters of detail. If anything, the later versions are tauter, more 
          spontaneous: in most cases, they are distinguished by a stronger sense 
          of overview, but without ever sacrificing attention to detail. However, 
          the earlier readings are in the main exceptionally fine, and remain 
          competitive. 
        
 
        
By common consent, the Fifth was not typical of the 
          best of the Boston cycle: for all its many excellent qualities, it’s 
          a rather studied reading compared with the more atmospheric LSO version. 
          Although the recording sounds well in a number of ways, the lack of 
          space (of ‘air’ in the studio) may be said to rob the music of its ability 
          to ‘speak’, or to evoke the extra-musical imagery I know many listeners 
          enjoy in this music. 
        
 
        
The Sixth was recorded at a later session and is, by 
          any standards, superb: the string playing in the all-important opening 
          pages is sumptuous, and the sense of organic growth throughout is compelling. 
          The LSO/RCA version may be more expansive, but it is no more persuasive. 
        
 
        
As you would expect from a charismatic conductor like 
          Davis, Tapiola is both powerful and evocative. However, the rather 
          close balance of the strings, with winds placed well behind, means that 
          some orchestral detail is less clear than it might be. By comparison, 
          Ashkenazy’s Kingsway Hall recording for Decca (his is an obvious rival 
          at this price, and it’s digital) is more open, spacious and resonant: 
          inevitably, the music has more impact, and even more atmosphere. 
        
 
        
These are recommendable versions, then, but there are 
          better available. An irritating point on which to end: there are no 
          notes whatsoever, just ‘trailers’ for other Philips Classics and Eloquence 
          releases – this really is inexcusable! 
          Peter J Lawson