Veteran collectors will have long cherished their copies of 
        EMI's three LP set of recordings taken from performances at Covent Garden 
        between 1926 and 1936 (RLS 742). That set contained substantial excerpts 
        from the 4 July 1928 performance of Boris Godounov, famous for preserving 
        almost the entirety of the title role as performed in that edition by 
        the great Russian bass, Feodor Chaliapin. 
         
        
Guild and the Immortal Performances Recorded Music 
          Society have now gone to great lengths to gather on one disc all the 
          surviving sides made of that performance, now extended to a full hour-and-a-quarter, 
          though with some interpolations from elsewhere to fill in gaps in the 
          originals (more on these below). 
        
 
        
The performance is sung in Italian (and a little Latin, 
          in the Revolutionary Scene of Act IV) by a largely Italian cast. Chaliapin 
          of course sings the original Russian text. 
        
 
        
When EMI issued their excerpts they had to try to reconstruct 
          the text of the Italian portions of the performance by ear since they 
          seemed not to correspond exactly to any existing published Italian version. 
          The Guild set bypasses this problem by not including a libretto but 
          it must be said that the booklet is otherwise (except for some misspelling 
          of artists' names) very well done, including an extended synopsis cued 
          to the excerpts included, a discography of the sides recorded at the 
          performance, notes on the restorations made for this reissue, an article 
          on Chaliapin, and many photos. 
        
 
        
The transfers are very well done. There is, inevitably, 
          some noise, especially prominent in the earliest scenes (or perhaps 
          the ear simply gradually adjusts). But, allowing for the limitations 
          and vagaries of instantaneous recording in the largely experimental 
          days of the late 1920s, the voices are wonderfully well reproduced in 
          this edition, better than the EMI and far superior to the version issued 
          in his "private" LP series by the late Edward J Smith (UORC 161). 
        
 
        
There some inconsistencies of pitch. How much this 
          is due to the problems encountered in the originals (a number of scenes, 
          though recorded, were judged at the time too faulty to be issued) and 
          how much to the current restoration cannot be determined. In any case 
          the non-Chaliapin portions, particular from the Polish and Revolutionary 
          scenes, vary between a quarter-tone and a semitone flat. In addition 
          Pimen's narrative in the scene of Boris's death (taken apparently, though 
          nowhere specified as such, from a performance at the New York Metropolitan) 
          is slightly sharp. 
        
 
        
Still this is probably as complete a rendering of this 
          important performance as we shall ever have, undistorted by sonic improvements 
          and presenting honest and full-toned reproductions of the originals. 
          That it preserves Chaliapin's greatest role as well as it does is a 
          tribute to the producers. At the price it should be in every serious 
          collection. 
        
 
        
        
Calvin M Goodwin 
         
        
 
        
See also reviews by Christopher 
          Fiefield and Robert Farr 
        
Letter received from the
          IMMORTAL PERFORMANCES RECORDED MUSIC SOCIETY
        
We have been inordinate admirers of Calvin Goodman's two-volume book 
          on Edward J. Smith, the first of the "pirates" so called, 
          and we appreciated Goodwin's review of our release on Guild CDs of what 
          exists of Chaliapin's Boris. We do not agree, however, with his assessment 
          of a pitch variation which amounts to a semi-tone (thereabouts), a fact 
          he has continued to assert in our recent letter exchange.
        Mr. Goodwin initially informed me that he based his calcula-tion on 
          his Technics machine, the digital read-out of which indicated to him 
          a semitone variance. Mr. Goodwin also offered as his reference (for 
          turntables), Michael Hemstock's book on Fernando De Lucia (The King 
          of Speed Problems), quoting Hem-stock that the difference between 78 
          rpm and 64 rpm is two full tones. Hence 7 rpm constitutes one tone and, 
          necessarily, 3.5 rpm equates to a full semi-tone. And yet Mr. Goodwin 
          later maintained that his offset of 5/10ths of a single rpm on his turntable 
          equated to a full semi-tone of pitch variance. When asked to address 
          this apparent contradiction, he left us with his belief that his Technics 
          machine indicated what it did, and that's what he continues to rely 
          on. But one doesn't have to have his Technics machine with pitch control 
          to determine the actual pitch deviation.
        We decided to undertake an experiment, which music lovers with a pitch-variable 
          (readout) LP turntable can also conduct. If they play the Guild CD on 
          their CD machine and compare it to a commercial recording of Boris on 
          LP (such as the Christoff HMV Dobrowen recording), they'll find that 
          the pitch for the Kromy Forest Scene won't match until they reach 32.8 
          on the turnta-ble readout. That isn't a semi-tone off, it's a quarter-tone 
          (or, according to Mr. Goodwin's own figures, drawn from Hem-stock's 
          book, it's an eighth of a tone), inaudible to most mu-sicians (and most 
          music critics) and within acceptable broad-cast restoration tolerances. 
          Our turntable speeds have just recently been recalibrated and the variable 
          speed settings are dead on, as shown on a stroboscope.
        After numerous exchanges, it became evident that because we do not 
          have a CD machine with pitch control, the two of us needed to find a 
          common method of measuring the variance. In conclu-sion, Mr. Goodwin, 
          who did not have a commercial Boris on LP, selected a work he knew well, 
          and on the turntable changed the pitch control to what he termed a semi-tone. 
          This he stated was achieved by changing his turntable pitch control 
          from 33.3 to 32.7 (a changed 6/10th of a rpm). He considered this speed 
          to represent a semi-tone in pitch discrepancy.
        Contrary to Mr. Goodwin's assertions in his letter to us, claiming 
          that 32.8 represents a deviance of a semi-tone, Mr. Goodwin, in his 
          book on EJS (Volume I) on page 24, referring to EJS disc No. 114, states:
        "The set plays a quarter-tone low at 33.3: a playing speed of 
          33.8 - 34 has been suggested to compensate." 
        
        In this finding, he asserts that a lapse of 5/10th (or 33.8 rpm) of 
          a tone constitutes a quarter tone but in his defense of his findings, 
          as to the speed deviation in the Kromy Forest (or Revolutionary Scene), 
          he states that this same 5/10th de-viation down to 32.8 equals a semi-tone.
        We consider a semi-tone lapse to be grievous, therefore the 32.8 demonstration 
          that we conveyed to Mr. Goodwin and our quotation of his own language 
          in his book on EJS, should have raised questions in his assessment, 
          which it did not. This is most regrettable. I have long admired Mr. 
          Goodwin's work on the EJS series but we have every reason, in this instance, 
          to question and protest Mr. Goodwin's statements as to the degree of 
          pitch variation.
        Five tenths (5/10ths) of a single revolution does not support Mr. Goodwin's 
          finding of a semi-tone variance as to the Kromy Scene. Pimen's narrative 
          is also 5/10ths of a single rpm off, which is a quarter-tone. All this 
          within acceptable variance, for these ancient discs, often the result 
          of speed-drift in the analogue machine, though I, myself, wish there 
          to be no variation at all.
        We are not disputing a critic's negative assessment, which are issues 
          of taste upon which reasonable people can often dis-agree, we are disputing 
          his facts. His assessment is unfair to the Guild release on a basis 
          that a simple demonstration proves.
         Sincerely,
        Richard Caniell
          Archivist
          RC/mm