Claudio Abaddo has taken his time with his Bruckner 
          recordings and there is still no sign as to whether he has embarked 
          on a complete symphony cycle or not. So far DG has released the First, 
          the Fourth and the Fifth, but a look at the date of this Ninth shows 
          that it remained in the DG archives for over four years before release. 
          I wonder why. It can’t be because of inferior quality. Opinions and 
          preferences aside, interpretation and playing are both excellent and 
          whilst some may find the sound rather closely blended it is still a 
          rich and refined recording with lots of detail. 
        
 
        
First praise must got to the Vienna Philharmonic. Always 
          special in this composer’s music, particularly with a conductor they 
          like and admire, the brass is powerful and unflagging right the way 
          through this "live" recording, but they also maintain that 
          rich, sonorous sound that never tires the ear and can vary tone in the 
          blinking of an eye. The strings also have the saturation sound these 
          players specialise in and with Abbado’s stress on the lyrical aspects 
          of this score maybe at the expense of its architectural that counts 
          for a lot. Perhaps the woodwinds suffer just a little in the recording 
          balance but they more than match their colleagues. 
        
 
        
As I indicated, Abaddo is, as ever, the lyrical Brucknerian. 
          This leads him to always make sure that the great outbursts of often 
          anguished brass in the first movement never sound coarse. This avoidance 
          of the coarse can diminish somewhat those architectural properties that 
          are so much a keynote of Bruckner’s method. By that I mean that at those 
          times when Bruckner’s geography calls for a sudden mountain range to 
          be marked very vividly on the musical map Abaddo’s instinct is to smooth 
          over the transition slightly and this is helped by the closer recording. 
          More air around the instruments would allow the silences to be filled 
          in by the cathedral reverberation that is always in Bruckner’s aural 
          imagination too. As I say all this accentuates for me the impression 
          that lyricism rather than architecture is on Abbado’s mind. But no matter, 
          it’s a valid view that Abaddo projects with confidence and conviction 
          and I’m prepared to go along with it even if I don’t find it entirely 
          convincing myself. In the third movement Abbado therefore shapes the 
          great themes with a particular warmth and sincerity, more human, less 
          spiritual, and here he is at his best, his interpretation most appropriate. 
          Which is not quite what I felt in the first movement’s corresponding 
          sections which need more black mystery, more ghosts in the machine. 
          For that you want Furtwängler’s 1944 concert recording (Music and 
          Arts CD730) made in Berlin as that city prepared to burn. However, I 
          wouldn’t want you left with the impression that this is a Bruckner Ninth 
          without power and heft. There is plenty of that, especially in a powerful 
          and evil pounding scherzo where the VPO brass shake off their golden 
          chain mail to replace it with a suit of armour that the Black Prince 
          himself would have worn with pride. 
        
 
        
For many years my own reference version of the Ninth 
          has mostly been with Karajan and the Berlin Philharmonic on DG Galleria 
          recorded in 1966 (429 904-2). Karajan’s remake from eight years later 
          is very nearly its equal but I still prefer the more spacious recording 
          and sense of the numinous of the earlier version, so make sure to order 
          the number I have given for the 1966 version. Karajan also dares to 
          make those huge dynamic contrasts that Bruckner’s score abounds with 
          really tell and which Abaddo doesn’t seem to want to press too far. 
          Karajan is also backed by an orchestra whose range of expression in 
          every part of this score is huge containing powerful, thrilling brass 
          and string playing that rises to heights of eloquence never equalled 
          in this work. However, compared with the Vienna Philharmonic for Abbado 
          you do have the impression that the Berliners of 1966 have been given 
          their heads to an extent that the slightly more reined-back Viennese 
          are not and there is enough air in the acoustic for them to really stand 
          out. Listen to the black trombones, the ringing trumpets, the achingly 
          beautiful cellos and, above all, Karajan’s sense of the dramatic matched 
          with his flair for heavenly calm. Apart from Karajan I have also always 
          admired Bruno Walter’s nobler and softer-grained reading on Sony (SMK64483) 
          which is perhaps a better example of the kind of performance 
          Abaddo seems to be aiming for. 
        
 
        
This is an interesting and rewarding Bruckner Ninth. 
          Not one to replace other top recommendations, but certainly one to take 
          down for a distinctive view. 
        
 
        
        
Tony Duggan